Advertisement

Osteoporosis International

, Volume 23, Issue 9, pp 2313–2320 | Cite as

Three years of alendronate treatment does not continue to decrease microstructural stresses and strains associated with trabecular microdamage initiation beyond those at 1 year

  • J. O. Green
  • T. Diab
  • M. R. Allen
  • B. Vidakovic
  • D. B. Burr
  • R. E. GuldbergEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Summary

The effects of a 3-year alendronate treatment on trabecular stresses/strains associated with microdamage initiation were investigated using finite element modeling (FEM). Severely damaged trabeculae in the low-dose treatment group were associated with increased stresses compared with the high-dose treatment group (p = 0.006) and approached significance in the control group (p = 0.02).

Introduction

Alendronate, a commonly prescribed anti-remodeling agent, decreases fracture risk in the vertebrae, hip, and wrist of osteoporotic individuals. However, evaluation of microdamage accumulation in animal and human studies shows increased microdamage density relative to controls. Microstructural von Mises stresses associated with severe and linear damage have been found to decrease after 1 year of alendronate treatment. In the present study, stresses/strains associated with damage were assessed after 3 years of treatment to determine whether they continued to decrease with increased treatment duration.

Methods

Microdamaged trabeculae visualized with fluorescent microscopy were associated with stresses and strains obtained using image-based FEM. Stresses/strains associated with severe, diffuse, and linearly damaged and undamaged trabeculae were compared among groups treated for 3 years with an osteoporotic treatment dose of alendronate, a Paget’s disease treatment dose of alendronate, or saline control. Architectural characteristics and mineralization were also analyzed from three-dimensional microcomputed tomography reconstructed images.

Results

Severely damaged trabeculae in the osteoporotic treatment dose group were associated with increased stress compared with the Paget’s disease treatment dose group (p = 0.006) and approached significance compared to the control group (p = 0.02). Trabecular mineralization in severely damaged trabeculae of the low-dose treatment group was significantly greater compared to severely damaged trabeculae in the high-dose treatment and control group, suggesting that changes at the tissue level may play a role in these findings.

Conclusions

Trabecular level stresses associated with microdamage do not continue to decrease with prolonged alendronate treatment. Changes in mineralization may account for these findings.

Keywords

Bisphosphonate Finite element modeling Microcomputed tomography Microdamage Osteoporosis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by NIH grants 5R01AG027249, 5R01AR047838, and 5T32AR007581. Merck kindly provided the alendronate. The micro-CT system was provided by an NSF Major Research Instrumentation Award (9977551).

