Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Response to Giangregorio et al.: “Intensity is a subjective construct”

  • Letter
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Watson SL, Weeks BK, Weis LJ, Horan SA, Beck BR (2015) Heavy resistance training is safe and improves bone, function, and stature in postmenopausal women with low to very low bone mass: novel early findings from the LIFTMOR trial. Osteoporos Int 26(12):2889–94. doi:10.1007/s00198-015-3263-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Giangregorio LM, Papaioannou A, Heinonen A, Cheung AM, Laprade J, Ashe MC, MacIntyre NJ, Shipp K, McGill S, Ravi J, Keller H, Wark JD (2016) Intensity is a subjective construct. Osteoporos Int. doi:10.1007/s00198-016-3507-9

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Giangregorio LM, Papaioannou A, Macintyre NJ, Ashe MC, Heinonen A, Shipp K, Wark J, McGill S, Keller H, Jain R, Laprade J, Cheung AM (2014) Too Fit to Fracture: exercise recommendations for individuals with osteoporosis or osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 25(3):821–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ratamess NA (2013) Resistance training program variables and guidelines, in Resistance Training for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Disease. J.T. Ciccolo and W.J. Kraemer, Editors. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p. 9. eBook. ISBN: 978-1-4665-0106-5

  5. American College of Sports Medicine (2009) American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41(3):687–708

  6. Magyari P (2010) Resistance training intensity: Research and Rationale. ACSM Certified News 20(2):3–4

    Google Scholar 

  7. Williams MA, Haskell WL, Ades PA, Amsterdam EA, Bittner V, Franklin BA, Gulanick M, Laing ST, Stewart KJ (2007) American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism, Resistance exercise in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation, 116(5): p. 572–84

  8. Chilibeck PD, Vatanparast H, Pierson R, Case A, Olatunbosun O, Whiting SJ, Beck TJ, Pahwa P, Biem HJ (2013) Effect of exercise training combined with isoflavone supplementation on bone and lipids in postmenopausal women: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Miner Res 28(4):780–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kerr D, Ackland T, Maslen B, Morton A, Prince R (2001) Resistance training over 2 years increases bone mass in calcium-replete postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 16(1):175–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rhodes EC, Martin AD, Taunton JE, Donnelly M, Warren J, Elliot J (2000) Effects of one year of resistance training on the relation between muscular strength and bone density in elderly women. Br J Sports Med 34(1):18–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. R. Beck.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beck, B.R., Watson, S.L., Weis, L. et al. Response to Giangregorio et al.: “Intensity is a subjective construct”. Osteoporos Int 27, 2393–2394 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3554-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3554-2

Keywords

Navigation