A school-based resistance intervention improves skeletal growth in adolescent females
- 564 Downloads
Twenty-two sixth-grade girls who participated in a 7-month school-based resistance-training program were compared to 22 controls. In a subanalysis of Tanner breast II (T2) and III (T3) subjects (n = 21 controls subjects (CON), n = 17 subjects in the high-intervention (INT)-dose group (HI)), T2 HI had greater narrow neck (NN) width gains than T2 CON (p < 0.05) and T3 HI had greater L3 bone mineral density (BMD) gains than T3 CON (p < 0.05).
Physical activity modulates bone growth during adolescence, but an effective activity has not been identified for general use. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a school-based resistance-training program on skeletal growth in pre-menarcheal females.
Sixth-grade girls participated in a 7-month, resistance-training program (INT) embedded in physical education (PE) classes. Age- and maturity-matched CON from a neighboring school participated in the standard PE classes. INT dose defined high (HI) and low (LO) groups. At baseline (BL) and follow-up (FU), non-INT organized physical activity (PA, hours per week) and maturity status were recorded; DXA scans assessed total body, distal radius, proximal femur, and lumbar spine. Regression models analyzed growth in bone outcomes for HI versus CON, accounting for age, Tanner stage, height, and PA.
Forty-four girls (22 HI, 22 CON) were 11.7 ± 0.3 years of age at BL; all were ≤6 months postmenarche and did not differ in bone growth over the course of the intervention (p > 0.05). However, in a subanalysis limited to subjects who were T2 or T3 at BL (n = 21 CON, n = 17 HI), T2 HI had greater gains in NN width (p = 0.01) compared to T2 CON, while T3 HI had greater gains in L3 BMD (p = 0.03) compared to T3 CON.
In a group of T2 and T3 sixth-grade girls, a school-based resistance-training intervention produced maturity-specific differential gains for HI versus CON at the hip and spine.
KeywordsAdolescents Bone growth Exercise intervention Resistance training
This research was supported by the UW Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, funded through a Clinical and Translational Science Award, 9U54TR000021 from NIH/NCATS.
Conflicts of interest
- 4.Ferrari SL, Deutsch S, Choudhury U, Chevalley T, Bonjour JP, Dermitzakis ET, Rizzoli R, Antonarakis SE (2004) Polymorphisms in the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) gene are associated with variation in vertebral bone mass, vertebral bone size, and stature in whites. Am J Hum Genet 74:866–75PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Macdonald HM, Kontulainen SA, Petit MA, Beck TJ, Khan KM, McKay HA (2008) Does a novel school-based physical activity model benefit femoral neck bone strength in pre- and early pubertal children?. Osteoporos Int 19:1445–1456Google Scholar
- 24.Borenstein M, Rothstein H, Cohen J (2001) Sample Power V2.0. SPSS, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 25.Length RV (2009) Java applets for power and sample size, calculated on 16 Apr 2009Google Scholar
- 31.McKay HA, Petit MA, Schutz RW, Prior JC, Barr SI, Khan KM (2000) Augmented trochanteric bone mineral density after modified physical education classes: a randomized school-based exercise intervention study in prepubescent and early pubescent children. J Pediatr 136:156–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Ausili E, Rigante D, Salvaggio E, Focarelli B, Rendeli C, Ansuini V, Paolucci V, Triarico S, Martini L, Caradonna P (2012) Determinants of bone mineral density, bone mineral content, and body composition in a cohort of healthy children: influence of sex, age, puberty, and physical activity. Rheumatol Int 32:2737–2743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar