Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Periprosthetic fractures: an unrecognized osteoporosis crisis

  • Concise Clinical Review
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Total joint replacement is common and increasing. Many of these patients have low bone mineral density preoperatively, and arthroplasty leads to bone loss. As falls are common before and after arthroplasty, it is unsurprising that periprosthetic fractures, defined as those associated with an orthopedic device, whether a joint replacement or other internal fixation devices, are not rare. These fractures engender morbidity and mortality comparable to osteoporosis-related hip fractures but remain largely unrecognized and untreated by osteoporosis/metabolic bone disease clinicians. Indeed, recent osteoporosis guidelines are silent regarding periprosthetic fractures. The purposes of this clinical review are to briefly describe the epidemiology of arthroplasty procedures and periprosthetic fractures, raise awareness that these fractures are osteoporosis-related, and suggest approaches likely to reduce their occurrence. Notably, bone health evaluation is essential following the occurrence of a periprosthetic fracture to reduce subsequent fracture risk. Importantly, in addition to such secondary fracture prevention, primary prevention, i.e., bone health assessment and optimization prior to elective orthopedic procedures, is appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N et al (2020) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis-2020 Update. Endocr Pract 26:1–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. LeBoff MS, Greenspan SL, Insogna KL, Lewiecki EM, Saag KG, Singer AJ, Siris ES (2022) The clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 33(10):2049–2102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05900-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. McCloskey E, Rathi J, Heijmans S et al (2021) The osteoporosis treatment gap in patients at risk of fracture in European primary care: a multi-country cross-sectional observational study. Osteoporos Int 32:251–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khosla S, Shane E (2016) A crisis in the treatment of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 31:1485–1487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson PA, Jeray KJ, Lane JM, Binkley NC (2019) Bone health optimization: beyond own the bone: AOA critical issues. J Bone Joint Surg 101:1413–1419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. MaraditKremers H, Larson DR, Crowson CS, Kremers WK, Washington RE, Steiner CA, Jiranek WA, Berry DJ (2015) Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:1386–1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh JA, Yu S, Chen L, Cleveland JD (2019) Rates of total joint replacement in the United States: future projections to 2020–2040 using the national inpatient sample. J Rheumatol 46:1134–1140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fang M, Noiseux N, Linson E, Cram P (2015) The effect of advancing age on total joint replacement outcomes. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 6:173–179

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ha CW, Park YB (2020) Underestimation and undertreatment of osteoporosis in patients awaiting primary total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140:1109–1114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Delsmann MM, Strahl A, Mühlenfeld M, Jandl NM, Beil FT, Ries C, Rolvien T (2021) High prevalence and undertreatment of osteoporosis in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Osteoporos Int 32:1661–1668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Prince JM, Bernatz JT, Binkley N, Abdel MP, Anderson PA (2019) Changes in femoral bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Osteoporos 14:23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lo CWT, Tsang WWN, Yan CH, Lord SR, Hill KD, Wong AYL (2019) Risk factors for falls in patients with total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthr Cartil 27:979–993

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Capone A, Congia S, Civinini R, Marongiu G (2017) Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and current treatment. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 14:189–196

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Purudappa PP, Ramanan SP, Tripathy SK, Varatharaj S, Mounasamy V, Sambandam SN (2020) Intra-operative fractures in primary total knee arthroplasty - a systematic review. Knee Surg Relat Res 32:40

