Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relationship of American Indian blood quantum with osteoporosis risk: a cross-sectional study of American Indian women in Oklahoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Information regarding the prevalence and risk of osteoporosis among American Indian (AI) women is limited. This study showed that with increasing AI blood quantum, the prevalence of osteoporosis at the hip based on BMD T-scores decreased and this appeared to be independent of other risk factors.

Introduction

This study was designed to investigate the effects of AI blood quantum (BQ) on osteoporosis prevalence and risk in a cohort of AI women in Oklahoma.

Methods

Women (n = 301), aged 50 years and older, were recruited to participate in the Oklahoma American Indian Women’s Osteoporosis Study. Baseline bone density, fracture history, bone biochemical markers, and potential risk factors were assessed. Participants were stratified by AI BQ into BQ1 ≤ 25%, BQ2 = 25–49%, BQ3 = 50–74%, and BQ4 = 75–100%. The effects of BQ on the prevalence and risk of osteoporosis were evaluated.

Results

Based on T-scores, one in approximately eight women in the study was osteoporotic at one or more sites. The prevalence of osteoporosis decreased (p < 0.05) with increasing BQ, especially at the hip, trochanteric, and intertrochanter regions. No differences in bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and C-telopeptide were observed across BQ that could account for the differences in bone density. 25-OH vitamin D decreased with increasing BQ, but mean for each BQ1–4 was > 40 ng/mL. Fracture history did not differ across BQ, and though 52% of the population consumed less than the RDA for calcium, no effect of BQ was observed.

Conclusions

In this cohort of women who identified as AI, greater Indian BQ was associated with a decrease in the prevalence of osteoporosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnell O, Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17:1726–1733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Seeman E (1994) Reduced bone density in women with fractures: contribution of low peak bone density and rapid bone loss. Osteoporos Int 4(Suppl 1):15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Khosla S, Riggs BL (2005) Pathophysiology of age-related bone loss and osteoporosis. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am 34:1015–1030 xi

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Weaver CM, Gordon CM, Janz KF, Kalkwarf HJ, Lappe JM, Lewis R, O'Karma M, Wallace TC, Zemel BS (2016) The National Osteoporosis Foundation's position statement on peak bone mass development and lifestyle factors: a systematic review and implementation recommendations. Osteoporos Int 27:1281–1386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Riggs BL, Khosla S, Melton LJ, III. Sex steroids and the construction and conservation of the adult skeleton. Endocr Rev 2002; 23: 279–302

  6. Walker MD, Novotny R, Bilezikian JP, Weaver CM (2008) Race and diet interactions in the acquisition, maintenance, and loss of bone. J Nutr 138:1256S–1260S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cummings SR, Melton LJ (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359:1761–1767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu L, Lu A, Zhao X, Chen X, Cummings SR (1996) Very low rates of hip fracture in Beijing, People's Republic of China the Beijing osteoporosis project. Am J Epidemiol 144:901–907

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Barrett-Connor E, Siris ES, Wehren LE, Miller PD, Abbott TA, Berger ML, Santora AC, Sherwood LM (2005) Osteoporosis and fracture risk in women of different ethnic groups. J Bone Miner Res 20:185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wampler NS, Chen Z, Jacobsen C, Henderson JA, Howard BV, Rossouw JE (2005) Bone mineral density of American Indian and Alaska native women compared with non-Hispanic white women: results from the Women's Health Initiative study. Menopause 12:536–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Perry HM III, Bernard M, Horowitz M, Miller DK, Fleming S, Baker MZ, Flaherty J, Purushothaman R, Hajjar R, Kaiser FE, Patrick P, Morley JE (1998) The effect of aging on bone mineral metabolism and bone mass in native American women. J Am Geriatr Soc 46:1418–1422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Taylor CA, Keim KS, Gilmore AC (2005) Impact of core and secondary foods on nutritional composition of diets in native-American women. J Am Diet Assoc 105:413–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ballew C, White LL, Strauss KF, Benson LJ, Mendlein JM, Mokdad AH (1997) Intake of nutrients and food sources of nutrients among the Navajo: findings from the Navajo health and nutrition survey. J Nutr 127:2085S–2093S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolfe WS, Sanjur D (1988) Contemporary diet and body weight of Navajo women receiving food assistance: an ethnographic and nutritional investigation. J Am Diet Assoc 88:822–827

