Our findings demonstrate that a wide range of SCD bone morbidity can present in childhood, and we report successful pain management with IV bisphosphonate therapy. Vertebral deformities due to endplate infarction were the most common type of bone morbidity, followed by femoral head AVN, non-vertebral body skeletal infarcts, and humeral head AVN. We illustrate the diversity of non-vertebral body skeletal infarct locations in SCD including long bone diaphyses, vertebral posterior elements, pelvis, and cranial bones, including cases of a mandibular bone infarct that resulted in facial nerve palsy and an orbital infarct that led to a subgaleal hematoma (see Supplemental Data). Our findings of AVN in children with SCD are consistent with other reports demonstrating that AVN may present during childhood, including frequent bilateral joint involvement [5, 31,32,33]. In contrast to other reports, we found a greater proportion of children with vertebral deformities in our cohort.
We were also surprised to observe a large proportion of children with myositis as 19% of children with MRIs for AVN or bone infarct had local myositis over the area of bone disease. Myositis has been previously reported in SCD; however to our knowledge, our study is the first to describe myositis in children who underwent MRI for bone morbidity. The frequency of myositis seen on MRI demonstrates that such a finding may not be a rare complication, despite the sparsity of literature on this observation [14, 15]. CK is an enzyme released during muscle inflammation and elevated CK has been seen in SCD myositis [15, 16]. While CK was not frequently measured during vaso-occlusive episodes or during assessment of bone morbidity in our cohort, we describe one child with significantly elevated CK in the setting of multiple bone infarcts and overlying myositis. Further studies are needed to explore the frequency of myositis in vaso-occlusive episodes, the etiology of the myositis, the utility of CK as a marker of myositis in this setting, and whether myositis is associated with more severe bone morbidity.
At our institutions, IV bisphosphonate administration has become more widely used in SCD. We observed that IV bisphosphonates consistently improved or completely resolved pain in our cohort and were well tolerated. Importantly, our experience suggests that IV bisphosphonate therapy in SCD is safe as none of our patients experienced pain crises, hemolytic crises, stroke, or other sickle cell complications that might have been attributed to bisphosphonate administration. Although osteonecrosis of the jaw in children receiving IV bisphosphonate therapy has not been described, the possibility of spontaneous vaso-occlusive events of the jaw in sickle cell disease [34] merits prudence with respect to this theoretical complication. Dental extractions should be carried out prior to starting bisphosphonate therapy wherever possible, good oral hygiene and regular dental evaluations should be maintained, and monitoring for ONJ complications should be routine [35]. Bone histomorphometry in an adolescent before and after IV zoledronic acid therapy demonstrated a high rate of bone turnover that declined on IV bisphosphonate therapy, as expected given the drug’s mechanism of action. Cortical width increased by 16% in this older adolescent, in keeping with the known anti-resorptive effect of IV bisphosphonate therapy on the endocortical surface [36]. Children who had post-bisphosphonate BMDs did not demonstrate a significant aBMD increase. This may be expected as this group was nearing final adult height at completion of IV bisphosphonate therapy, and they still have SCD as an ongoing risk factor for osteoporosis.
Beyond the reduction of pain following IV bisphosphonate administration, we also observed spontaneous (that is, medication-unassisted) femoral head reshaping following AVN. Reshaping of both the femoral heads and vertebral bodies also occurred in two other children, both of whom had been treated with IV bisphosphonate therapy. IV bisphosphonate therapy promotes vertebral body reshaping in pediatric osteoporosis populations such as osteogenesis imperfecta and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (the latter only occurs if glucocorticoid therapy is withdrawn and normal growth resumes) [37,38,39]. Partial femoral head reshaping following AVN has been seen in a previous report of five children with SCD AVN, without medical or surgical intervention [40]. To our knowledge, our experience is the first report of vertebral body reshaping in SCD. These findings demonstrate the potential for structural improvement in SCD bone morbidity although it is unclear why some cases recover while others progress to further bone destruction. Overall, a larger prospective study is required to better understand the potential for recovery from structural collapse in pediatric SCD.