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Young PS, Patil S, Meek RMD (2018) Intraoperative femoral fractures: prevention is better than cure. Bone Jt Res 7:103–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Della Rocca GJ, Leung KS, Pape HC (2011) Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and future projections. J Orthop Trauma 25(Suppl 2):S66-70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abdel MP, Watts CD, Houdek MT, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ (2016) Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32 644 primary total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience. Bone Joint J 98-B:461–467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Platzer P, Schuster R, Aldrian S, Prosquill S, Krumboeck A, Zehetgruber I, Kovar F, Schwameis K, Vecsei V (2010) Management and outcome of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Trauma 68:1464–1470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Campbell JT, Moore RS, Iannotti JP, Norris TR, Williams GR (1998) Periprosthetic humeral fractures: mechanisms of fracture and treatment options. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7:406–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gromov K, Bersang A, Nielsen CS, Kallemose T, Husted H, Troelsen A (2017) Risk factors for post-operative periprosthetic fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally coated double-tapered cementless femoral component. Bone Jt J 99-B:451–457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nash W, Harris A (2014) The Dorr type and cortical thickness index of the proximal femur for predicting peri-operative complications during hemiarthroplasty. J Orthop Surg 22:92–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Whiting P HK, Bernantz J, Parvanta Johnson K, Krueger D, Borchardt G, Binkley N, Anderson PA (2022) Periprosthetic fractures: the unappreciated osteoporosis crisis. American Society for Bone and Mineral Research Annual MeetinbgAustin, Texas, pp asbmr.org/ItineraryBuilder/PresentationDetail.aspx?pid=ca9c21b20-d28b24–24bf21–88b27–69f70f4773bf&ptag=WebItinerarySearch.

  23. Albright JA, Testa EJ, Meghani O, Chang K, Daniels AH, Barrett TJ (2022) Increased risk of hospital readmissions and implant-related complications in patients who had a recent history of fragility fracture: a matched cohort analysis. J Arthroplasty 38(2):266–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marsland D, Mears SC (2012) A review of periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 3:107–120

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G (2005) Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty 20:857–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cavalli L, Brandi ML (2013) Periprosthetic bone loss: diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. F1000Res 2:266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Prieto-Alhambra D, Javaid MK, Judge A, Murray D, Carr A, Cooper C, Arden NK (2011) Association between bisphosphonate use and implant survival after primary total arthroplasty of the knee or hip: population based retrospective cohort study. BMJ 343:d7222

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Prieto-Alhambra D, Javaid MK, Judge A, Maskell J, Cooper C, Arden NK (2015) Hormone replacement therapy and mid-term implant survival following knee or hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a population-based cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis 74:557–563

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McDonald CL, Lemme NJ, Testa EJ, Aaron R, Hartnett DA, Cohen EM (2022) Bisphosphonates in total joint arthroplasty: a review of their use and complications. Arthroplast Today 14:133–139

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lo JC, Grimsrud CD, Ott SM, Chandra M, Hui RL, Ettinger B (2019) Atypical femur fracture incidence in women increases with duration of bisphosphonate exposure. Osteoporos Int 30:2515–2520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Dell RM, Adams AL, Greene DF, Funahashi TT, Silverman SL, Eisemon EO, Zhou H, Burchette RJ, Ott SM (2012) Incidence of atypical nontraumatic diaphyseal fractures of the femur. J Bone Miner Res 27:2544–2550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Abdel MP, Houdek MT, Watts CD, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ (2016) Epidemiology of periprosthetic femoral fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience. Bone Jt J 98-B:468–474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Li L, Zhao X, Yang X, Yang L, Xing F, Tang X (2021) Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for the management of femoral neck fractures in the elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141:1043–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bottle A, Griffiths R, White S, Wynn-Jones H, Aylin P, Moppett I, Chowdhury E, Wilson H, Davies BM (2020) Periprosthetic fractures: the next fragility fracture epidemic? National Observational Study BMJ Open 10:e042371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Casp AJ, Montgomery SR Jr, Cancienne JM, Brockmeier SF, Werner BC (2020) Osteoporosis and implant-related complications after anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 28:121–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Brusalis CM, Taylor SA (2020) Periprosthetic fractures in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current concepts and advances in management. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 13:509–519

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Li QD, Yang JS, He BR, Liu TJ, Gao L, Chai X, Tian X, Hao DJ (2022) Risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior long-segment internal fixation for chronic symptomatic osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures with kyphosis. BMC Surg 22:189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Nguyen NL, Kong CY, Hart RA (2016) Proximal junctional kyphosis and failure-diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 9:299–308

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Boylan MR, Riesgo AM, Paulino CB, Slover JD, Zuckerman JD, Egol KA (2018) Mortality following periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures versus native hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 100:578–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hoellwarth JS, Fourman MS, Crossett L, Goodman M, Siska P, Moloney GB, Tarkin IS (2018) Equivalent mortality and complication rates following periprosthetic distal femur fractures managed with either lateral locked plating or a distal femoral replacement. Inj 49:392–397

    Google Scholar 

  41. Patsiogiannis N, Kanakaris NK, Giannoudis PV (2021) Periprosthetic hip fractures: an update into their management and clinical outcomes. EFORT Open Rev 6:75–92

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Griffiths EJ, Cash DJ, Kalra S, Hopgood PJ (2013) Time to surgery and 30-day morbidity and mortality of periprosthetic hip fractures. Inj 44:1949–1952

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Young SW, Walker CG, Pitto RP (2008) Functional outcome of femoral peri prosthetic fracture and revision hip arthroplasty: a matched-pair study from the New Zealand Registry. Acta Orthop 79:483–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kurtz SM, Lau EC, Ong KL, Adler EM, Kolisek FR, Manley MT (2017) Which clinical and patient factors influence the national economic burden of hospital readmissions after total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:2926–2937

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Schopper C, Luger M, Hipmair G, Schauer B, Gotterbarm T, Klasan A (2022) The race for the classification of proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures : Vancouver vs Unified Classification System (UCS) - a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23:280

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Egol KA, Carlock KD, Kelly EA et al (2019) Previous implant fractures: a new descriptive classification system. J Orthop Trauma 33:423–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Su J, Wei Y, Li XM, Diao YP, Liu HG, Zhang L (2018) Efficacy of risedronate in improving bone mineral density in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med 97:e13346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Gao J, Gao C, Li H, Wang GS, Xu C, Ran J (2017) Effect of zoledronic acid on reducing femoral bone mineral density loss following total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trails. Int J Surg 47:116–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Shi M, Chen L, Xin Z, Wang Y, Wang W, Yan S (2018) Bisphosphonates for the preservation of periprosthetic bone mineral density after total joint arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of 25 randomized controlled trials. Osteoporos Int 29:1525–1537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Xu J, Li H, Qu Y, Zheng C, Wang B, Shen P, Xie Z, Wei K, Wang Y, Zhao J (2021) Denosumab might prevent periprosthetic bone loss after total hip and knee arthroplasties: a review. Arthroplasty 3:13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Ledin H, Good L, Aspenberg P (2017) Denosumab reduces early migration in total knee replacement. Acta Orthop 88:255–258

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Teng S, Yi C, Krettek C, Jagodzinski M (2015) Bisphosphonate use and risk of implant revision after total hip/knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS ONE 10:e0139927

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Prieto-Alhambra D, Lalmohamed A, Abrahamsen B, Arden NK, de Boer A, Vestergaard P, de Vries F (2014) Oral bisphosphonate use and total knee/hip implant survival: validation of results in an external population-based cohort. Arthritis Rheumatol 66:3233–3240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Khatod M, Inacio MC, Dell RM, Bini SA, Paxton EW, Namba RS (2015) Association of bisphosphonate use and risk of revision after THA: outcomes from a US Total Joint Replacement Registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:3412–3420

