The interactions between municipal socioeconomic status and age on hip fracture risk
- 410 Downloads
Age modifies the effect of area-level socioeconomic status (SES) in the risk of fragility hip fractures (HF). For older individuals, the risk of HF increases as SES increases. For younger individuals, risk of HF increases as SES decreases. Our study may help decision-makers to better direct the implementation of political decisions.
The effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on hip fracture (HF) incidence remains unclear. The objective of this study is to evaluate the association between HF incidence and municipality-level SES as well as interactions between age and SES.
From the Portuguese Hospital Discharge Database, we selected hospitalizations (2000–2010) of patients aged 50+, with HF diagnosis (codes 820.x, ICD9-CM), caused by traumas of low/moderate energy, excluding bone cancer cases and readmissions for aftercare. Municipalities were classified according to SES (deprived to affluent) using 2001 Census data. A spatial Bayesian hierarchical regression model (controlling for data heterogeneity and spatial autocorrelation), using the Poisson distribution, was used to quantify the relative risk (RR) of HF, 95 % credible interval (95%CrI), and analyze the interaction between age and SES after adjusting for rural conditions.
There were 96,905 HF, 77.3 % of which were on women who, on average, were older than men (mean age 81.2 ± 8.5 vs 78.2 ± 10.1 years) at admission (p < 0.001). In women, there was a lower risk associated with better SES: RR = 0.83 (95%CrI 0.65–1.00) for affluent versus deprived. There was an inverse association between SES and HF incidence rate in the youngest and a direct association in the oldest, for both sexes, but significant only between deprived and affluent in older ages (≥75 years).
Interaction between SES and age may be due to inequalities in lifestyles, access to health systems, and preventive actions. These results may help decision-makers to better understand the epidemiology of hip fractures and to better direct the available funding.
KeywordHip fractures Interaction Osteoporosis Socioeconomic status Spatial epidemiology
This work was supported by FEDER funds through the Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade (COMPETE) and by Portuguese funds through Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) within the framework of the project PTDC/SAU-EPI/113424/2009 grant. We also acknowledge the Central Administration of Health Services (ACSS) for the data from the National Hospital Discharge Register.
Conflicts of interest
The funder Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia—FCT has no role in this paper.
- 1.Morrison A, Fan T, Sen SS, Weisenfluh L (2013) Epidemiology of falls and osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review. Clin Econ Outcomes Res: CEOR 5:9–18, Epub 2013/01/10Google Scholar
- 2.NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention (2001) Diagnosis, and Therapy, March 7–29, 2000: highlights of the conference. South Med J 94(6):569–73, Epub 2001/07/07Google Scholar
- 3.Ivergård M, Svedbom A, Hernlund E, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J et al (2013) Epidemiology and economic burden of osteoporosis in Portugal. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 8:137(1–2):167Google Scholar
- 19.INE Instituto Nacional de Estatística (2012). www.ine.pt. Accessed 13 Feb 2013
- 20.OECD (2011) Divided we stand: why inequality keeps rising. An overview of growing income inequalities in OECD countries: main findings. http://www.oecd.org/social/inequality.htm. Accessed 15 Apr 2013
- 22.ACSS (2011) Auditoria da codificação clínica [Clinical codification Audits]. http://portalcodgdh.min-saude.pt/index.php/Auditoria_da_codificação_cl%C3%ADnica. Accessed 12 June 2013
- 23.Moreira J. (2008) Fracturas Osteoporóticas do Colo do Fémur em Portugal e seus Determinantes Socioeconómicos. Porto: Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do PortoGoogle Scholar
- 24.Chevalley T, Herrmann FR, Delmi M, Stern R, Hoffmeyer P, Rapin CH et al (2002) Evaluation of the age-adjusted incidence of hip fractures between urban and rural areas: the difference is not related to the prevalence of institutions for the elderly. Osteoporos Int: J Established Result Cooperation Between Eur Foundation Osteoporos National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 13(2):113–8, Epub 2002/03/22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Banerjee S, Carlin BP, Gelfand AE. (2004) Hierarchical modeling and analysis for spatial data. In: Hall/CRC Ca, editorGoogle Scholar
- 26.R Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
- 27.Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N, Lunn D. WinBUGS User Manual (Version 1.4). 2003 January 2003. Report No.Google Scholar
- 36.Alves SM, Economou T, Oliveira C, Ribeiro AI, Neves N, Gomez-Barrena E, et al. (2012) Osteoporotic hip fractures: Bisphosphonates sales and observed turning point in trend. A population-based retrospective study. Bone. Epub 2013/01/01Google Scholar