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Burr receives grant/research support from Eli Lilly, Procter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals, The Alliance for Better Bone Health, Pfizer, and NephroGenex. He is a consultant/scientific advisor for Eli Lilly, Procter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, and PharmaLegacy. He is a speaker for Amgen and Eli Lilly. The other authors have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Nevitt MC, Bauer DC, Genant HK, Haskell WL, Marcus R, Ott SM, Torner JC, Quandt SA, Reiss TF, Ensrud KE (1996) Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture intervention trial research group. Lancet 348(9041):1535–1541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Black DM, Thompson DE, Bauer DC, Ensrud K, Musliner T, Hochberg MC, Nevitt MC, Suryawanshi S, Cummings SR (2000) Fracture risk reduction with alendronate in women with osteoporosis: the fracture intervention trial. FIT research group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85(11):4118–4124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rodan GA, Reszka AA (2002) Bisphosphonate mechanism of action. Curr Mol Med 2(6):571–577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allen MR, Burr DB (2007) Mineralization, microdamage, and matrix: how bisphosphonates influence material properties of bone. Bone Key Osteovision 4(2):49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tang SY, Allen MR, Phipps R, Burr DB, Vashishth D (2009) Changes in non-enzymatic glycation and its association with altered mechanical properties following 1-year treatment with risedronate or alendronate. Osteoporos Int 20(6):887–894PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Allen MR, Iwata K, Phipps R, Burr DB (2006) Alterations in canine vertebral bone turnover, microdamage accumulation, and biomechanical properties following 1-year treatment with clinical treatment doses of risedronate or alendronate. Bone 39(4):872–879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stepan JJ, Burr DB, Pavo I, Sipos A, Michalska D, Li J, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Petto H, Westmore M, Michalsky D, Sato M, Dobnig H (2007) Low bone mineral density is associated with bone microdamage accumulation in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Bone 41(3):378–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mashiba T, Hirano T, Turner CH, Forwood MR, Johnston CC, Burr DB (2000) Suppressed bone turnover by bisphosphonates increases microdamage accumulation and reduces some biomechanical properties in dog rib. J Bone Miner Res 15(4):613–620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schaffler MB, Radin EL, Burr DB (1989) Mechanical and morphological effects of strain rate on fatigue of compact bone. Bone 10(3):207–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ruppel ME, Burr DB, Miller LM (2006) Chemical makeup of microdamaged bone differs from undamaged bone. Bone 39(2):318–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shane E, Burr D, Ebeling PR, Abrahamsen B, Adler RA, Brown TD, Cheung AM, Cosman F, Curtis JR, Dell R, Dempster D, Einhorn TA, Genant HK, Geusens P, Klaushofer K, Koval K, Lane JM, McKiernan F, McKinney R, Ng A, Nieves J, O'Keefe R, Papapoulos S, Sen HT, van der Meulen MC, Weinstein RS, Whyte M (2010) American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res 25(11):2267–2294Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yeni YN, Zelman EA, Divine GW, Kim DG, Fyhrie DP (2008) Trabecular shear stress amplification and variability in human vertebral cancellous bone: relationship with age, gender, spine level and trabecular architecture. Bone 42(3):591–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fyhrie DP, Hoshaw SJ, Hamid MS, Hou FJ (2000) Shear stress distribution in the trabeculae of human vertebral bone. Ann Biomed Eng 28(10):1194–1199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nagaraja S, Couse TL, Guldberg RE (2005) Trabecular bone microdamage and microstructural stresses under uniaxial compression. J Biomech 38(4):707–716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O'Neal JM, Diab T, Allen MR, Vidakovic B, Burr DB, Guldberg RE (2010) One year of alendronate treatment lowers microstructural stresses associated with trabecular microdamage initiation. Bone 47(2):241–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Allen MR, Burr DB (2007) Three years of alendronate treatment results in similar levels of vertebral microdamage as after one year of treatment. J Bone Miner Res 22(11):1759–1765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keaveny TM, Pinilla TP, Crawford RP, Kopperdahl DL, Lou A (1997) Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone. J Orthop Res 15(1):101–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    O'Brien FJ, Taylor D, Lee TC (2002) An improved labelling technique for monitoring microcrack growth in compact bone. J Biomech 35(4):523–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moore ATL, Gibson LJ (2002) Microdamage accumulation in bovine trabecular bone in uniaxial compression. J Biomech Eng 124(1):63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    van Rietbergen B, Weinans H, Huiskes R (1996) Computational strategies for iterative solutions of large FEM applications employing voxel data. Int J Numer Methods Eng 39:2743–2767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    van Rietbergen B, Weinans H (1995) Huiskes R, Odgaard A, A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models. J Biomech 28(1):69–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boivin G, Meunier PJ (2002) Effects of bisphosphonates on matrix mineralization. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2(6):538–543PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shi X, Liu XS, Wang X, Guo XE, Niebur GL (2010) Effects of trabecular type and orientation on microdamage susceptibility in trabecular bone. Bone 46(5):1260–1266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Arlot ME, Burt-Pichat B, Roux J-P, Vashishth D, Bouxsein ML, Delmas PD (2008) Microarchitecture influences microdamage accumulation in human vertebral trabecular bone. J Bone Miner Res 23(10):1613–1618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Allen MR, Reinwald S, Burr DB (2008) Alendronate reduces bone toughness of ribs without significantly increasing microdamage accumulation in dogs following 3 years of daily treatment. Calcif Tissue Int 82(5):354–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Allen MR, Gineyts E, Leeming DJ, Burr DB, Delmas PD (2008) Bisphosphonates alter trabecular bone collagen cross-linking and isomerization in beagle dog vertebra. Osteoporos Int 19(3):329–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. O. Green
    • 1
    • 2
  • T. Diab
    • 1
  • M. R. Allen
    • 3
  • B. Vidakovic
    • 4
  • D. B. Burr
    • 3
    • 5
  • R. E. Guldberg
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Parker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience and George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.School of MedicineMedical College of GeorgiaAugustaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Anatomy and Cell BiologyIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA
  4. 4.Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  5. 5.Department of Biomedical EngineeringIndiana University–Purdue University at IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations