Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accurate estimation of vertebral fracture prevalence on lateral spine imaging requires use of validated ascertainment methods

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 18 March 2022

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Dussault PM, McCarthy D, Davis SA, Thakore-James M, Lazzari AA (2021) High prevalence of vertebral fractures in seizure patients with normal bone density receiving chronic anti-epileptic drugs. Osteoporos Int 32:2051–2059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Diacinti D, Guglielmi G (2019) How to define an osteoporotic vertebral fracture? Quant Imaging Med Surg 9:1485–1494

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrar L, Jiang G, Schousboe JT, DeBold CR, Eastell R (2008) Algorithm-based qualitative and semiquantitative identification of prevalent vertebral fracture: agreement between different readers, imaging modalities, and diagnostic approaches. J Bone Miner Res 23:417–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jiang G, Eastell R, Barrington NA, Ferrar L (2004) Comparison of methods for the visual identification of prevalent vertebral fracture in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 15:887–896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lentle BC, Berger C, Probyn L et al (2018) Comparative analysis of the radiology of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in women and men: cross-sectional and longitudinal observations from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). J Bone Miner Res 33:569–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Oei L, Koromani F, Breda SJ et al (2018) Osteoporotic vertebral fracture prevalence varies widely between qualitative and quantitative radiological assessment methods: the Rotterdam study. J Bone Miner Res 33:560–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schousboe JT, Lix LM, Morin SN et al (2019) Prevalent vertebral fracture on bone density lateral spine (VFA) images in routine clinical practice predict incident fractures. Bone 121:72–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Prince RL, Lewis JR, Lim WH et al (2019) Adding lateral spine imaging for vertebral fractures to densitometric screening: improving ascertainment of patients at high risk of incident osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 34:282–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. T. Schousboe.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schousboe, J.T., Binkley, N. & Leslie, W.D. Accurate estimation of vertebral fracture prevalence on lateral spine imaging requires use of validated ascertainment methods. Osteoporos Int 33, 1181–1182 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-06275-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-06275-w

Navigation