Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Forearm bone mineral density changes during postpartum and the effects of breastfeeding, amenorrhea, body mass index and contraceptive use

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Prospective cohort study performed to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) changes up to 12 months postpartum of healthy women and its association with breastfeeding, contraceptive methods, amenorrhea, and body mass index (BMI). There is a trend in bone loss during the first 6 months with posterior recovery, with evidence of a protective effect of hormonal contraception.

Introduction

This study was conducted to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) changes during postpartum period among healthy women and its association with breastfeeding, use of contraceptive methods, amenorrhea and body mass index (BMI).

Methods

A prospective cohort study including 100 healthy women. Distal BMD was measured 7–10 days, 3, 6, and 12 months postpartum at the nondominant forearm using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Data about breastfeeding duration, amenorrhea, contraceptive use and BMI were collected.

Results

Seventy-eight women had a complete set of BMD measurements. The mean duration of exclusive breastfeeding was 125.9 (±66.6) days, with a median total lactation period of 263.5 days. The mean duration of amenorrhea was 164.2 (±119.2) days. BMD measurements showed a significant decrease in the distal radius, however with no significance in the ultradistal radius. When considering only the nonhormonal contraceptive users, the difference at 12 months was significant. Multivariate analysis of variance showed that both BMI and contraceptive use were significantly correlated with BMD. Multiple linear regression analysis showed significant correlation of distal radius with baseline BMD at the same site, pregestational BMI, age, years of schooling and difference in BMI. For ultradistal radius, there was a significant direct correlation with its baseline BMD and pregestational BMI.

Conclusions

There was a trend in bone loss during the first 6 months postpartum with posterior recovery. Also, hormonal contraceptive methods provided protection of bone loss. However, the long duration of breastfeeding and the follow-up were not sufficient to draw definitive conclusions on postweaning BMD conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO—World Health Organization (2000). Prevention and management of osteoporosis: report of a WHO Scientific Group. Report series 921. Geneva, WHO, 194p. Available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/who_trs_921.pdf Access on 12/05/2011

  2. Lenora J, Lekamwasam S, Karlsson MK (2009) Effects of multiparity and prolonged breast-feeding on maternal bone mineral density: a community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health 1:19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ensom MH, Liu PY, Stephenson MD (2002) Effect of pregnancy on bone mineral density in healthy women. Obstet Gynecol Surv 57(2):99–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Karlsson MK, Ahlborg HG, Karlsson C (2005) Female reproductive history and the skeleton—a review. BJOG 112(7):851–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Laskey MA, Prentice A (1997) Effect of pregnancy on recovery of lactational bone loss. Lancet 349(9064):1518–1519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Holmberg-Marttila D, Sievänen H, Laippala P, Tuimala R (2000) Factors underlying changes in bone mineral during postpartum amenorrhea and lactation. Osteoporos Int 11(7):570–576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kish L (1965). Survey sampling. New York: Wiley, 1st ed

  8. Eis SR, Lewiecki EM (2006) Peripheral bone densitometry: Clinical applications. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 50(4):596–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. ISCD—The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (2007). 2007 ISCD official positions. Available at http://www.iscd.org/visitors/positions/OfficialPositionsText.cfm Access on 12/05/2011

  10. Drinkwater B, Chesnut CH 3rd (1991) Bone density changes during pregnancy and lactation in active women: a longitudinal study. Bone Miner 14(2):153–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sowers M, Corton G, Shapiro B, Jannausch ML, Crutchfield M, Smith ML, Randolph JF, Hollis B (1993) Changes in bone density with lactation. JAMA 269(24):33130–33135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Affinito P, Tommaselli GA, di Carlo C, Guida F, Nappi C (1996) Changes in bone mineral density and calcium metabolism in breastfeeding women: a one year follow-up study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81(6):2314–2318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Laskey MA, Prentice A (1999) Bone mineral changes during and after lactation. Obstet Gynecol 94(4):608–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. More C, Bettembuk P, Bhattoa HP, Balogh A (2001) The effects of pregnancy and lactation on bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 12(9):732–737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sena MCF, Silva EF, Pereira MG (2007) Trends of breastfeeding in Brazil during the last quarter of XXth century. Rev Bras Epidemiol 10(4):499–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. IBGE—Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2010). [Study on family budgets 2008–2009. Antropometrical and nutritional status of children, adolescents and adults in Brazil]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 130p. Available at http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/condicaodevida/pof/2008_2009_encaa/pof_20082009_encaa.pdf Access on 12/05/2011

  17. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19(4):385–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. De Laet C, Kanis JA, Odén A, Johanson H, Johnell O, Delmas P, Eisman JA, Kroger H, Fujiwara S, Garnero P, McCloskey EV, Mellstrom D, Melton LJ 3rd, Meunier PJ, Pols HA, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A (2005) Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 16(11):1330–1338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support was received from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) under the grant 2006/04555-3, and also from the FAEPEX/UNICAMP through the grant 421/2010.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. G. Cecatti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costa, M.L., Krupa, F.G., Rehder, P.M. et al. Forearm bone mineral density changes during postpartum and the effects of breastfeeding, amenorrhea, body mass index and contraceptive use. Osteoporos Int 23, 1691–1698 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1767-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1767-y

Keywords

Navigation