From a clinical perspective, the most important observation arising from our study is that IV bisphosphonates appeared to significantly reduce the severity of chronic bone pain in our cohort. Over 50% of adults with SCD will experience chronic pain with significant consequences including depression, anxiety, impaired sleep, and decreased quality of life [41]. Bone pain is a complex pathway involving increased osteoclast differentiation and activation, release of cytokines, recruitment of immune cells, local hydrogen ion production, and nociceptor sensitization [42,43,44,45]. As pyrophosphate analogues, bisphosphonates are taken up by osteoclasts causing osteoclast apoptosis, thereby suppressing pain arising from bone resorption while also decreasing osteoclast release of hydrogen ions and microenvironment acidification, an important sensitizer of nociceptor. In addition, bisphosphonates have immune-modulating actions including inhibition of macrophage activation interfering with pro-inflammatory mediators [42, 46]. The latter is presumed to be the primary mechanism of bisphosphonate-mediated bone analgesia.
Whether IV bisphosphonates can positively impact the evolution of the SCD itself remains to be explored. Vaso-occlusive crises, the clinical signature of SCD, are caused by Hb sickling in the microvasculature which leads to localized ischemia–reperfusion injury [2, 14, 16]. Skeletal vaso-occlusive episodes lead to inflammation and cytokine release, increased receptor-activator of nuclear factor kappa β ligand (RANKL) signalling, osteoclast recruitment, and osteoclast activation [47,48,49]. A mouse model of SCD showed increased osteoclast activity and recruitment as well as interleukin-6 production in response to hypoxia-reperfusion injury and osteoclast activity, and recruitment was markedly reduced by zoledronic acid [48]. Thus, vaso-occlusive episodes activate pathways, similar to those which trigger bone pain, providing rationale for future studies to explore the impact of IV bisphosphonates on the development of such sickle cell–related vaso-occlusive crises in murine and human models, and their impact on muscle and bone inflammatory and osteoclastogenesis pathways.
The limitations of this study include its retrospective design and therefore data collection challenges inherent to retrospective studies, as follows. First, referral practices for pain and bone morbidity assessments and consideration for IV bisphosphonate therapy were pursued more pro-actively at CHEO and CHU St. Justine compared with the Stollery Children’s Hospital. This reflected the fact that there were no specific referral guidelines in place at the Stollery Children’s Hospital until after this study was completed. These differences in referral/practice patterns introduced heterogeneity into the number of patients who were treated with IV bisphosphonates across the three centers. In addition, reports of pain were not assessed in a standardized fashion across the three centers and there was a lack of consistent objective pain score data. As a result, our study provides a description of the potential bone morbidities that can arise from pediatric SCD, their frequencies, and their response to IV bisphosphonate therapy as evaluated pragmatically during routine clinical care. Ultimately, a randomized controlled trial would be necessary to definitively determine whether IV bisphosphonates have measurable benefit to skeletal health compared with disease-targeted treatment alone.
Another consideration in the interpretation of our results is that the chart review encompassed 20 years of clinical care, and practice has changed significantly over that period. Hydroxyurea has more widely become a standard of care and most children with recurrent pain crises receive this therapy. Since 2014, it has further been recommended to introduce hydroxyurea by 9–12 months of age even in the absence of symptoms [9]. It remains uncertain, however, whether hydroxyurea alters the bone morbidity trajectory in SCD. In particular, there are conflicting reports on whether hydroxyurea may be associated with reduced or increased risk of AVN [8, 50, 51]. In addition, new therapies for SCD are on the forefront, including gene therapy (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03282656), and some patients undergo bone marrow transplant. The impact of these targeted approaches on bone morbidity also requires further study. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is an evolving curative therapy for SCD, and gene therapy trials are investigating the infusion of modified autologous stem cells that express anti-sickling beta globulins. It remains to be seen if these curative therapies could modify the course of bone morbidity in SCD [52].
The observations in this study have important implications for clinical care of children with SCD, as they suggest the need for early and ongoing monitoring for bone morbidity. The possibility of spontaneous femoral head and vertebral body reshaping in this population warrants further understanding around which children have the potential for structural recovery, and the safety of IV bisphosphonate therapy in children with SCD at published doses is supported by our report. Moreover, these data suggest IV bisphosphonates have a positive effect on the treatment of painful bone morbidity, an observation that requires further testing in a randomized, controlled setting.