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson JD, Simoons FJ, Hurwitz R, Grange A, Sinatra FR, Sunshine P, Robertson WV, Bennett PH, Kretchmer N (1978) Lactose malabsorption among adult Indians of the Great Basin and American southwest. Am J Clin Nutr 31:381–387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weiler HA, Leslie WD, Krahn J, Steiman PW, Metge CJ (2007) Canadian aboriginal women have a higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency than non-aboriginal women despite similar dietary vitamin D intakes. J Nutr 137:461–465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ritterhouse LL, Lu R, Shah HB, Robertson JM, Fife DA, Maecker HT, Du H, Fathman CG, Chakravarty EF, Scofield RH, Kamen DL, Guthridge JM, James JA (2014) Vitamin d deficiency in a multiethnic healthy control cohort and altered immune response in vitamin D deficient European-American healthy controls. PLoS One 9:e94500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2015) Current cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2005–2014. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 64:1233–1240

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hutchinson RN, Shin S (2014) Systematic review of health disparities for cardiovascular diseases and associated factors among American Indian and Alaska native populations. PLoS One 9:e80973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Federal Register (2010) 75: 60810–60814

  21. Sebring NG, Denkinger BI, Menzie CM, Yanoff LB, Parikh SJ, Yanovski JA (2007) Validation of three food frequency questionnaires to assess dietary calcium intake in adults. J Am Diet Assoc 107:752–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP, Johnston CC Jr, Lindsay R (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. U.S. Census Bureau (2016) U.S.Department of Commerce

    Google Scholar 

  24. Okorodudu DO, Jumean MF, Montori VM, Romero-Corral A, Somers VK, Erwin PJ, Lopez-Jimenez F (2010) Diagnostic performance of body mass index to identify obesity as defined by body adiposity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes 34:791–799

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. U.S. Dietary Guidelines (2015) U.S.Department of Health and Human Services and U.S.Department of Agriculture

    Google Scholar 

  26. (2011) Institute of Medicine, Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium, Food and Nutrition Board, Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D

  27. Frech T, Ma KN, Ferrucci ED, Lanier AP, McFadden M, Tom-Orme L, Slattery ML, Murtaugh MA (2012) Prevalence of fracture and osteoporosis risk factors in American Indian and Alaska native people. J Health Care Poor Underserved 23:1157–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Indian Health Services, Indian Health Manual. 2016; Part 2

  29. Fantuzzi G (2005) Adipose tissue, adipokines, and inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 115:911–919

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Balluz LS, Okoro CA, Mokdad A (2008) Association between selected unhealthy lifestyle factors, body mass index, and chronic health conditions among individuals 50 years of age or older, by race/ethnicity. Ethn Dis 18:450–457

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Leslie WD, Derksen S, Prior HJ, Lix LM, Metge C, O'Neil J (2006) The interaction of ethnicity and chronic disease as risk factors for osteoporotic fractures: a comparison in Canadian aboriginals and non-aboriginals. Osteoporos Int 17:1358–1368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Melton LJ III, Leibson CL, Achenbach SJ, Therneau TM, Khosla S (2008) Fracture risk in type 2 diabetes: update of a population-based study. J Bone Miner Res 23:1334–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bonds DE, Larson JC, Schwartz AV, Strotmeyer ES, Robbins J, Rodriguez BL, Johnson KC, Margolis KL (2006) Risk of fracture in women with type 2 diabetes: the Women's Health Initiative observational study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:3404–3410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Schwartz AV, Vittinghoff E, Bauer DC, Hillier TA, Strotmeyer ES, Ensrud KE, Donaldson MG, Cauley JA, Harris TB, Koster A, Womack CR, Palermo L, Black DM (2011) Association of BMD and FRAX score with risk of fracture in older adults with type 2 diabetes. JAMA 305:2184–2192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. National diabetes fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2007. 2008

  36. Struthers R, Baker M, Savik K (2006) Cardiovascular risk factors among native American women inter-tribal heart project participants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 35:482–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Solomon TG, Gottlieb NH (1999) Measures of American Indian traditionality and its relationship to cervical cancer screening. Health Care Women Int 20:493–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Nelson DA, Beck TJ, Wu G, Lewis CE, Bassford T, Cauley JA, Leboff MS, Going SB, Chen Z (2011) Ethnic differences in femur geometry in the women's health initiative observational study. Osteoporos Int 22:1377–1388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the NIH/NCRR-funded (M01-RR14467) General Clinical Research Center, NIH/NCRR (P20 RR 024215)-funded Oklahoma Shared Clinical and Translational Resources at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, and the Oklahoma Agriculture Experiment Station (OKLO2690) at Oklahoma State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. J. Smith.

Ethics declarations

Statement of human rights

This study was approved by OUHSC IRB (#3040) in agreement with Oklahoma State University (IRB #HE0840) and IHS (IRB #P-07-03-OK). All procedures have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid described in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, B.J., Leyva, M.J., Stephens, L.D. et al. Relationship of American Indian blood quantum with osteoporosis risk: a cross-sectional study of American Indian women in Oklahoma. Osteoporos Int 29, 2251–2260 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4594-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4594-6

Keywords

Navigation