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Ro DH, Jin H, Park JY, Lee MC, Won S, Han HS (2019) The use of bisphosphonates after joint arthroplasty is associated with lower implant revision rate. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:2082–2089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Namba RS, Inacio MC, Cheetham TC, Dell RM, Paxton EW, Khatod MX (2016) Lower total knee arthroplasty revision risk associated with bisphosphonate use, even in patients with normal bone density. J Arthroplasty 31:537–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Cheng SH, Kuo YJ, Chen C, Kang YN (2020) Effects of teriparatide and bisphosphonate on spinal fusion procedure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 15:e0237566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Liu WB, Zhao WT, Shen P, Zhang FJ (2018) The effects of bisphosphonates on osteoporotic patients after lumbar fusion: a meta-analysis. Drug Des Devel Ther 12:2233–2240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Guppy KH, Chan PH, Prentice HA, Norheim EP, Harris JE, Brara HS (2020) Does the use of preoperative bisphosphonates in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis affect lumbar fusion rates? Analysis from a national spine registry. Neurosurg Focus 49:E12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Mei J, Song X, Guan X, Wu D, Wang J, Liu Q (2021) Postoperative bisphosphonate do not significantly alter the fusion rate after lumbar spinal fusion: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 16:284

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Chang E, Binkley N, Krueger D, Illgen R, Nickel B, Hennessy D, Bernatz J, Winzenried A, Anderson PA (2022) Proposed bone health screening protocol to identify total knee arthroplasty patients for preoperative DXA. Osteoporos Int 34(1):171–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Shuhart CR, Yeap SS, Anderson PA, Jankowski LG, Lewiecki EM, Morse LR, Rosen HN, Weber DR, Zemel BS, Shepherd JA (2019) Executive summary of the 2019 ISCD position development conference on monitoring treatment, DXA cross-calibration and least significant change, spinal cord injury, peri-prosthetic and orthopedic bone health, transgender medicine, and pediatrics. J Clin Densitom 22:453–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Tanzer M, Graves SE, Peng A, Shimmin AJ (2018) Is cemented or cementless femoral stem fixation more durable in patients older than 75 years of age? A comparison of the best-performing stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 476:1428–1437

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Siddiqi A, Levine BR, Springer BD (2022) Highlights of the 2021 American Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report. Arthroplast Today 13:205–207

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Ben-Shlomo Y, Blom A, Boulton C, et al. (2021) National joint registry annual reports. The National Joint Registry 18th Annual Report 2021. National Joint Registry © National Joint Registry 2021., London

  66. Karrholm J, Rogmark C, Naucler E, Natman J, Vinblad J, Mohaddes M, Rolfson O (2019) Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual report 2019. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. https://registercentrum.blob.core.windows.net/shpr/r/VGR_Annual-report_SHAR_2019_EN_Digital-pages_FINAL-ryxaMBUWZ_.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2023

  67. (AOANJRR AOANJRR (2020) Hip, knee & shoulder arthroplasty: 2020 Annual Report, Adelaide. AOA. https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2020. Accessed 25 Jan 2023

  68. De Cicco A, Toro G, Oliva F, Tarantino U, Schiavone Panni A, Maffulli N (2021) Atypical periprosthetic femoral fractures of the hip: A PRISMA compliant systematic review. Inj 52:2407–2414

    Google Scholar 

  69. Lee YK, Park CH, Kim KC, Hong SH, Ha YC, Koo KH (2018) Frequency and associated factor of atypical periprosthetic femoral fracture after hip arthroplasty. Inj 49:2264–2268

    Google Scholar 

  70. Dózsai D, Ecseri T, Csonka I, Gárgyán I, Doró P, Csonka Á (2020) Atypical periprosthetic femoral fracture associated with long-term bisphosphonate therapy. J Orthop Surg Res 15:414

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Edwards PK, Mears SC, Stambough JB, Foster SE, Barnes CL (2018) Choices, compromises, and controversies in total knee and total hip arthroplasty modifiable risk factors: what you need to know. J Arthroplasty 33:3101–3106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Anderson PA, Morgan SL, Krueger D et al (2019) Use of bone health evaluation in orthopedic surgery: 2019 ISCD Official Position. J Clin Densitom 22:517–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Binkley.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The CME questions related to this article can be found at: www.cme.bonesource.org.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Binkley, N., Nickel, B. & Anderson, P.A. Periprosthetic fractures: an unrecognized osteoporosis crisis. Osteoporos Int 34, 1055–1064 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-023-06695-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-023-06695-w

Keywords

Navigation