Skip to main content
Log in

Indirect costs account for half of the total costs of an osteoporotic fracture: a prospective evaluation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Data on direct and indirect costs of clinical fractures in 116 osteoporotic patients 50 years and older were prospectively collected using cost diaries. Indirect costs accounted for roughly half of the total costs, with a contribution of at least 81 % of these costs in employed patients.

Introduction

The aim of this prospective study was to gain insight into the current total costs of clinical fractures in osteoporotic patients aged 50 years and older.

Methods

In a study in the Netherlands, patients prospectively filled out cost diaries every 3 months, during 1 year after a clinical fracture. Primary analyses were performed on those patients with all four cost diaries returned. In-depth analyses of indirect costs were performed, dividing results for employed and unemployed patients. Sensitivity analyses using imputation techniques were performed on patients who returned two or three diaries

Results

Of the 116 included patients, 69 completed all four diaries, 24 only two or three, and 23 patient completed one or no diaries. For all fractures, approximately 50 % of the total costs were due to indirect costs; employed patients contributed for at least 81 % of the indirect cost. Humerus fractures were most expensive with a total 1-year cost of €16.841 per patient. Indirect costs in the group with clinical spine fractures were highest (€12.522), accounting for 89.1 % of the total costs for this fracture.

Conclusion

Indirect costs account for roughly half of the total costs of clinical fractures, which are largely related to sick leave. When performing cost analyses in fracture patients, we advise a societal perspective in which indirect costs are also considered, and to apply a patient derived prospective data collection method to get a ‘true’ and complete image of the total costs due to clinical fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sambrook P, Cooper C (2006) Osteoporos Lancet 367:2010–2018

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Reumatologie. (2011) CBO richtlijn osteoporose en fractuurpreventie

  3. De Laet CE, van Hout BA, Hofman A, Pols HA (1996) Costs due to osteoporosis-induced fractures in the Netherlands; possibilities for cost control. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 140:1684–1688

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lippuner K, Golder M, Greiner R (2005) Epidemiology and direct medical costs of osteoporotic fractures in men and women in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S8–S17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roux C, Wyman A, Hooven FH, Gehlbach SH, Adachi JD, Chapurlat RD, Compston JE, Cooper C, Ez-Perez A, Greenspan SL, Lacroix AZ, Netelenbos JC, Pfeilschifter J, Rossini M, Saag KG, Sambrook PN, Silverman S, Siris ES, Watts NB, Boonen S (2012) Burden of non-hip, non-vertebral fractures on quality of life in postmenopausal women: the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW). Osteoporos Int 23:2863–2871

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tarride JE, Guo N, Hopkins R, Leslie WD, Morin S, Adachi JD, Papaioannou A, Bessette L, Brown JP, Goeree R (2012) The burden of illness of osteoporosis in Canadian men. J Bone Miner Res 27:1830–1838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tarride JE, Hopkins RB, Leslie WD, Morin S, Adachi JD, Papaioannou A, Bessette L, Brown JP, Goeree R (2012) The burden of illness of osteoporosis in Canada. Osteoporos Int 23:2591–2600

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McGowan B, Casey MC, Silke C, Whelan B, Bennett K (2012) Hospitalisations for fracture and associated costs between 2000 and 2009 in Ireland: a trend analysis. Osteoporos Int 24:849–857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Piscitelli P, Gimigliano F, Gatto S, Marinelli A, Gimigliano A, Marinelli P, Chitano G, Greco M, Di PL, Sbenaglia E, Benvenuto M, Muratore M, Quarta E, Calcagnile F, Coli G, Borgia O, Forcina B, Fitto F, Giordano A, Distante A, Rossini M, Angeli A, Migliore A, Guglielmi G, Guida G, Brandi ML, Gimigliano R, Iolascon G (2010) Hip fractures in Italy: 2000–2005 extension study. Osteoporos Int 21:1323–1330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Parthan A, Kruse M, Yurgin N, Huang J, Viswanathan HN, Taylor D. (2013) Cost Effectiveness of Denosumab versus Oral Bisphosphonates for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis in the US. Appl Health Econ Health Policy

  11. Goossens ME, Rutten-van Molken MP, Vlaeyen JW, van der Linden SM (2000) The cost diary: a method to measure direct and indirect costs in cost-effectiveness research. J Clin Epidemiol 53:688–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pike CT, Birnbaum HG, Schiller M, Swallow E, Burge RT, Edgell ET (2011) Prevalence and costs of osteoporotic patients with subsequent non-vertebral fractures in the US. Osteoporos Int 22:2611–2621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dimai HP, Redlich K, Peretz M, Borgstrom F, Siebert U, Mahlich J (2012) Economic burden of osteoporotic fractures in Austria. Health Econ Rev 2:12

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rabenda V, Manette C, Lemmens R, Mariani AM, Struvay N, Reginster JY (2006) The direct and indirect costs of the chronic management of osteoporosis: a prospective follow-up of 3440 active subjects. Osteoporos Int 17:1346–1352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eisman JA, Bogoch ER, Dell R, Harrington JT, McKinney RE Jr, McLellan A, Mitchell PJ, Silverman S, Singleton R, Siris E (2012) Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASBMR task force report on secondary fracture prevention. J Bone Miner Res 27:2039–2046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eekman D, van Helden S, Huisman A, Verhaar H, Bultink I, Geusens P, Lips P, Lems W. (2013) Optimizing fracture prevention: the fracture liaison service, an observational study. Osteoporos Int. doi:10.1530/boneabs.1.PP43

  17. Coupe VM, Veenhof C, van Tulder MW, Dekker J, Bijlsma JW, Van den Ende CH (2007) The cost effectiveness of behavioural graded activity in patients with osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee. Ann Rheum Dis 66:215–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oostenbrink JB, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF (2002) Standardisation of costs: the Dutch manual for costing in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics 20:443–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Medicijnkosten. Themasite van het College voor zorgverzekeringen (CVZ). (2012) Medication costs. Accessed on 26 June 2012

  20. Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF (1996) A practical guide for calculating indirect costs of disease. Pharmacoeconomics 10:460–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Busschbach JJ, Brouwer WB, van der Donk A, Passchier J, Rutten FF (1998) An outline for a cost-effectiveness analysis of a drug for patients with Alzheimer's disease. Pharmacoeconomics 13:21–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Barber JA, Thompson SG (2000) Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the non-parametric bootstrap. Stat Med 19:3219–3236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thompson SG, Barber JA (2000) How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed? BMJ 320:1197–1200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gutierrez L, Roskell N, Castellsague J, Beard S, Rycroft C, Abeysinghe S, Shannon P, Gitlin M, Robbins S (2012) Clinical burden and incremental cost of fractures in postmenopausal women in the United Kingdom. Bone 51:324–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McLellan AR, Gallacher SJ, Fraser M, McQuillian C (2003) The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 14:1028–1034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Strom O, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Lidgren L, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Abdon P, Ornstein E, Ceder L, Thorngren KG, Sernbo I, Jonsson B (2008) Long-term cost and effect on quality of life of osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Acta Orthop 79:269–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bessette L, Jean S, Lapointe-Garant MP, Belzile EL, Davison KS, Ste-Marie LG, Brown JP (2012) Direct medical costs attributable to peripheral fractures in Canadian post-menopausal women. Osteoporos Int 23:1757–1768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hopkins RB, Tarride JE, Leslie WD, Metge C, Lix LM, Morin S, Finlayson G, Azimaee M, Pullenayegum E, Goeree R, Adachi JD, Papaioannou A, Thabane L (2013) Estimating the excess costs for patients with incident fractures, prevalent fractures, and nonfracture osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 24:581–593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Maravic M, Le BC, Landais P, Fardellone P (2005) Incidence and cost of osteoporotic fractures in France during 2001. A methodological approach by the national hospital database. Osteoporos Int 16:1475–1480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ III (1992) Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985–1989. J Bone Miner Res 7:221–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. van Helden S, Cauberg E, Geusens P, Winkes B, der van Weijden T, Brink P ((2007) The fracture and osteoporosis outpatient clinic: an effective strategy for improving implementation of an osteoporosis guideline. J Eval Clin Pract 13:801–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. A. Eekman.

Additional information

D. A. Eekman and M. M. ter Wee contributed equally.

Appendix 1: cost diary

Appendix 1: cost diary

Complaints related to your fracture in the upcoming 3 months

  • are you unable to perform paid work?

    Number of days sick leave

    Total number of hours of sick leave

    E.g. 5 days

    36 hours

  • … are you unable to perform unpaid work? (e.g. voluntary work, housekeeping)

    Number of days

    Total number of hours

    E.g. 2 days

    4 hours

  • … have you visited or consulted your general practitioner?

    Number of visits/consultations

    Type of visit or consultation (consultation by telephone, at the practice or home visit by GP)

    E.g. 3 visits

    Visit to the practice

  • … have you received a medication prescription?

    Name of medication

    Number of pills and dosage

    Total used amount

    E.g. diclofenac

    12 pills, 50 mg

    3 pills a day during 4 days

  • … have you purchased medication yourself? (e.g. acetaminophen)

    Name of medication

    Number of pills and dosage

    Total used amount

    E.g. ibuprofen

    20 pillen van 400 mg

    1 pill a day during 6 days

  • … have you purchased other medical aids? (e.g. massage oil, brace)

    Date of purchase

    Type of aid

    Price

    E.g. May 30th

    Brace

    € 85

  • … have you visited a therapist? (e.g. physiotherapist, chiropractor)

    Number of visits

    Type of therapist

    E.g. 10 visits

    Physiotherapist

  • … have you visited an alternative medicine specialist? (e.g. specialized in homeopathy, acupuncture)

    Number of visits

    Type of therapist

    E.g. 2 visits

    Acupuncturist

  • … have you visited a specialist? (e.g. orthopedic surgeon, neurologist)

    Number of visits

    Type of specialist

    E.g. 1 visit

    Orthopedic surgeon

  • … were radiological or laboratory tests done in the hospital? (e.g. X-ray, MRI-scan, blood test, DXA scan)

    Type of test

    Number of tests

    e.g. X-ray

    2

  • …. have you been admitted to the hospital?

    Number of days

    Which department?

    What was the reason for admission?

    E.g. admitted for 5 days

    Orthopedic surgery

    Operation wrist

Room for remarks/costs that do not fit into the tables:

(please be as specific as possible when describing the costs).

Thank you for filling out these forms!!!

Please send this diary as soon as you have completed it

Appendix 2

Table 4 Costs per unit healthcare resource used in relation to the fracture

Appendix 3

Table 5 Sensitivity analyses (n = 93), mean cost per patient in euro

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eekman, D.A., ter Wee, M.M., Coupé, V.M.H. et al. Indirect costs account for half of the total costs of an osteoporotic fracture: a prospective evaluation. Osteoporos Int 25, 195–204 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2505-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2505-4

Keywords

Navigation