Osteoporosis International

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 1277–1286 | Cite as

Non-elite gymnastics participation is associated with greater bone strength, muscle size, and function in pre- and early pubertal girls

  • L. A. Burt
  • G. A. Naughton
  • D. A. Greene
  • D. Courteix
  • G. Ducher
Original Article

Abstract

Summary

Recent reports indicate an increase in forearm fractures in children. Bone geometric properties are an important determinant of bone strength and therefore fracture risk. Participation in non-elite gymnastics appears to contribute to improving young girls’ musculoskeletal health, more specifically in the upper body.

Introduction

The primary aim of this study was to determine the association between non-elite gymnastics participation and upper limb bone mass, geometry, and strength in addition to muscle size and function in young girls.

Methods

Eighty-eight pre- and early pubertal girls (30 high-training gymnasts [HGYM, 6–16 hr/ wk], 29 low-training gymnasts [LGYM, 1–5 h r/wk] and 29 non-gymnasts [NONGYM]), aged 6–11 years were recruited. Upper limb lean mass, BMD and BMC were derived from a whole body DXA scan. Forearm volumetric BMD, bone geometry, estimated strength, and muscle CSA were determined using peripheral QCT. Upper body muscle function was investigated with muscle strength, explosive power, and muscle endurance tasks.

Results

HGYM showed greater forearm bone strength compared with NGYM, as well as greater arm lean mass, BMC, and muscle function (+5% to +103%, p < 0.05). LGYM displayed greater arm lean mass, BMC, muscle power, and endurance than NGYM (+4% to +46%, p < 0.05); however, the difference in bone strength did not reach significance. Estimated fracture risk at the distal radius, which accounted for body weight, was lower in both groups of gymnasts. Compared with NONGYM, HGYM tended to show larger skeletal differences than LGYM; yet, the two groups of gymnasts only differed for arm lean mass and muscle CSA.

Conclusion

Non-elite gymnastics participation was associated with musculoskeletal benefits in upper limb bone geometry, strength and muscle function. Differences between the two gymnastic groups emerged for arm lean mass and muscle CSA, but not for bone strength.

Keywords

Artistic Gymnastics Musculoskeletal Peripheral quantitative computed tomography Pre-puberty Upper limb 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was partially sponsored by the NSW Sporting Injuries Committee. The investigators are grateful to the participants and families for generously providing consent and time to support the project.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Bass SL, Pearce G, Bradney M, Hendrich E, Delmas PD, Harding A, Seeman E (1998) Exercise before puberty may confer residual benefits in bone density in adulthood: studies in active prepubertal and retired female gymnasts. J Bone Miner Res 13:500–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ward KA, Roberts SA, Adams JE, Mughal MZ (2005) Bone geometry and density in the skeleton of pre-pubertal gymnasts and school children. Bone 36:1012–1018PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liang MTC, Arnaud SB, Steele CR, Hatch P, Moreno A (2005) Ulnar and tibial bending stiffness as an index of bone strength in synchronized swimmers and gymnasts. Eur J Appl Physiol 94:400–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eser P, Hill B, Ducher G, Bass SL (2009) Skeletal benefits after long-term retirement in former elite female gymnasts. J Bone Miner Res 24:1981–1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pollock NK, Laing EM, Modlesky CM, O’Connor PJ, Lewis RD (2006) Former college artistic gymnasts maintain higher BMD: a nine-year follow-up. Osteoporos Int 17:1691–1697PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    DiFiori JP, Puffer JC, Mandelbaum BR, Dorey F (1997) Distal radial growth plate injury and positive ulnar variance in nonelite gymnasts. Am J Sports Med 25:763–768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laing EM, Wilson AR, Modlesky CM, O’Connor PJ, Hall DB, Lewis RD (2005) Initial years of recreational artistic gymnastics training improves lumbar spine bone mineral accrual in 4- to 8-year-old females. J Bone Miner Res 20:509–519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scerpella TA, Davenport M, Morganti CM, Kanaley JA, Johnson LM (2003) Dose related association of impact activity and bone mineral density in pre-pubertal girls. Calcif Tissue Int 72:24–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vincent-Rodriguez G, Dorado C, Ara I, Perez-Gomez J, Olmedillas H, Delgado-Guerra S, Calbet JAL (2007) Artistic verses rhythmic gymnastics: effects on bone and muscle mass in young girls. Int J Sports Med 28:386–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zanker CL, Gannon L, Cooke CB, Gee KL, Oldroyd B, Truscott JG (2003) Differences in bone density, body composition, physical activity, and diet between gymnasts and untrained children 7–8 years of age. J Bone Miner Res 18:1043–1050PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prentice A, Parsons TJ, Cole T (1994) Uncritical use of bone mineral density in absorptiometry may lead to size-related artifacts in the identification of bone mineral determinants. Am J Clin Nutr 60:837–842PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Erlandson MC, Kontulainen SA, Baxter-Jones ADG (2011) Precompetitive and recreational gymnasts have greater bone density, mass, and estimated strength at the distal radius in young childhood. Osteoporos Int 22:75–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kalkwarf HJ, Laor T, Bean JA (2011) Fracture risk in children with a forearm injury is associated with volumetric bone density and cortical area (by peripheral QCT) and areal bone density (by DXA). Osteoporos Int 22:607–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khosla S, Melton L III, Dekutoski M, Achenbach S, Oberg A, Riggs B (2003) Incidence of childhood distal forearm fractures over 30 years: a population-based study. J Am Med Assoc 290:1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mäyränpää MK, Mäkitie O, Kallio PE (2010) Decreasing incidence and changing pattern of childhood fractures: A population based study. J Bone Miner Res 25:2476–2483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bencke J, Damsgaard R, Saekmose A, Jorgensen P, Klausen K (2002) Anaerobic power and muscle strength characteristics of 11 years old elite and non-elite boys and girls from gymnastics, team handball, tennis and swimming. Scand J Med Sci Sports 12:171–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jürimäe J, Jürimäe T (2005) Bone mineral density in adolescent girls with different physical activity patterns: relationships with body composition and muscle performance parameters. Pap Anthropol 14:126–131Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Caine DJ, Cochrane B, Caine C, Zemper E (1989) An epidemiologic investigation of injuries affecting young competitive female gymnasts. Am J Sports Med 17:811–820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Theintz GE, Howald H, Weiss U, Sizonenko PC (1993) Evidence for a reduction of growth potential in adolescent female gymnasts. J Pediatr 122:306–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ducher G, Jaffré C, Arlettaz A, Benhamou C, Courteix D (2005) Effects of long-term tennis playing on the muscle-bone relationship in the dominant and nondominant forearms. Can J Appl Physiol 30:3–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Neu CM, Manz F, Rauch F, Merkel A, Schoenau E (2001) Bone densities and bone size at the distal radius in healthy children and adolescents: a study using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Bone 28:227–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rauch F, Schoenau E (2005) Peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the distal radius in young subjects–new reference data and interpretation of results. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 5:119–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kontulainen S, Sievänen H, Kannus P, Pasanen M, Vuori I (2003) Effect of long-term impact-loading on mass, size, and estimated strength of humerus and radius of female racquet-sports players: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study between young and old starters and controls. J Bone Miner Res 17:2281–2289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rauch F, Neu CM, Manz F, Schoenau E (2001) The development of metaphyseal cortex—implications for distal radius fractures during growth. J Bone Miner Res 16:1547–1555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Orjan E, Kristjan O, Bjorn E (2005) Physical performance and body mass index in Swedish children and adolescents. Scand J Nutr 49:172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Davis KL, Kang M, Boswell BB, Dubose KD, Altman SR, Binkley HM (2008) Validity and reliability of the medicine ball throw for kindergarten children. J Strength Cond Res 22:1958–1963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pate RR, Burgess ML, Woods JA, Ross JG, Baumgartner T (1993) Validity of field tests of upper body muscular strength. Res Q Exerc Sport 64:17–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fricke O, Weidler J, Tutlewski B, Schoenau E (2006) Mechanography-a new device for the assessment of muscle function in pediatrics. Pediatr Res 59:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Duke PM, Litt IF, Gross RT (1980) Adolescents’ self-assessment of sexual maturation. Pediatrics 66:918–920PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Peat JK, Barton B (2005) Medical statistics: A guide to data analysis and critical appraisal. Blackwell, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Poynton TA (2007) EZAnalyze (Version 3.0) In Computer software and manual. Retrieved from http://www.ezanalyze.com
  32. 32.
    Dyson K, Blimkie CJR, Davison KS, Webber CE, Adachi JD (1997) Gymnastic training and bone density in pre-adolescent females. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:443PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ducher G, Hill BL, Angeli T, Bass SL, Eser P (2009) Comparison of pQCT parameters between ulna and radius in retired elite gymnasts: the skeletal benefits associated with long-term gymnastics are bone-and site-specific. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 9:247–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Panzer VP, Wood GA, Bates BT, Mason BR (1988) Lower extremity loads in landings of elite gymnasts. In: de Groot G, Hollander P, Huijing P, Van Ingen Schenau GJ (eds) Biomechanics XI-B. Free University Press, Amsterdam, pp 727–735Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dowthwaite JN, Flowers PPE, Spadaro JA, Scerpella TA (2007) Bone geometry, density and strength indicies of the distal radius reflect loading via childhood gymnastics activity. J Clin Densitom 10:65–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dowthwaite JN, Kanaley JA, Spadaro JA, Hickman RM, Scerpella TA (2009) Muscle indices do not fully account for enhanced upper extremity bone mass and strength in gymnasts. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 9:2–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dowthwaite JN, Scerpella TA (2011) Distal radius geometry and skeletal strength indices after peripubertal artistic gymnastics. Osteoporos Int 22:207–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ma DQ, Jones G (2002) Clinical risk factors but not bone density are associated with prevalent fractures in prepubertal children. J Paediatr Child Health 38:497–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    DeGoede KM, Ashton-Miller JA (2002) Fall arrest strategy affects peak hand impact force in a forward fall. J Biomech 35:843–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Burt LA, Naughton GA, Higham DG, Landeo R (2010) Quantifying training load in pre-pubertal artistic gymnastics. Sci Gymnastics J 2:5–14Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sanchis-Moysi J, Dorado C, Olmedillas H, Serrano-Sanchez JA, Calbet JA (2010) Bone Mass in Prepubertal Tennis Players. Int J Sports Med 31:416–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Daly RM, Saxon L, Turner CH, Robling AG, Bass SL (2004) The relationship between muscle size and bone geometry during growth and in response to exercise. Bone 34:281–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Taaffe DR, Marcus R (2004) The muscle strength and bone density relationship in young women: dependence on exercise status. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 44:98–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hangartner TN, Gilsanz V (1996) Evaluation of cortical bone by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 11:1518–1525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. A. Burt
    • 1
  • G. A. Naughton
    • 1
  • D. A. Greene
    • 1
  • D. Courteix
    • 2
  • G. Ducher
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre of Physical Activity Across the LifespanAustralian Catholic UniversityStrathfieldAustralia
  2. 2.Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie des APSClermont Université, Université Blaise Pascal, FranceAubiere CedexFrance
  3. 3.Noll Laboratory, Department of KinesiologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations