Advertisement

Osteoporosis International

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 195–204 | Cite as

Indirect costs account for half of the total costs of an osteoporotic fracture: a prospective evaluation

  • D. A. EekmanEmail author
  • M. M. ter Wee
  • V. M. H. Coupé
  • S. Erisek-Demirtas
  • M. H. Kramer
  • W. F. Lems
Original Article

Abstract

Summary

Data on direct and indirect costs of clinical fractures in 116 osteoporotic patients 50 years and older were prospectively collected using cost diaries. Indirect costs accounted for roughly half of the total costs, with a contribution of at least 81 % of these costs in employed patients.

Introduction

The aim of this prospective study was to gain insight into the current total costs of clinical fractures in osteoporotic patients aged 50 years and older.

Methods

In a study in the Netherlands, patients prospectively filled out cost diaries every 3 months, during 1 year after a clinical fracture. Primary analyses were performed on those patients with all four cost diaries returned. In-depth analyses of indirect costs were performed, dividing results for employed and unemployed patients. Sensitivity analyses using imputation techniques were performed on patients who returned two or three diaries

Results

Of the 116 included patients, 69 completed all four diaries, 24 only two or three, and 23 patient completed one or no diaries. For all fractures, approximately 50 % of the total costs were due to indirect costs; employed patients contributed for at least 81 % of the indirect cost. Humerus fractures were most expensive with a total 1-year cost of €16.841 per patient. Indirect costs in the group with clinical spine fractures were highest (€12.522), accounting for 89.1 % of the total costs for this fracture.

Conclusion

Indirect costs account for roughly half of the total costs of clinical fractures, which are largely related to sick leave. When performing cost analyses in fracture patients, we advise a societal perspective in which indirect costs are also considered, and to apply a patient derived prospective data collection method to get a ‘true’ and complete image of the total costs due to clinical fractures.

Keywords

Clinical and osteoporotic fractures Cost diary Fracture liaison service Indirect costs 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Sambrook P, Cooper C (2006) Osteoporos Lancet 367:2010–2018Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nederlandse Vereniging voor Reumatologie. (2011) CBO richtlijn osteoporose en fractuurpreventieGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Laet CE, van Hout BA, Hofman A, Pols HA (1996) Costs due to osteoporosis-induced fractures in the Netherlands; possibilities for cost control. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 140:1684–1688PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lippuner K, Golder M, Greiner R (2005) Epidemiology and direct medical costs of osteoporotic fractures in men and women in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S8–S17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roux C, Wyman A, Hooven FH, Gehlbach SH, Adachi JD, Chapurlat RD, Compston JE, Cooper C, Ez-Perez A, Greenspan SL, Lacroix AZ, Netelenbos JC, Pfeilschifter J, Rossini M, Saag KG, Sambrook PN, Silverman S, Siris ES, Watts NB, Boonen S (2012) Burden of non-hip, non-vertebral fractures on quality of life in postmenopausal women: the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW). Osteoporos Int 23:2863–2871PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tarride JE, Guo N, Hopkins R, Leslie WD, Morin S, Adachi JD, Papaioannou A, Bessette L, Brown JP, Goeree R (2012) The burden of illness of osteoporosis in Canadian men. J Bone Miner Res 27:1830–1838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tarride JE, Hopkins RB, Leslie WD, Morin S, Adachi JD, Papaioannou A, Bessette L, Brown JP, Goeree R (2012) The burden of illness of osteoporosis in Canada. Osteoporos Int 23:2591–2600PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McGowan B, Casey MC, Silke C, Whelan B, Bennett K (2012) Hospitalisations for fracture and associated costs between 2000 and 2009 in Ireland: a trend analysis. Osteoporos Int 24:849–857PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Piscitelli P, Gimigliano F, Gatto S, Marinelli A, Gimigliano A, Marinelli P, Chitano G, Greco M, Di PL, Sbenaglia E, Benvenuto M, Muratore M, Quarta E, Calcagnile F, Coli G, Borgia O, Forcina B, Fitto F, Giordano A, Distante A, Rossini M, Angeli A, Migliore A, Guglielmi G, Guida G, Brandi ML, Gimigliano R, Iolascon G (2010) Hip fractures in Italy: 2000–2005 extension study. Osteoporos Int 21:1323–1330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parthan A, Kruse M, Yurgin N, Huang J, Viswanathan HN, Taylor D. (2013) Cost Effectiveness of Denosumab versus Oral Bisphosphonates for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis in the US. Appl Health Econ Health PolicyGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goossens ME, Rutten-van Molken MP, Vlaeyen JW, van der Linden SM (2000) The cost diary: a method to measure direct and indirect costs in cost-effectiveness research. J Clin Epidemiol 53:688–695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pike CT, Birnbaum HG, Schiller M, Swallow E, Burge RT, Edgell ET (2011) Prevalence and costs of osteoporotic patients with subsequent non-vertebral fractures in the US. Osteoporos Int 22:2611–2621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dimai HP, Redlich K, Peretz M, Borgstrom F, Siebert U, Mahlich J (2012) Economic burden of osteoporotic fractures in Austria. Health Econ Rev 2:12PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rabenda V, Manette C, Lemmens R, Mariani AM, Struvay N, Reginster JY (2006) The direct and indirect costs of the chronic management of osteoporosis: a prospective follow-up of 3440 active subjects. Osteoporos Int 17:1346–1352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eisman JA, Bogoch ER, Dell R, Harrington JT, McKinney RE Jr, McLellan A, Mitchell PJ, Silverman S, Singleton R, Siris E (2012) Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASBMR task force report on secondary fracture prevention. J Bone Miner Res 27:2039–2046PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eekman D, van Helden S, Huisman A, Verhaar H, Bultink I, Geusens P, Lips P, Lems W. (2013) Optimizing fracture prevention: the fracture liaison service, an observational study. Osteoporos Int. doi: 10.1530/boneabs.1.PP43
  17. 17.
    Coupe VM, Veenhof C, van Tulder MW, Dekker J, Bijlsma JW, Van den Ende CH (2007) The cost effectiveness of behavioural graded activity in patients with osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee. Ann Rheum Dis 66:215–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oostenbrink JB, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF (2002) Standardisation of costs: the Dutch manual for costing in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics 20:443–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Medicijnkosten. Themasite van het College voor zorgverzekeringen (CVZ). (2012) Medication costs. Accessed on 26 June 2012Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF (1996) A practical guide for calculating indirect costs of disease. Pharmacoeconomics 10:460–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Busschbach JJ, Brouwer WB, van der Donk A, Passchier J, Rutten FF (1998) An outline for a cost-effectiveness analysis of a drug for patients with Alzheimer's disease. Pharmacoeconomics 13:21–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barber JA, Thompson SG (2000) Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the non-parametric bootstrap. Stat Med 19:3219–3236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thompson SG, Barber JA (2000) How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed? BMJ 320:1197–1200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gutierrez L, Roskell N, Castellsague J, Beard S, Rycroft C, Abeysinghe S, Shannon P, Gitlin M, Robbins S (2012) Clinical burden and incremental cost of fractures in postmenopausal women in the United Kingdom. Bone 51:324–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McLellan AR, Gallacher SJ, Fraser M, McQuillian C (2003) The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 14:1028–1034PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Strom O, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Lidgren L, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Abdon P, Ornstein E, Ceder L, Thorngren KG, Sernbo I, Jonsson B (2008) Long-term cost and effect on quality of life of osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Acta Orthop 79:269–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bessette L, Jean S, Lapointe-Garant MP, Belzile EL, Davison KS, Ste-Marie LG, Brown JP (2012) Direct medical costs attributable to peripheral fractures in Canadian post-menopausal women. Osteoporos Int 23:1757–1768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hopkins RB, Tarride JE, Leslie WD, Metge C, Lix LM, Morin S, Finlayson G, Azimaee M, Pullenayegum E, Goeree R, Adachi JD, Papaioannou A, Thabane L (2013) Estimating the excess costs for patients with incident fractures, prevalent fractures, and nonfracture osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 24:581–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Maravic M, Le BC, Landais P, Fardellone P (2005) Incidence and cost of osteoporotic fractures in France during 2001. A methodological approach by the national hospital database. Osteoporos Int 16:1475–1480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ III (1992) Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985–1989. J Bone Miner Res 7:221–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    van Helden S, Cauberg E, Geusens P, Winkes B, der van Weijden T, Brink P ((2007) The fracture and osteoporosis outpatient clinic: an effective strategy for improving implementation of an osteoporosis guideline. J Eval Clin Pract 13:801–805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. A. Eekman
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  • M. M. ter Wee
    • 1
  • V. M. H. Coupé
    • 2
  • S. Erisek-Demirtas
    • 1
  • M. H. Kramer
    • 3
  • W. F. Lems
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RheumatologyVU Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology &BiostatisticsVU Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Internal MedicineVU Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of rheumatology ZH3A-52VU University HospitalAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations