Advertisement

Osteoporosis International

, Volume 27, Issue 7, pp 2207–2215 | Cite as

Second fractures among older adults in the year following hip, shoulder, or wrist fracture

  • J. P. W. BynumEmail author
  • J.-E. Bell
  • R. V. Cantu
  • Q. Wang
  • C. M. McDonough
  • D. Carmichael
  • T. D. Tosteson
  • A. N. A. Tosteson
Original Article

Abstract

Summary

We report on second fracture occurrence in the year following a hip, shoulder or wrist fracture using insurance claims. Among 273,330 people, 4.3 % had a second fracture; risk did not differ by first fracture type. Estimated adjusted second fracture probabilities may facilitate population-based evaluation of secondary fracture prevention strategies.

Introduction

The purpose of this study was estimate second fracture risk for the older US population in the year following a hip, shoulder, or wrist fracture.

Methods

Observational cohort study of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with an index hip, shoulder, or wrist fragility fracture in 2009. Time-to-event analyses using Cox proportional hazards models to characterize the relationship between index fracture type (hip, shoulder, wrist) and patient factors (age, gender, and comorbidity) on second fracture risk in the year following the index fracture.

Results

Among 273,330 individuals with fracture, 11,885 (4.3 %) sustained a second hip, shoulder or wrist fracture within one year. Hip fracture was most common, regardless of the index fracture type. Comparing adjusted second fracture risks across index fracture types reveals that the magnitude of second fracture risk within each age-comorbidity group is similar regardless of the index fracture. Men and women face similar risks with frequently overlapping confidence intervals, except among women aged 85 years or older who are at greater risk.

Conclusions

Regardless of index fracture type, second fractures are common in the year following hip, shoulder or wrist fracture. Secondary fracture prevention strategies that take a population perspective should be informed by these estimates which take competing mortality risks into account.

Keywords

Hip fracture Osteoporosis Risk Shoulder fracture Wrist fracture 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (#P60 AR062799).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Supplementary material

198_2016_3542_MOESM1_ESM.docx (124 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 120 kb)
198_2016_3542_Fig4_ESM.gif (92 kb)
Supplementary Figure 1

(GIF 52 kb)

198_2016_3542_MOESM2_ESM.tif (621 kb)
High resolution image (TIF 620 kb)
198_2016_3542_MOESM3_ESM.docx (58 kb)
Online Supplementary Table 1 (DOCX 31 kb)
198_2016_3542_MOESM4_ESM.docx (39 kb)
Online Supplementary Table 3 (DOCX 39 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Dennison E, Cole Z, Cooper C (2005) Diagnosis and epidemiology of osteoporosis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 17(4):456–461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kanis JA (2002) Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 359(9321):1929–1936CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35(2):375–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB et al (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res 15(4):721–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robinson CM, Royds M, Abraham A et al (2002) Refractures in patients at least forty-five years old. a prospective analysis of twenty-two thousand and sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 84-A(9):1528–1533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM et al (1992) Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985–1989. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res 7(2):221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Radley DC, Gottlieb DJ, Fisher ES et al (2008) Comorbidity risk-adjustment strategies are comparable among persons with hip fracture. J Clin Epidemiol 61(6):580–587CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG (1993) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol 46(10):1075–1079, discussion 81-90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eisman JA, Bogoch ER, Dell R et al (2012) Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASBMR task force report on secondary fracture prevention. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res 27(10):2039–2046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    American Orthopaedic Association. Own the Bone. Secondary Own the Bone. http://www.ownthebone.org/about-own-the-bone.aspx
  11. 11.
    National Committee for Quality Assurance. Osteoporosis testing and management in older women. Secondary osteoporosis testing and management in older women 2014. http://www.ncqa.org/ReportCards/HealthPlans/StateofHealthCareQuality/2014TableofContents/Osteoporosis.aspx
  12. 12.
    Lee YK, Ha YC, Yoon BH et al (2013) Incidence of second hip fracture and compliant use of bisphosphonate. Osteoporos Int: J Established Result Cooperation Between Eur Foundation Osteoporos Nat Osteoporos Foundation USA 24(7):2099–2104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Melton LJ 3rd, Kearns AE, Atkinson EJ et al (2009) Secular trends in hip fracture incidence and recurrence. Osteoporos Int: J Established Result Cooperation Between Eur Foundation Osteoporos Nat Osteoporos Foundation USA 20(5):687–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Melton LJ 3rd, Crowson CS, O'Fallon WM (1999) Fracture incidence in Olmsted County, Minnesota: comparison of urban with rural rates and changes in urban rates over time. Osteoporos Int: J Established Result Cooperation Between Eur Foundation Osteoporos Nat Osteoporos Foundation USA 9(1):29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schousboe JT, Taylor BC, Fink HA et al (2007) Cost-effectiveness of bone densitometry followed by treatment of osteoporosis in older men. JAMA: J Am Med Assoc 298(6):629–637. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.6.629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gaines JM, Marx KA, Caudill J et al (2010) Older men’s knowledge of osteoporosis and the prevalence of risk factors. J Clin Densitometry: Off J Int Soc Clin Densitometry 13(2):204–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kiebzak GM, Beinart GA, Perser K et al (2002) Undertreatment of osteoporosis in men with hip fracture. Arch Intern Med 162(19):2217–2222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. W. Bynum
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • J.-E. Bell
    • 3
  • R. V. Cantu
    • 3
  • Q. Wang
    • 1
  • C. M. McDonough
    • 1
    • 4
  • D. Carmichael
    • 1
  • T. D. Tosteson
    • 2
    • 3
  • A. N. A. Tosteson
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical PracticeGeisel School of Medicine at DartmouthLebanonUSA
  2. 2.Department of MedicineDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterLebanonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterLebanonUSA
  4. 4.The Health and Disability Research Institute, Department of Health Policy and ManagementBoston University School of Public HealthBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations