Abstract
Summary
Opportunistic osteoporosis screening involves measuring the attenuation of L1 vertebrae on abdominal computed tomography (CT), which correlates with DXA T-score. We found that this approach is useful for detecting low bone mass in patients with diabetes and propose L1 attenuation ≤ 135 Hounsfield units (HU) as a threshold for which DXA should be strongly considered.
Introduction
Attenuation of the L1 vertebrae on computer tomography (CT) images done for other reasons (“Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening”) has been found to correlate well with DXA-derived T-score. However, the method and the thresholds have never been tested specifically in those with diabetes mellitus (DM), in whom the fracture risk is greater than explained by BMD.
Methods
In a retrospective study of subjects with DM who had both abdominal CT and DXA within 6 months of each other, we compared L1 attenuation and DXA T-score to define the sensitivity and specificity of thresholds previously established in the general population.
Results
There were 313 subjects among whom 18 (5.8%) had prior major osteoporotic fracture (MOF). Subjects with MOF had lower T-scores (− 2.3 ± 1.4 vs. − 0.9 ± 1.4, p < 0.001) and L1 attenuation (104 HU ± 46 vs. 149 HU ± 47, p < 0.001) than non-fracture subjects. L1 attenuation ≤ 160 HU was 91% sensitive for osteoporosis, while ≤ 110 HU was 80% specific. For a higher T-score of ≤ − 1.5, L1 attenuation ≤ 135 HU showed balanced sensitivity and specificity (65% and 69%, respectively).
Conclusion
Opportunistic osteoporosis screening with abdominal CT is useful in determining the need for DXA screening in subjects with diabetes. We propose L1 attenuation ≤ 135 HU as a reasonable threshold for detecting the T-score of ≤ − 1.5, which is likely associated with increased fragility in DM.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schwartz AV, Sellmeyer DE, Ensrud KE, Cauley JA, Tabor HK, Schreiner PJ, Jamal SA, Black DM, Cummings SR, Study of Osteoporotic Features Research Group (2001) Older women with diabetes have an increased risk of fracture: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:32–38
Strotmeyer ES, Cauley JA, Schwartz AV, Nevitt MC, Resnick HE, Bauer DC, Tylavsky FA, de Rekeneire N, Harris TB, Newman AB (2005) Nontraumatic fracture risk with diabetes mellitus and impaired fasting glucose in older white and black adults: the health, aging, and body composition study. Arch Intern Med 165:1612–1617
Giangregorio LM, Leslie WD, Lix LM, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E, Kanis JA (2012) FRAX underestimates fracture risk in patients with diabetes. J Bone Miner Res 27:301–308
Ferrari SL, Abrahamsen B, Napoli N et al (2018) Diagnosis and management of bone fragility in diabetes: an emerging challenge. Osteoporos Int 29:2585–2596
American Diabetes Association (2020) Comprehensive, medical evaluation and assessment of comorbidities: standards of medical care in diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care 43:S37
Gillespie CW, Morin PE (2017) Trends and disparities in osteoporosis screening among women in the United States, 2008-2014. Am J Med 130:306–316
Pickhardt PJ, Pooler BD, Lauder T, del Rio AM, Bruce RJ, Binkley N (2013) Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal computed tomography scans obtained for other indications. Ann Intern Med 158:588–595
Romme EA, Murchison JT, Phang KF et al (2012) Bone attenuation on routine chest CT correlates with bone mineral density on DXA in patients with COPD. J Bone Miner Res 27:2338–2343
Buckens CF, Dijkhuis G, de Keizer B, Verhaar HJ, de Jong PA (2015) Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study. Eur Radiol 25:2074–2079
Alacreu E, Moratal D, Arana E (2017) Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis by routine CT in Southern Europe. Osteoporos Int 28:983–990
Schwartz AV, Vittinghoff E, Bauer DC, Hillier TA, Strotmeyer ES, Ensrud KE, Donaldson MG, Cauley JA, Harris TB, Koster A, Womack CR, Palermo L, Black DM, Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) Research Group, Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Research Group, Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) Research Group (2011) Association of BMD and FRAX score with risk of fracture in older adults with type 2 diabetes. Jama 305:2184–2192
