The comparability of HR-pQCT bone measurements is improved by scanning anatomically standardized regions
- 351 Downloads
We investigated the sensitivity of distal bone density, structure, and strength measurements by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to variability in limb length. Our results demonstrate that HR-pQCT should be performed at a standard %-of-total-limb-length to avoid substantial measurement bias in population study comparisons and the evaluation of individual skeletal status in a clinical context.
High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) measures of bone do not account for anatomic variability in bone length: a 1-cm volume is acquired at a fixed offset from an anatomic landmark. Our goal was to evaluate HR-pQCT measurement variability introduced by imaging fixed vs. proportional volumes and to propose a standard protocol for relative anatomic positioning.
Double-length (2-cm) scans were acquired in 30 adults. We compared measurements from 1-cm sub-volumes located at the default fixed offset, and the average %-of-length offset. The average position corresponded to 4.0% ± 1.1 mm for radius, and 7.2% ± 2.2 mm for tibia. We calculated the RMS difference in bone parameters and T-scores to determine the measurement variability related to differences in limb length. We used anthropometric ratios to estimate the mean limb length for published HR-pQCT reference data, and then calculated mean %-of-length offsets.
Variability between fixed vs. relative scan positions was highest in the radius, and for cortical bone in general (RMS difference Ct.Th = 19.5%), while individuals had T-score differentials as high as +3.0 SD (radius Ct.BMD). We estimated that average scan position for published HR-pQCT reference data corresponded to 4.0% at the radius, and 7.3% at tibia.
Variability in limb length introduces significant bias to HR-pQCT measures, confounding cross-sectional analyses and limiting the clinical application for individual assessment of skeletal status. We propose to standardize scan positioning using 4.0 and 7.3% of total bone length for the distal radius and tibia, respectively.
KeywordsBone HR-pQCT Multicenter study Osteoporosis Precision Standardization
The authors would like to thank Isra Said, MD of UCSF, and Margaret Holets, Louise McCready, and James Peterson of Mayo Clinic for their assistance with clinical coordination and data collection. This study was supported by NIH/NIAMS R01 AR060700.
Compliance with ethical standards
All subjects provided written informed consent to participate in this study. The Committees on Human Research of UCSF and Mayo Clinic approved all study procedures.
Conflicts of interest
- 6.Mueller TL, van Lenthe GH, Stauber M, Gratzke C, Eckstein F, Müller R (2009) Regional, age and gender differences in architectural measures of bone quality and their correlation to bone mechanical competence in the human radius of an elderly population. Bone 45:882–891. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.06.031 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Burt LA, Liang Z, Sajobi TT, Hanley DA, Boyd SK (2016) Sex- and site-specific normative data curves for HR-pQCT. J Bone Miner Res xx:1–7. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2873
- 10.Zanchetta MB, Scioscia MF, Zanchetta JR (2016) Bone microarchitecture in Rett syndrome and treatment with teriparatide: a case report. Osteoporos Int:1–5. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3586-7
- 13.Engelke K, Adams JE, Armbrecht G, Augat P, Bogado CE, Bouxsein ML, Felsenberg D, Ito M, Prevrhal S, Hans DB, Lewiecki EM (2008) Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD official positions. J Clin Densitom 11:123–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Shanbhogue VV, Hansen S, Halekoh U, Brixen K (2015) Use of relative vs fixed offset distance to define region of interest at the distal radius and tibia in high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. J Clin Densitom 18:217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2014.12.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Burghardt AJ, Kazakia GJ, Ramachandran S, Link TM, Majumdar S (2010) Age- and gender-related differences in the geometric properties and biomechanical significance of intracortical porosity in the distal radius and tibia. J Bone Miner Res 25:983–993. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.091104 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Dalzell N, Kaptoge S, Morris N, Berthier A, Koller B, Braak L, Van Rietbergen B, Reeve J (2009) Bone micro-architecture and determinants of strength in the radius and tibia: age-related changes in a population-based study of normal adults measured with high-resolution pQCT. Osteoporos Int 20:1683–1694. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0833-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Hansen S, Shanbhogue V, Folkestad L, Nielsen MMF, Brixen K (2014) Bone microarchitecture and estimated strength in 499 adult Danish women and men: a cross-sectional, population-based high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomographic study on peak bone structure. Calcif Tissue Int 94:269–281. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9808-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Hung VWY, Zhu TY, Cheung W-H, Fong T-N, Yu FWP, Hung L-K, Leung K-S, Cheng JCY, Lam T-P, Qin L (2015) Age-related differences in volumetric bone mineral density, microarchitecture, and bone strength of distal radius and tibia in Chinese women: a high-resolution pQCT reference database study. Osteoporos Int:1691–1703. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3045-x
- 31.Hildebrand T, Ru P (1997) A new method for the model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images 185:67–75.Google Scholar
- 32.Laib A, Hildebrand T, Häuselmann H, Rüegsegger P (1997) Ridge number density: a new parameter for in vivo bone structure analysis. Bone 21:541–546 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8756328297002056 (accessed January 15, 2015)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Mueller TL, Christen D, Sandercott S, Boyd SK, van Rietbergen B, Eckstein F, Lochmüller E-M, Müller R, van Lenthe GH (2011) Computational finite element bone mechanics accurately predicts mechanical competence in the human radius of an elderly population. Bone 48:1232–1238. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.02.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Bonaretti S, Vilayphiou N, Chan CM, Yu A, Nishiyama K, Liu D, Boutroy S, Ghasem-Zadeh A, Boyd SK, Chapurlat R, McKay H, Shane E, Bouxsein ML, Black DM, Majumdar S, Orwoll ES, Lang TF, Khosla S, Burghardt AJ (n.d.) Operator variability in scan positioning is a major component of HR-pQCT precision error and is reduced by standardized training, Osteoporos Int. 2017 Jan;28(1):245–257.Google Scholar
- 35.Cox HWV (1990) Medical jurisprudence and toxicology, 6th Edition, The law book company.Google Scholar
- 36.Knight B (1998) Lawyer’s guide to forensic medicine, Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar
- 38.Melton LJ, Riggs BL, van Lenthe GH, Achenbach SJ, Müller R, Bouxsein ML, Amin S, Atkinson EJ, Khosla S (2007) Contribution of in vivo structural measurements and load/strength ratios to the determination of forearm fracture risk in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 22:1442–1448. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.070514 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Duyar İ, Pelin C (2010) Estimating body height from ulna length: need of a population-specific formula. Eurasian J. Anthropol. 1:11–17 http://www.eurasianjournals.com/index.php/eja/article/view/327 Google Scholar
- 42.Sargin OO, Duyar I, Demircin S (2012) Estimation of stature from the lengths of ulna and tibia: a cadaveric study based on group-specific regression equations. Eurasian J Anthropol 3:1–9Google Scholar