Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of a resistance and balance exercise programme on physical fitness, health-related quality of life and fear of falling in older women with osteoporosis and vertebral fracture: a randomized controlled trial

Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 27 April 2020

This article has been updated



Exercise is recommended for people with osteoporosis, but the effect for people who have suffered vertebral fracture is uncertain. This study shows that a multicomponent exercise-program based on recommendations for people with osteoporosis improved muscle strength, balance, and fear of falling in older women with osteoporosis and vertebral fracture.


Guidelines for exercise strongly recommend that older adults with osteoporosis or osteoporotic vertebral fracture should engage in a multicomponent exercise programme that includes resistance training in combination with balance training. Prior research is scarce and shows inconsistent findings. This study examines whether current exercise guidelines for osteoporosis, when applied to individuals with vertebral fractures, can improve health outcomes.


This single blinded randomized controlled trial included 149 older women diagnosed with osteoporosis and vertebral fracture, 65+ years. The intervention group performed a 12-week multicomponent exercise programme, the control group received usual care. Primary outcome was habitual walking speed, secondary outcomes were physical fitness (Senior Fitness Test, Functional Reach and Four Square Step Test), health-related quality of life and fear of falling. Descriptive data was reported as mean (standard deviation) and count (percent). Data were analyzed following intention to treat principle and per protocol. Between-group differences were assessed using linear regression models (ANCOVA analysis).


No statistically significant difference between the groups were found on the primary outcome, walking speed (mean difference 0.04 m/s, 95% CI − 0.01–0.09, p = 0.132). Statistically significant between-group differences in favour of intervention were found on FSST (dynamic balance) (mean difference − 0.80 s, 95% CI − 1.57 to − 0.02, p = 0.044), arm curl (mean difference 1.55, 95% CI 0.49–2.61, p = 0.005) and 30-s STS (mean difference 1.85, 95% CI 1.04–2.67, p < 0.001), as well as fear of falling (mean difference − 1.45, 95% CI − 2.64 to − 0.26, p = 0.018). No statistically significant differences between the groups were found on health-related quality of life.


Twelve weeks of a supervised multicomponent resistance and balance exercise programme improves muscle strength and balance and reduces fear of falling, in women with osteoporosis and a history of vertebral fractures.

Trial registration Identifier: NCT02781974. Registered 25.05.16. Retrospectively registered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 27 April 2020

    The original version of this article, published on 10 January 2020, contained a mistake. An author’s name was misspelled.


  1. Cauley JA (2013) Public health impact of osteoporosis. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 68(10):1243–1251.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergard M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J, McCloskey EV, Jonsson B, Kanis JA (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the international Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 8:136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY (2019) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 30(1):3–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pietschmann P, Rauner M, Sipos W, Kerschan-Schindl K (2009) Osteoporosis: an age-related and gender-specific disease--a mini-review. Gerontology 55(1):3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kendler DL, Bauer DC, Davison KS, Dian L, Hanley DA, Harris ST, McClung MR, Miller PD, Schousboe JT, Yuen CK, Lewiecki EM (2016) Vertebral fractures: clinical importance and management. Am J Med 129(2):221.e221–221.e210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McDaniels-Davidson C, Davis A, Wing D, Macera C, Lindsay SP, Schousboe JT, Nichols JF, Kado DM (2018) Kyphosis and incident falls among community-dwelling older adults. Osteoporos Int 29(1):163–169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Adachi JD, Adami S, Gehlbach S, Anderson FA Jr, Boonen S, Chapurlat RD, Compston JE, Cooper C, Delmas P, Diez-Perez A, Greenspan SL, Hooven FH, LaCroix AZ, Lindsay R, Netelenbos JC, Wu O, Pfeilschifter J, Roux C, Saag KG, Sambrook PN, Silverman S, Siris ES, Nika G, Watts NB (2010) Impact of prevalent fractures on quality of life: baseline results from the global longitudinal study of osteoporosis in women. Mayo Clin Proc 85(9):806–813.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gold DT (2001) The nonskeletal consequences of osteoporotic fractures. Psychologic and social outcomes. Rheum Dis Clin N Am 27(1):255–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Reventlow SD (2007) Perceived risk of osteoporosis: restricted physical activities? Qualitative interview study with women in their sixties. Scand J Prim Health Care 25(3):160–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lips P, van Schoor NM (2005) Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 16(5):447–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hallberg I, Bachrach-Lindstrom M, Hammerby S, Toss G, Ek AC (2009) Health-related quality of life after vertebral or hip fracture: a seven-year follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gibbs JC, MacIntyre NJ, Ponzano M, Templeton JA, Thabane L, Papaioannou A, Giangregorio LM (2019) Exercise for improving outcomes after osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:Cd008618.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vieira ER, Palmer RC, Chaves PH (2016) Prevention of falls in older people living in the community. BMJ (Clin Res ed) 353:i1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Olsen CF, Bergland A (2014) The effect of exercise and education on fear of falling in elderly women with osteoporosis and a history of vertebral fracture: results of a randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 25(8):2017–2025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Giangregorio LM, Papaioannou A, Macintyre NJ, Ashe MC, Heinonen A, Shipp K, Wark J, McGill S, Keller H, Jain R, Laprade J, Cheung AM (2014) Too fit to fracture: exercise recommendations for individuals with osteoporosis or osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 25(3):821–835.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bergland A, Thorsen H, Karesen R (2011) Effect of exercise on mobility, balance, and health-related quality of life in osteoporotic women with a history of vertebral fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 22(6):1863–1871.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Middleton A, Fritz SL, Lusardi M (2015) Walking speed: the functional vital sign. J Aging Phys Act 23(2):314–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D (2010) CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med 8:18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chodzko-Zajko WJ, Proctor DN, Fiatarone Singh MA, Minson CT, Nigg CR, Salem GJ, Skinner JS (2009) American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41(7):1510–1530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bonaiuti D, Arioli G, Diana G, Franchignoni F, Giustini A, Monticone M, Negrini S, Maini M (2005) SIMFER rehabilitation treatment guidelines in postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis. Eura Medicophys 41(4):315–337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Syddall H, Cooper C, Sayer AA (2011) A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing 40(4):423–429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sinaki M (2012) Exercise for patients with osteoporosis: management of vertebral compression fractures and trunk strengthening for fall prevention. PM R 4(11):882–888.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kunutsor SK, Leyland S, Skelton DA, James L, Cox M, Gibbons N, Whitney J, Clark EM (2018) Adverse events and safety issues associated with physical activity and exercise for adults with osteoporosis and osteopenia: a systematic review of observational studies and an updated review of interventional studies.

  24. Borg GA (1982) Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14(5):377–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stanghelle B, Bentzen H, Giangregorio L, Pripp AH, Bergland A (2018) Effect of a resistance and balance exercise programme for women with osteoporosis and vertebral fracture: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19(1):100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Slade SC, Dionne CE, Underwood M, Buchbinder R (2016) Consensus on exercise reporting template (CERT): explanation and elaboration statement. Br J Sports Med 50(23):1428–1437.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dite W, Temple VA (2002) A clinical test of stepping and change of direction to identify multiple falling older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83(11):1566–1571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, Studenski S (1990) Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol 45(6):M192–M197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rikli RE, Jones CJ, Hanson T (2004) Senior fitness test : fysisk formåen hos ældre : manual og referenceværdier. Senior fitness test manual, human kinetics. FADL’s Forlag, København

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ware JE Jr (2000) SF-36 health survey update. Spine 25(24):3130–3139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, Caulin F, Egger P, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Kellingray S, Leplege A, Liberman UA, McCloskey E, Minne H, Reeve J, Reginster JY, Scholz M, Todd C, de Vernejoul MC, Wiklund I (1999) Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Working Party for Quality of Life of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 10(2):150–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Helbostad JL, Taraldsen K, Granbo R, Yardley L, Todd CJ, Sletvold O (2010) Validation of the falls efficacy scale-international in fall-prone older persons. Age Ageing 39(2):259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P (2003) International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35(8):1381–1395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA (2006) Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 54(5):743–749.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bjerk M, Brovold T, Skelton DA, Liu-Ambrose T, Bergland A (2019) Effects of a falls prevention exercise programme on health-related quality of life in older home care recipients: a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing.

  36. Evstigneeva L, Lesnyak O, Bultink IE, Lems WF, Kozhemyakina E, Negodaeva E, Guselnikova G, Belkin A (2016) Effect of twelve-month physical exercise program on patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a randomized, controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 27(8):2515–2524.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Halvarsson A, Franzen E, Stahle A (2015) Balance training with multi-task exercises improves fall-related self-efficacy, gait, balance performance and physical function in older adults with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 29(4):365–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gibbs JC (2018) Effect of home exercise on functional performance, posture, quality of life and pain in older women with vertebral fractures: a pilot feasibility trial. Paper presented at the Journal of bone and mineral research: JBMR

  39. Wade DT (1992) Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  40. Moreland JD, Richardson JA, Goldsmith CH, Clase CM (2004) Muscle weakness and falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 52(7):1121–1129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Metter EJ, Conwit R, Tobin J, Fozard JL (1997) Age-associated loss of power and strength in the upper extremities in women and men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 52(5):B267–B276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gianoudis J, Bailey CA, Ebeling PR, Nowson CA, Sanders KM, Hill K, Daly RM (2014) Effects of a targeted multimodal exercise program incorporating high-speed power training on falls and fracture risk factors in older adults: a community-based randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res 29(1):182–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Delbaere K, Crombez G, Vanderstraeten G, Willems T, Cambier D (2004) Fear-related avoidance of activities, falls and physical frailty. A prospective community-based cohort study. Age Ageing 33(4):368–373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. De Amici D, Klersy C, Ramajoli F, Brustia L (2000) More about the Hawthorne effect. Anesth Analg 91(4):1043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pacala JT, Judge JO, Boult C (1996) Factors affecting sample selection in a randomized trial of balance enhancement: the FICSIT study. J Am Geriatr Soc 44(4):377–382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to the participants for their contribution to the study and to the physiotherapists involved in the intervention and testing of the participants.


The study received internal funding from OsloMet-Oslo Metropolitan University. The funding body has no role in the design of the study, writing the manuscript, collecting data, analysis and interpretation of data. The study has no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Stanghelle.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest


Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study has been approved by The Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics in South East Norway (Ref. 2014/2050).

Informed consent

Written, informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material


(DOCX 34 kb)


(DOCX 45 kb)


(DOCX 19 kb)


(DOC 233 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stanghelle, B., Bentzen, H., Giangregorio, L. et al. Effects of a resistance and balance exercise programme on physical fitness, health-related quality of life and fear of falling in older women with osteoporosis and vertebral fracture: a randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 31, 1069–1078 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: