Osteoporosis and osteopenia in the distal forearm predict all-cause mortality independent of grip strength: 22-year follow-up in the population-based Tromsø Study
Low bone mineral density (BMD) gives an increased risk of fractures, which can lead to premature death. Can BMD of the wrist predict mortality? BMD consistent with osteopenia and osteoporosis gave a significantly increased risk of death for both men and women in a general population in Tromsø, Norway.
To investigate if bone mineral density (BMD) levels of the distal forearm, consistent with osteopenia and osteoporosis, can predict mortality and if grip strength is an effect modifier.
The study population constituted 6565 participants aged 50–79 years at baseline in the Tromsø Study wave 4 conducted in 1994–1995. Forearm BMD measured by SXA was categorized as “normal,” “osteopenia,” or “osteoporosis” following WHO’s definition. Cox regression with all-cause mortality as the outcome over 22 years of follow-up was performed for men and women separately, adjusting for health-related factors, as well as BMD by grip strength interaction. A secondary analysis with a 15-year follow-up also adjusted for hip fractures and osteoporotic fractures.
During follow-up, 3176 of participants died (47%). Those categorized as osteoporotic had higher mortality hazard ratio (HR) compared to those with normal BMD; men HR = 1.37 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19, 1.58) and women HR = 1.32 (1.14, 1.53) were adjusted for age, body mass index, physical activity, smoking habits, education, health status, chronic diseases, and grip strength. Corresponding HRs for osteopenia were men HR = 1.13 (1.00, 1.27) and women HR = 1.17 (1.01, 1.35). Further adjustments for fractures did only marginally attenuate the results, and HRs were still significant. There was no grip strength by BMD interaction.
Men and women with low distal forearm BMD values, consistent with osteoporosis or osteopenia, had an increased mortality compared to normal BMD participants. High grip strength did not modify this association, and the association remained after adjustment for a range of health-related factors.
KeywordsBone mineral density Grip strength Hip fracture Mortality Osteoporosis Osteopenia
No external funding has been received to finance this project. The manuscript will be part of Annette V. Hauger’s Ph.d thesis and is internally funded by Oslo Metropolitan University.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
- 11.Lenchik L, Register TC, Hsu F-C, Xu J, Smith SC, Carr JJ, Freedman BI, Bowden DW (2017) Bone mineral density of the radius predicts all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: diabetes heart study. J Clin DensitomGoogle Scholar
- 16.Loprinzi PD, Addoh O (2017) Accelerometer-determined physical activity and all-cause mortality in a National Prospective Cohort Study of Adults Post-Acute Stroke. Am J Health Promot 0890117117720061Google Scholar
- 29.Grey A, Bolland M (2013) The effect of treatments for osteoporosis on mortality. Osteoporosis International 1-6Google Scholar
- 32.Berntsen GKR, Fønnebø V, Tollan A, Søgaard AJ, Magnus JH (2001) Forearm bone mineral density by age in 7,620 men and women the Tromsø Study, a population-based study. Am J Epidemiol 153Google Scholar
- 36.Hassan E (2006) Recall bias can be a threat to retrospective and prospective research designs. Internet J Epidemiol 3:339–412Google Scholar
- 37.Van de Mortel TF (2008) Faking it: social desirability response bias in self-report research. Aust J Adv Nurs 25:40Google Scholar
- 38.Norwegian Cause of Death Registry (2017) Dødsårsakregisteret - Statistikkbank. Norwegian Institute of Public Health http://statistikkbank.fhi.no/dar/. Accessed 28 June 2018
- 42.Seeman E (2004) Treatment of osteoporosis-why, whom, when and how to treat. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 6:60Google Scholar
- 46.Kelsey JL, Browner WS, Seeley DG, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR, Group SoOFR (1992) Risk factors for fractures of the distal forearm and proximal humerus. Am J Epidemiol 135:477–489Google Scholar