Skip to main content
Log in

The current economic burden of illness of osteoporosis in Canada

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

We estimate the current burden of illness of osteoporosis in Canada is double ($4.6 billion) our previous estimates ($2.3 billion) due to improved data capture of the multiple encounters and services that accompany a fracture: emergency room, admissions to acute and step-down non-acute institutions, rehabilitation, home-assisted or long-term residency support.

Introduction

We previously estimated the economic burden of illness of osteoporosis-attributable fractures in Canada for the year 2008 to be $2.3 billion in the base case and as much as $3.9 billion. The aim of this study is to update the estimate of the economic burden of illness for osteoporosis-attributable fractures for Canada based on newly available home care and long-term care (LTC) data.

Methods

Multiple national databases were used for the fiscal-year ending March 31, 2011 (FY 2010/2011) for acute institutional care, emergency visits, day surgery, secondary admissions for rehabilitation, and complex continuing care, as well as national dispensing data for osteoporosis medications. Gaps in national data were supplemented by provincial and community survey data. Osteoporosis-attributable fractures for Canadians age 50+ were identified by ICD-10-CA codes. Costs were expressed in 2014 dollars.

Results

In FY 2010/2011, the number of osteoporosis-attributable fractures was 131,443 resulting in 64,884 acute care admissions and 983,074 acute hospital days. Acute care costs were $1.5 billion, an 18 % increase since 2008. The cost of LTC was 33.4 times the previous estimate ($31 million versus $1.03 billion) because of improved data capture. The cost for rehabilitation and secondary admissions increased 3.4 fold, while drug costs decreased 19 %. The overall cost of osteoporosis was over $4.6 billion, an increase of 83 % from the 2008 estimate.

Conclusion

Since the 2008 estimate, new Canadian data on home care and LTC are available which provided a better estimate of the burden of osteoporosis in Canada. This suggests that our previous estimates were seriously underestimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tarride JE, Hopkins RB, Leslie WD, Morin S, Adachi JD, Papaioannou A, Bessette L, Brown JP, Goeree R (2012) The burden of illness of osteoporosis in Canada. Osteoporos Int 23:2591–2600

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Canadian Institute for Health Information (2011) Health indicators 2011. CIHI, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  3. Poss JW, Hirdes JP, Fries BE, McKillop I, Chase M (2008) Validation of Resource Utilization Groups version III for Home Care (RUG-III/HC): evidence from a Canadian home care jurisdiction. Med Care 46:380–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Canadian Institute for Health Information (2015) Discharge Abstract Database (DAD). CIHI. https://www.cihi.ca/en/types-of-care/hospital-care/acute-care/dad-metadata Accessed 17 November 2015

  5. Canadian Institute for Health Information (2015) National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS). CIHI. https://www.cihi.ca/en/types-of-care/hospital-care/emergency-and-ambulatory-care/nacrs-metadata Accessed 17 November 2015

  6. Canadian Institute for Health Information (2015) National Rehabilitation Reporting System (NRS). CIHI. https://www.cihi.ca/en/types-of-care/hospital-care/rehabilitation/national-rehabilitation-reporting-system-nrs-metadata Accessed 17 November 2015

  7. Canadian Institute for Health Information (2015) Home Care Reporting System (HCRS). CIHI. https://www.cihi.ca/en/types-of-care/community-care/home-care/hcrs-metadata

  8. Canadian Institute for Health Information (2015) Continuing Care Reporting System (CCRS). CIHI. https://www.cihi.ca/en/types-of-care/hospital-care/continuing-care/continuing-care-reporting-system-ccrs-metadata Accessed 17 November 2015

  9. Hopkins RB, Tarride JE, Leslie WD et al (2013) Estimating the excess costs for patients with incident fractures, prevalent fractures, and nonfracture osteoporosis. OsteoporosInt 24:581–593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. IMS Brogran (2014) IMS PharmaStat. IMS Health Inc

  11. Kaffashian S, Raina P, Oremus M, Pickard L, Adachi J, Papadimitropoulos E, Papaioannou A (2011) The burden of osteoporotic fractures beyond acute care: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Age Ageing 40:602–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Statistics Canada (2014) Labour force survey estimates (LFS), by sex and detailed age group, annual. CANSIM database. http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&retrLang=eng&id=2820002&&pattern=&stByVal=1&p1=1&p2=37&tabMode=dataTable&csid= Accessed 17 November 2015

  13. Mackey DC, Lui LY, Cawthon PM, Bauer DC, Nevitt MC, Cauley JA, Hillier TA, Lewis CE, Barrett-Connor E, Cummings SR (2007) High-trauma fractures and low bone mineral density in older women and men. JAMA 298:2381–2388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care (2014) Schedule of Benefits for Physician Services Under the Health Insurance Act (May 1, 2014). http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/ohip/sob/physserv/physserv_mn.html Accessed 17 November 2015

  15. The College of Family Physicians of Canada (2014 Nov) Annual physical examination practices by province/territory in Canada. http://www.cfpc.ca/CFPC-PT-Annual-Exam/

  16. Bessette L, Ste-Marie LG, Jean S, Davison KS, Beaulieu M, Baranci M, Bessant J, Brown JP (2008) Recognizing osteoporosis and its consequences in Quebec (ROCQ): background, rationale, and methods of an anti-fracture patient health-management programme. Contemp Clin Trials 29:194–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nikitovic M, Wodchis WP, Krahn MD, Cadarette SM (2013) Direct health-care costs attributed to hip fractures among seniors: a matched cohort study. Osteoporos Int 24:659–669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Svedbom A, Hernlund E, Ivergard M (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: a compendium of country-specific reports. Arch Osteoporos 8:137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Akobundu E, Ju J, Blatt L, Mullins CD (2006) Cost-of-illness studies: a review of current methods. Pharmacoeconomics 24:869–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (2015) University of Manitoba. http://umanitoba.ca/faculties/medicine/units/community_health_sciences/departmental_units/mchp/resources/repository/index.html

  21. Kreiger N, Joseph L, Mackenzie T, Poliquin S, Brown JP, Prior JC, Rittmaster RS, Tenenhouse A (1999) The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos): background, rationale, methods. Can J Aging 18:376–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bessette L, Jean S, Lapointe-Garant MP, Belzile EL, Davison KS, Ste-Marie LG, Brown JP (2011) Direct medical costs attributable to peripheral fractures in Canadian post-menopausal women. Osteoporos Int 23:1757–1768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Medical Advisory S (2008) The Falls/Fractures Economic Model in Ontario Residents Aged 65 Years and Over (FEMOR).

  24. Lentle BC, Brown JP, Khan A, Leslie WD, Levesque J, Lyons DJ, Siminoski K, Tarulli G, Josse RG, Hodsman A (2007) Recognizing and reporting vertebral fractures: reducing the risk of future osteoporotic fractures. Can Assoc Radiol J 58:27–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ontario Long Term Care Association (2014) This is long term care 2014. Ontario Long Term Care Association. http://www.oltca.com/oltca/OLTCA/Public/ReportsPublications/AssociationPublications.aspx Accessed 17 November 2015

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by a grant from Amgen Canada. National administrative data were provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. B. Hopkins.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interests

Dr. Tarride has received grant/research support from Amgen Canada.

Dr. Morin has received grant/research support from Amgen and Merck and consultant fees from Amgen.

Dr. Adachi has received grant/research support from Amgen, Eli Lilly, and Merck; speaker’s bureau/honoraria from Actavis, Amgen, Eli Lilly, and Merck; and has been a consultant for AgNovos, Amgen, Eli Lilly, and Merck.

Dr. Papaioannou has received grant/research support and consulting fees from Amgen, consulting fees from Eli Lilly, is a member of an Advisory Board for Amgen, Eli Lilly, and Merck, and is a member of a speaker’s bureau for Amgen and Eli Lilly.

Dr. Bessette has received grant/research support from Amgen.

Dr. Brown has received grant/research support, consulting fees, and speakers’ bureau fees from Amgen and Eli Lilly, and grant/research support from Novartis.

Dr. Pericleous is employed by Amgen Canada, which funded this study.

Dr. Leslie has received grant/research support and speaker fees from Amgen.

Dr. Hopkins, Ms. Burke, and Ms. von Keyserlingk declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human and animal rights

Ethics approval and consent from patients was not necessary for use of these de-identified secondary data sets provided by CIHI.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM. 1

(DOCX 18 kb)

ESM. 2

(DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hopkins, R.B., Burke, N., Von Keyserlingk, C. et al. The current economic burden of illness of osteoporosis in Canada. Osteoporos Int 27, 3023–3032 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3631-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3631-6

Keywords

Navigation