Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and bone health: data from a population-based sample of men

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

We aimed to investigate the association between serum lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) and bone health in men. LBP was associated with lower bone density at the mid-forearm and the quantitative heel ultrasound measure, broadband ultrasound attenuation, for heavier participants. Data do not support clear associations between serum LBP and bone health.

Introduction

The objective of this study was to investigate the association between serum lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) and potential downstream effects on skeletal density, quality, and turnover in a population-based sample of men.

Methods

This cross-sectional study utilised data from 1149 men (aged 20–96 year) enrolled in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Blood samples were obtained and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), bone resorption marker, C-telopeptide (CTx), and formation marker, type 1 procollagen amino-terminal-propeptide (P1NP), were measured. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Stiffness Index (SI), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), and speed of sound (SOS) were derived from quantitative heel ultrasound (QUS). Linear regression models were developed to test associations between log-transformed LBP (ln-LBP), BMD, QUS, and bone turnover, after adjusting for potential covariates.

Results

Serum LBP ranged from 1.07–208.53 ng/mL (median 16.53 ng/mL). Those with higher levels were older, less mobile, and had lower BMD at the mid-forearm, otherwise, groups were similar. Before and after adjustment for age, ln-LBP was associated with lower BMD at the spine, total body, and mid-forearm. Further adjustment for weight attenuated associations at the spine and total body, yet the relationship at the mid-forearm was sustained (β − 0.014 ± 0.004, p = 0.001). SOS and SI were not associated with ln-LBP either before or after adjustment for age; however, weight was identified as an effect modifier in the relationship between ln-LBP and BUA. An association was observed for those weighing greater than 82.7 kg (β 3.366 ± 0.929, p < 0.001), after adjustment for potential covariates. Neither bone turnover marker was associated with ln-LBP.

Conclusion

Our data do not support a clear association between serum LBP and measures of bone health in this sample of men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability (data transparency)

Availability of data and material will be made available upon reasonable request.

Code availability (software application or custom code)

Not applicable.

References

  1. Vancamelbeke M, Vermeire S (2017) The intestinal barrier: a fundamental role in health and disease. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11(9):821–834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang N, Ma S, Fu L (2022) Gut microbiota dysbiosis as one cause of osteoporosis by impairing intestinal barrier function. Calcif Tissue Int 110(2):225–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Compston JE (2013) Bone: risk of osteoporotic fractures in irritable bowel syndrome. Nat Rev Endocrinol 9(1):8–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen D, Zhao CM (2011) The possible existence of a gut-bone axis suggested by studies of genetically manipulated mouse models? Curr Pharm Des 17(16):1552–1555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sjogren K, Engdahl C, Henning P, Lerner UH, Tremaroli V, Lagerquist MK et al (2012) The gut microbiota regulates bone mass in mice. J Bone Mineral Res 27(6):1357–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alexander C, Rietschel ET (2001) Bacterial lipopolysaccharides and innate immunity. J Endotoxin Res 7(3):167–202

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Triantafilou M, Triantafilou K (2002) Lipopolysaccharide recognition: CD14, TLRs and the LPS-activation cluster. Trends Immunol 23(6):301–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shuto T, Jimi E, Kukita T, Hirata M, Koga T (1994) Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced osteoclast-like cell formation in mouse bone marrow cultures. Endocrinology 134(2):831–837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schumann RR (2011) Old and new findings on lipopolysaccharide-binding protein: a soluble pattern-recognition molecule. Biochem Soc Trans 39(4):989–993

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nair SP, Meghji S, Wilson M, Reddi K, White P, Henderson B (1996) Bacterially induced bone destruction: mechanisms and misconceptions. Infect Immun 64(7):2371–2380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Scott EM, Gaywood I, Scott BB (2000) Guidelines for osteoporosis in coeliac disease and inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 46(suppl 1):I1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Frei P, Fried M, Hungerbuhler V, Rammert C, Rousson V, Kullak-Ublick GA (2006) Analysis of risk factors for low bone mineral density in inflammatory bowel disease. Digestion 73(1):40–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jahnsen J, Falch JA, Aadland E, Mowinckel P (1997) Bone mineral density is reduced in patients with Crohn’s disease but not in patients with ulcerative colitis: a population based study. Gut 40(3):313–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vestergaard P, Mosekilde L (2002) Fracture risk in patients with celiac Disease, Crohn’s disease, and ulcerative colitis: a nationwide follow-up study of 16,416 patients in Denmark. Am J Epidemiol 156(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Klaus J, Armbrecht G, Steinkamp M, Brückel J, Rieber A, Adler G et al (2002) High prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gut 51(5):654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Loftus EV Jr, Crowson CS, Sandborn WJ, Tremaine WJ, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ III (2002) Long-term fracture risk in patients with Crohn’s disease: a population-based study in Olmsted County. Minn Gastroenterol 123(2):468–475

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stobaugh DJ, Deepak P, Ehrenpreis ED (2013) Increased risk of osteoporosis-related fractures in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Osteoporos Int 24(4):1169–1175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zittel TT, Zeeb B, Maier GW, Kaiser GW, Zwirner M, Liebich H et al (1997) High prevalence of bone disorders after gastrectomy. Am J Surg 174(4):431–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hausmann E, Raisz LG, Miller WA (1970) Endotoxin: stimulation of bone resorption in tissue culture. Science 168(3933):862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hausmann E, Weinfeld N, Miller WA (1972) Effects of lipopolysaccharides on bone resorption in tissue culture. Calcif Tissue Res 9(1):272–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chiang C-Y, Kyritsis G, Graves DT, Amar S (1999) Interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor activities partially account for calvarial bone resorption induced by local injection of lipopolysaccharide. Infect Immun 67(8):4231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mormann M, Thederan M, Nackchbandi I, Giese T, Wagner C, Hansch GM (2008) Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) induce the differentiation of human monocytes to osteoclasts in a tumour necrosis factor (TNF) alpha-dependent manner: a link between infection and pathological bone resorption. Mol Immunol 45(12):3330–3337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zou W, Bar-Shavit Z (2002) Dual modulation of osteoclast differentiation by lipopolysaccharide. J Bone Mineral Res 17(7):1211–1218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kikuchi T, Matsuguchi T, Tsuboi N, Mitani A, Tanaka S, Matsuoka M et al (2001) Gene expression of osteoclast differentiation factor is induced by lipopolysaccharide in mouse osteoblasts via toll-like receptors. J Immunol 166(5):3574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kitaura H, Marahleh A, Ohori F, Noguchi T, Shen W-R, Qi J et al (2020) Osteocyte-related cytokines regulate osteoclast formation and bone resorption. Int J Mol Sci 21(14):5169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Li J-Y, Chassaing B, Tyagi AM, Vaccaro C, Luo T, Adams J et al (2016) Sex steroid deficiency–associated bone loss is microbiota dependent and prevented by probiotics. J Clin Investig 126(6):2049–2063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ke K, Arra M, Abu-Amer Y (2019) Mechanisms underlying bone loss associated with gut inflammation. Int J Mol Sci 20(24):6323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Matsumoto M, Horiuchi Y, Yamamoto A, Ochiai M, Niwa M, Takagi T et al (2010) Lipopolysaccaride-binding peptides obtained by phage display method. J Microbiol Methods 82(1):54–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pasco JA, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA (2012) Cohort profile: Geelong osteoporosis study. Int J Epidemiol 41(6):1565–1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Henry MJ, Pasco JA, Korn S, Gibson JE, Kotowicz MA, Nicholson GC (2010) Bone mineral density reference ranges for Australian men: Geelong osteoporosis study. Osteoporosis Int 21(6):909–917

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Economos CD, Sacheck JM, Wacker W, Shea K, Naumova EN (2007) Precision of lunar achilles+ bone quality measurements: time dependency and multiple machine use in field studies. Br J Radiol 80(959):919–925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Giles GG, Ireland PD (1996) Dietary questionnaire for epidemiological studies (version 2). melbourne: the Cancer Council Victoria

  33. Cohen J (2013) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences: Routledge

  34. Shieh A, Epeldegui M, Karlamangla AS, Greendale GA (2020) Gut permeability, inflammation, and bone density across the menopause transition. JCI Insight 5(2):12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wen W, Li Y, Cheng Y, He J, Jia R, Li C et al (2018) Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein is a sensitive disease activity biomarker for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 36(2):233–240

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ciregia F, Baiwir D, Cobraiville G, Dewael T, Mazzucchelli G, Badot V et al (2020) Glycosylation deficiency of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and corticosteroid-binding globulin associated with activity and response to treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. J Transl Med 18(1):8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen MF, Chang CH, Hu CC, Wu YY, Chang Y, Ueng SWN (2019) Periprosthetic joint infection caused by gram-positive versus gram-negative bacteria: lipopolysaccharide, but not lipoteichoic acid, exerts adverse osteoclast-mediated effects on the bone. J Clin Med 8(9):1289. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Qureshi ST, Larivière L, Leveque G, Clermont S, Moore KJ, Gros P et al (1999) Endotoxin-tolerant mice have mutations in Toll-like receptor 4 (Tlr4). J Exp Med 189(4):615–625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hou L, Sasaki H, Stashenko P (2000) Toll-like receptor 4-deficient mice have reduced bone destruction following mixed anaerobic infection. Infect Immun 68(8):4681–4687

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hersoug L-G, Møller P, Loft S (2018) Role of microbiota-derived lipopolysaccharide in adipose tissue inflammation, adipocyte size and pyroptosis during obesity. Nutr Res Rev 31(2):153–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Slavin JL (2005) Dietary fiber and body weight. Nutrition 21(3):411–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zaiss MM, Jones RM, Schett G, Pacifici R (2019) The gut-bone axis: how bacterial metabolites bridge the distance. J Clin Investig 129(8):3018–3028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. The Department of Health and Aged Care AG. Body mass index (BMI) and waist 2021. Available from: https://www.health.gov.au/health-topics/overweight-and-obesity/bmi-and-waist. Accessed 25 Apr 2021

  44. Gonzalez-Quintela A, Alonso M, Campos J, Vizcaino L, Loidi L, Gude F (2013) Determinants of serum concentrations of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) in the adult population: the role of obesity. PLoS ONE 8(1):e54600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Stehle JR Jr, Leng X, Kitzman DW, Nicklas BJ, Kritchevsky SB, High KP (2012) Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, a surrogate marker of microbial translocation, is associated with physical function in healthy older adults. J Gerontol: Series A 67(11):1212–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Seethaler B, Basrai M, Neyrinck AM, Nazare JA, Walter J, Delzenne NM et al (2021) Biomarkers for assessment of intestinal permeability in clinical practice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 321(1):G11–G17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kuzma JN, Hagman DK, Cromer G, Breymeyer KL, Roth CL, Foster-Schubert KE et al (2019) Intraindividual variation in markers of intestinal permeability and adipose tissue inflammation in healthy normal-weight to obese adults. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 28(3):610–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Parfitt AM (2002) Misconceptions (2): turnover is always higher in cancellous than in cortical bone. Bone 30(6):807–809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ott SM (2018) Cortical or Trabecular Bone: what’s the difference? Am J Nephrol 47(6):373–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Jia X, Yang R, Li J, Zhao L, Zhou X, Xu X (2021) Gut-bone axis: a non-negligible contributor to periodontitis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:752708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Zebaze RM, Ghasem-Zadeh A, Bohte A, Iuliano-Burns S, Seeman E, Price RI et al (2010) Intracortical remodelling and porosity in the distal radius and post-mortem femurs of women: a cross-sectional study. The Lancet 375(9727):1729–36–36

  52. Yip KHM, Zheng MH, Feng HT, Steer JH, Joyce DA, Xu J (2004) Sesquiterpene lactone parthenolide blocks lipopolysaccharide-induced osteolysis through the suppression of NF-κB activity. J Bone Mineral Res 19(11):1905–1916

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Barbara G, Cremon C, Carini G, Bellacosa L, Zecchi L, De Giorgio R et al (2011) The immune system in irritable bowel syndrome. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 17(4):349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Cremon C, Carini G, Wang B, Vasina V, Cogliandro RF, De Giorgio R et al (2011) Intestinal serotonin release, sensory neuron activation, and abdominal pain in irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 106(7):1290–1298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Yadav VK, Balaji S, Suresh PS, Liu XS, Lu X, Li Z et al (2010) Pharmacological inhibition of gut-derived serotonin synthesis is a potential bone anabolic treatment for osteoporosis. Nat Med 16(3):308–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Cui Y, Niziolek PJ, MacDonald BT, Alenina N, Matthes S, Jacobsen CM et al (2014) Reply to Lrp5 regulation of bone mass and gut serotonin synthesis. Nat Med 20(11):1229–1230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Manocha M, Khan WI (2012) Serotonin and GI disorders: an update on clinical and experimental studies. Clin Trans Gastroenterol 3:e13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Cox AJ, West NP, Cripps AW (2015) Obesity, inflammation, and the gut microbiota. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 3(3):207–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Mohammadreza Mohebbi for his statistical expertise and assistance.

The authors thank our valued study participants, in addition to the research staff for their efforts in recruiting participants and obtaining and processing the data.

The authors thank Professor Graham Giles of the Cancer Epidemiology Centre of The Cancer Council Victoria, for permission to use the Dietary Questionnaire for Epidemiological Studies (Version 2), Melbourne: The Cancer Council Victoria 1996.

Funding

The Geelong Osteoporosis Study was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australia (GNT251638, 299831, 628582, and 1104438). JRC and KBA were supported by Deakin University Postgraduate Scholarships, KLH-K by an Alfred Deakin Postdoctoral Research Fellowship, and LJW by a NHMRC Emerging Research Fellowship (1174060). The funding providers played no role in the design or conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or in preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Authors have made contributions to the following: (1) the conception and design of the study, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data, (2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, (3) final approval of the version to be submitted. The author statement outlines individual contributions to the paper from each author, using the relevant CRediT roles: conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; funding acquisition; investigation; methodology; project administration; resources; software; supervision; validation; visualization; roles/writing—original draft; writing—review and editing.

Authorship statements are formatted with the names of authors first and CRediT role(s) following. JRC: conceptualization, methodology, software, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, validation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization, project administration. JAP: conceptualization, resources, funding acquisition, writing—review and editing. CCB: methodology, resources, formal analysis, project administration, writing—review and editing. KLH-K: data curation, writing—review and editing. JMH: writing—review and editing, supervision. KBA: methodology, writing—review and editing. RMS: writing—review and editing, supervision. MAK: resources, writing—review and editing. LJW: conceptualization, formal analysis, resources, writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision, funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jasmine R. Cleminson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the Barwon Health Human Research Ethics Committee (ID 00/56).

Consent to participate

All participants provided written informed consent. All procedures performed in the work described, involving human participants, were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki), its later amendments, or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Barwon Health Human Research Ethics Committee. Privacy rights were observed for all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

Authors JRC, CCB, JMH, and RMS have no conflicts of interest to declare. JAP has recently received grant/research support from the NHMRC, the Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) Australia, Amgen, Deakin University, and the Norman Beischer Foundation. KLH-K has recently received grant/research support from Amgen and Deakin University. KBA has recently received an Australian Research Training Program Scholarship. MAK has recently received grant/research support from Amgen and the MRFF. LJW has received grant/research support from the NHMRC, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, The University of Melbourne, and Deakin University.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cleminson, J.R., Pasco, J.A., Bortolasci, C.C. et al. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and bone health: data from a population-based sample of men. Osteoporos Int 34, 309–317 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06602-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06602-9

Keywords

Navigation