Osteoporosis International

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 767–774 | Cite as

International Osteoporosis Foundation and European Calcified Tissue Society Working Group. Recommendations for the screening of adherence to oral bisphosphonates

  • A. Diez-Perez
  • K. E. Naylor
  • B. Abrahamsen
  • D. Agnusdei
  • M. L. Brandi
  • C. Cooper
  • E. Dennison
  • E. F. Eriksen
  • D. T. Gold
  • N. Guañabens
  • P. Hadji
  • M. Hiligsmann
  • R. Horne
  • R. Josse
  • J. A. Kanis
  • B. Obermayer-Pietsch
  • D. Prieto-Alhambra
  • J.-Y. Reginster
  • R. Rizzoli
  • S. Silverman
  • M. C. Zillikens
  • R. Eastell
  • Adherence Working Group of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the European Calcified Tissue Society
Position Paper

Abstract

Summary

Adherence to oral bisphosphonates is low. A screening strategy is proposed based on the response of biochemical markers of bone turnover after 3 months of therapy. If no change is observed, the clinician should reassess the adherence to the treatment and also other potential issues with the drug.

Introduction

Low adherence to oral bisphosphonates is a common problem that jeopardizes the efficacy of treatment of osteoporosis. No clear screening strategy for the assessment of compliance is widely accepted in these patients.

Methods

The International Osteoporosis Foundation and the European Calcified Tissue Society have convened a working group to propose a screening strategy to detect a lack of adherence to these drugs. The question to answer was whether the bone turnover markers (BTMs) PINP and CTX can be used to identify low adherence in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis initiating oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. The findings of the TRIO study specifically address this question and were used as the basis for testing the hypothesis.

Results

Based on the findings of the TRIO study, specifically addressing this question, the working group recommends measuring PINP and CTX at baseline and 3 months after starting therapy to check for a decrease above the least significant change (decrease of more than 38% for PINP and 56% for CTX). Detection rate for the measurement of PINP is 84%, for CTX 87% and, if variation in at least one is considered when measuring both, the level of detection is 94.5%.

Conclusions

If a significant decrease is observed, the treatment can continue, but if no decrease occurs, the clinician should reassess to identify problems with the treatment, mainly low adherence.

Keywords

Adherence Bisphosphonates Osteoporosis treatment Position paper Screening 

References

  1. 1.
    Cramer JA, Gold DT, Silverman SL, Lewiecki EM (2007) A systematic review of persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 18(8):1023–1031CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kothawala P, Badamgarav E, Ryu S, Miller RM, Halbert RJ (2007) Systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world adherence to drug therapy for osteoporosis. Mayo Clin Proc 82(12):1493–1501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kanis JA, Reginster JY, Kaufman JM, Ringe JD, Adachi JD, Hiligsmann M et al (2012) A reappraisal of generic bisphosphonates in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 23(1):213–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hiligsmann M, Rabenda V, Gathon HJ, Ethgen O, Reginster JY (2010) Potential clinical and economic impact of nonadherence with osteoporosis medications. Calcif Tissue Int 86(3):202–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hiligsmann M, Salas M, Hughes DA, Manias E, Gwadry-Sridhar FH, Linck P et al (2013) Interventions to improve osteoporosis medication adherence and persistence: a systematic review and literature appraisal by the ISPOR Medication Adherence & Persistence Special Interest Group. Osteoporos Int 24(12):2907–2918CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kanis JA, Cooper C, Hiligsmann M, Rabenda V, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R (2011) Partial adherence: a new perspective on health economic assessment in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 22(10):2565–2573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY et al (2013) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 24(1):23–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vasikaran S, Eastell R, Bruyere O, Foldes AJ, Garnero P, Griesmacher A et al (2011) Markers of bone turnover for the prediction of fracture risk and monitoring of osteoporosis treatment: a need for international reference standards. Osteoporos Int 22(2):391–420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Diez-Perez A, Adachi JD, Agnusdei D, Bilezikian JP, Compston JE, Cummings SR et al (2012) Treatment failure in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 23(12):2769–2774CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Delmas PD, Vrijens B, Eastell R, Roux C, Pols HA, Ringe JD et al (2007) Effect of monitoring bone turnover markers on persistence with risedronate treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92(4):1296–1304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Naylor KE, Jacques RM, Paggiosi M, Gossiel F, Peel NF, McCloskey EV et al (2016) Response of bone turnover markers to three oral bisphosphonate therapies in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the TRIO study. Osteoporos Int 27(1):21–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carbonell-Abella C, Pages-Castella A, Javaid MK, Nogues X, Farmer AJ, Cooper C et al (2015) Early (1-year) discontinuation of different anti-osteoporosis medications compared: a population-based cohort study. Calcif Tissue Int 97(6):535–541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paggiosi MA, Peel N, McCloskey E, Walsh JS, Eastell R (2014) Comparison of the effects of three oral bisphosphonate therapies on the peripheral skeleton in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the TRIO study. Osteoporos Int 25(12):2729–2741CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wald NJ (2008) Guidance on terminology. J Med Screen 15(1):50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chavassieux P, Portero-Muzy N, Roux JP, Garnero P, Chapurlat R (2015) Are biochemical markers of bone turnover representative of bone histomorphometry in 370 postmenopausal women? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100(12):4662–4668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mayranpaa MK, Tamminen IS, Kroger H, Makitie O (2011) Bone biopsy findings and correlation with clinical, radiological, and biochemical parameters in children with fractures. J Bone Miner Res 26(8):1748–1758CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reid IR, Miller PD, Brown JP, Kendler DL, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Valter I et al (2010) Effects of denosumab on bone histomorphometry: the FREEDOM and STAND studies. J Bone Miner Res 25(10):2256–2265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dobnig H, Sipos A, Jiang Y, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Ste-Marie LG, Gallagher JC et al (2005) Early changes in biochemical markers of bone formation correlate with improvements in bone structure during teriparatide therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90(7):3970–3977CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sebba AI, Bonnick SL, Kagan R, Thompson DE, Skalky CS, Chen E et al (2004) Response to therapy with once-weekly alendronate 70 mg compared to once-weekly risedronate 35 mg in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Curr Med Res Opin 20(12):2031–2041CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Diez-Perez A, Olmos JM, Nogues X, Sosa M, Diaz-Curiel M, Perez-Castrillon JL et al (2012) Risk factors for prediction of inadequate response to antiresorptives. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 27(4):817–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fink E, Cormier C, Steinmetz P, Kindermans C, Le Bouc Y, Souberbielle JC (2000) Differences in the capacity of several biochemical bone markers to assess high bone turnover in early menopause and response to alendronate therapy. Osteoporos Int 11(4):295–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hannon R, Blumsohn A, Naylor K, Eastell R (1998) Response of biochemical markers of bone turnover to hormone replacement therapy: impact of biological variability. J Bone Miner Res 13(7):1124–1133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rogers A, Glover SJ, Eastell R (2009) A randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, trial to determine the individual response in bone turnover markers to lasofoxifene therapy. Bone 45(6):1044–1052CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Horne R, Chapman SC, Parham R, Freemantle N, Forbes A, Cooper V (2013) Understanding patients’ adherence-related beliefs about medicines prescribed for long-term conditions: a meta-analytic review of the Necessity-Concerns Framework. PLoS One 8(12):e80633CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eastell R, Vrijens B, Cahall DL, Ringe JD, Garnero P, Watts NB (2011) Bone turnover markers and bone mineral density response with risedronate therapy: relationship with fracture risk and patient adherence. J Bone Miner Res 26(7):1662–1669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Garnero P, Borel O, Delmas PD (2001) Evaluation of a fully automated serum assay for C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen in osteoporosis. Clin Chem 47(4):694–702PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Garnero P, Vergnaud P, Hoyle N (2008) Evaluation of a fully automated serum assay for total N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Clin Chem 54(1):188–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Diez-Perez
    • 1
  • K. E. Naylor
    • 2
  • B. Abrahamsen
    • 3
    • 4
  • D. Agnusdei
    • 5
  • M. L. Brandi
    • 6
  • C. Cooper
    • 7
    • 8
  • E. Dennison
    • 7
  • E. F. Eriksen
    • 9
  • D. T. Gold
    • 10
  • N. Guañabens
    • 11
  • P. Hadji
    • 12
  • M. Hiligsmann
    • 13
  • R. Horne
    • 14
  • R. Josse
    • 15
  • J. A. Kanis
    • 16
  • B. Obermayer-Pietsch
    • 17
  • D. Prieto-Alhambra
    • 18
  • J.-Y. Reginster
    • 19
  • R. Rizzoli
    • 20
  • S. Silverman
    • 21
  • M. C. Zillikens
    • 22
  • R. Eastell
    • 2
  • Adherence Working Group of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the European Calcified Tissue Society
  1. 1.Department of Internal MedicineHospital del Mar-IMIM-Universitat Autònoma and CIBERFES-ISCIIIBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, Mellanby Centre for Bone ResearchUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  3. 3.Institute of Clinical Research, Odense Patient Data Explorative NetworkUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
  4. 4.Department of MedicineHolbæk HospitalHolbækDenmark
  5. 5.Independent Scientific ConsultantFlorenceItaly
  6. 6.Mineral and Bone Metabolic Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational MedicineUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  7. 7.MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General HospitalUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  8. 8.NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Institute of Musculoskeletal SciencesUniversity of Oxford, and CIBERFES-ISCIIIOxfordUK
  9. 9.Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive MedicineOslo University Hospital and University of OsloOsloNorway
  10. 10.Duke University Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  11. 11.Rheumatology Department, Hospital ClínicUniversity of Barcelona, CIBERehdBarcelonaSpain
  12. 12.Department of Bone Oncology, Endocrinology and Reproductive MedicineNordwest HospitalFrankfurtGermany
  13. 13.Department of Health Services Research, School for Public Health & Primary Care (CAPHRI)Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  14. 14.Centre for Behavioural Medicine, UCL School of PharmacyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  15. 15.Department of Nutritional Sciences and Department of Medicine, St. Michael’s HospitalUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  16. 16.Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal AgeingUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  17. 17.Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal MedicineMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
  18. 18.Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  19. 19.Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health EconomicsUniversity of LiègeLiègeBelgium
  20. 20.Service of Bone Diseases, Faculty of MedicineGeneva University HospitalsGenevaSwitzerland
  21. 21.Cedars-Sinai/University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  22. 22.Department of Internal MedicineErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations