Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sarcopenia, osteoporosis, and fractures: what we see mainly depends on how we look?

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 05 December 2022

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Harris RJ, Parimi N, Cawthon PM, Strotmeyer ES, Boudreau RM, Brach JS et al (2022) Associations of components of sarcopenia with risk of fracture in the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study. Osteoporos Int (In Press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06390-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang L, Guo L, Wu H, Gong X, Lv J, Yang Y (2019) Role of physical performance measures for identifying functional disability among Chinese older adults: data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. PLoS ONE 14:e0215693. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chou MY, Nishita Y, Nakagawa T, Tange C, Tomida M, Shimokata H et al (2019) Role of gait speed and grip strength in predicting 10-year cognitive decline among community-dwelling older people. BMC Geriatr 19:186. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1199-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Studenski SA, Peters KW, Alley DE, Cawthon PM, McLean RR, Harris TB et al (2014) The FNIH sarcopenia project: rationale, study description, conference recommendations, and final estimates. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 69:547–558. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glu010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T et al (2019) Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 48:16–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afz046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kara M, Kaymak B, Frontera W, Ata AM, Ricci V, Ekiz T, et al (2021) Diagnosing sarcopenia: Functional perspectives and a new algorithm from the ISarcoPRM. J Rehabil Med 53:jrm00209. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2851

  7. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F et al (2010) Sarcopenia: European consensus definition and diagnosis: report of the European Working Group on sarcopenia in older people. Age Aging 39:412–423. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afq034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Spruit MA, Sillen MJ, Groenen MT, Wouters EF, Franssen FM (2013) New normative values for handgrip strength: results from the UK Biobank. J Am Med Dir Assoc 14:775.e5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2013.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Kara.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kara, M., Özçakar, L. Sarcopenia, osteoporosis, and fractures: what we see mainly depends on how we look?. Osteoporos Int 34, 425–426 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06418-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06418-7

Navigation