Leslie WD, Johansson H, McCloskey EV et al (2018) Comparison of methods for improving fracture risk assessment in diabetes: the Manitoba BMD registry. J Bone Miner Res 33:1923–1930
Lee SJ, Binkley N, Lubner MG, Bruce RJ, Ziemlewicz TJ, Pickhardt PJ (2016) Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using the sagittal reconstruction from routine abdominal CT for combined assessment of vertebral fractures and density. Osteoporos Int 27:1131–1136
Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148
Delmas PD, Genant HK, Crans GG, Stock JL, Wong M, Siris E, Adachi JD (2003) Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial. Bone 33:522–532
Levin A, Stevens PE, Bilous RW et al (2013) Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl 3:1–150
Jain RK, Weiner MG, Zhao H, Williams KJ, Vokes T (2019) Diabetes-related fracture risk is different in African Americans compared with Hispanics and Caucasians. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 104:5729–5736
Graffy PM, Lee SJ, Ziemlewicz TJ, Pickhardt PJ (2017) Prevalence of vertebral compression fractures on routine CT scans according to L1 trabecular attenuation: determining relevant thresholds for opportunistic osteoporosis screening. Am J Roentgenol 209:491–496
Lee SJ, Graffy PM, Zea RD, Ziemlewicz TJ, Pickhardt PJ (2018) Future osteoporotic fracture risk related to lumbar vertebral trabecular attenuation measured at routine body CT. J Bone Miner Res 33:860–867
Pasco JA, Seeman E, Henry MJ, Merriman EN, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA (2006) The population burden of fractures originates in women with osteopenia, not osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17:1404–1409
Cho HJ, Morey V, Kang JY, Kim KW, Kim TK (2015) Prevalence and risk factors of spine, shoulder, hand, hip, and knee osteoarthritis in community-dwelling Koreans older than age 65 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:3307–3314
Yu EW, Thomas BJ, Brown JK, Finkelstein JS (2012) Simulated increases in body fat and errors in bone mineral density measurements by DXA and QCT. J Bone Miner Res 27:119–124
Binkley N, Krueger D, Vallarta-Ast N (2003) An overlying fat panniculus affects femur bone mass measurement. J Clin Densitom 6:199–204
Evans EM, Mojtahedi MC, Kessinger RB, Misic MM (2006) Simulated change in body fatness affects Hologic QDR 4500A whole body and central DXA bone measures. J Clin Densitom 9:315–322
Anderson PA, Polly DW, Binkley NC, Pickhardt PJ (2018) Clinical use of opportunistic computed tomography screening for osteoporosis. JBJS 100:2073–2081
Pickhardt PJ, Lauder T, Pooler BD, Muñoz del Rio A, Rosas H, Bruce RJ, Binkley N (2016) Effect of IV contrast on lumbar trabecular attenuation at routine abdominal CT: correlation with DXA and implications for opportunistic osteoporosis screening. Osteoporos Int 27:147–152
Pompe E, Willemink MJ, Dijkhuis GR, Verhaar HJJ, Hoesein FAAM, de Jong PA (2015) Intravenous contrast injection significantly affects bone mineral density measured on CT. Eur Radiol 25:283–289
Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK et al (2018) Screening for osteoporosis to prevent fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Jama 319:2521–2531
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
Rajesh K Jain receives research support from the Amgen Foundation.
Eunjae Lee, Christine Mathai, Farouk Dako, Preethi Gogineni, and Mark G Weiner have nothing to disclose.
Tamara Vokes is an investigator, consultant, and speaker for Radius, investigator and consultant for Takeda, and investigator for Ascendis.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOC 37 kb)
Supplemental Fig. 1
Receiver operating curve for predicting “moderate osteopenia” by bone mineral density using L1 attenuation by CT (PNG 6662 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jain, R., Lee, E., Mathai, C. et al. Using opportunistic screening with abdominal CT to identify osteoporosis and osteopenia in patients with diabetes. Osteoporos Int 31, 2189–2196 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05521-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05521-x