Non-elite gymnastics participation is associated with greater bone strength, muscle size, and function in pre- and early pubertal girls
- 997 Downloads
Recent reports indicate an increase in forearm fractures in children. Bone geometric properties are an important determinant of bone strength and therefore fracture risk. Participation in non-elite gymnastics appears to contribute to improving young girls’ musculoskeletal health, more specifically in the upper body.
The primary aim of this study was to determine the association between non-elite gymnastics participation and upper limb bone mass, geometry, and strength in addition to muscle size and function in young girls.
Eighty-eight pre- and early pubertal girls (30 high-training gymnasts [HGYM, 6–16 hr/ wk], 29 low-training gymnasts [LGYM, 1–5 h r/wk] and 29 non-gymnasts [NONGYM]), aged 6–11 years were recruited. Upper limb lean mass, BMD and BMC were derived from a whole body DXA scan. Forearm volumetric BMD, bone geometry, estimated strength, and muscle CSA were determined using peripheral QCT. Upper body muscle function was investigated with muscle strength, explosive power, and muscle endurance tasks.
HGYM showed greater forearm bone strength compared with NGYM, as well as greater arm lean mass, BMC, and muscle function (+5% to +103%, p < 0.05). LGYM displayed greater arm lean mass, BMC, muscle power, and endurance than NGYM (+4% to +46%, p < 0.05); however, the difference in bone strength did not reach significance. Estimated fracture risk at the distal radius, which accounted for body weight, was lower in both groups of gymnasts. Compared with NONGYM, HGYM tended to show larger skeletal differences than LGYM; yet, the two groups of gymnasts only differed for arm lean mass and muscle CSA.
Non-elite gymnastics participation was associated with musculoskeletal benefits in upper limb bone geometry, strength and muscle function. Differences between the two gymnastic groups emerged for arm lean mass and muscle CSA, but not for bone strength.
KeywordsArtistic Gymnastics Musculoskeletal Peripheral quantitative computed tomography Pre-puberty Upper limb
This project was partially sponsored by the NSW Sporting Injuries Committee. The investigators are grateful to the participants and families for generously providing consent and time to support the project.
Conflicts of interest
- 17.Jürimäe J, Jürimäe T (2005) Bone mineral density in adolescent girls with different physical activity patterns: relationships with body composition and muscle performance parameters. Pap Anthropol 14:126–131Google Scholar
- 23.Kontulainen S, Sievänen H, Kannus P, Pasanen M, Vuori I (2003) Effect of long-term impact-loading on mass, size, and estimated strength of humerus and radius of female racquet-sports players: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study between young and old starters and controls. J Bone Miner Res 17:2281–2289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Peat JK, Barton B (2005) Medical statistics: A guide to data analysis and critical appraisal. Blackwell, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
- 31.Poynton TA (2007) EZAnalyze (Version 3.0) In Computer software and manual. Retrieved from http://www.ezanalyze.com
- 34.Panzer VP, Wood GA, Bates BT, Mason BR (1988) Lower extremity loads in landings of elite gymnasts. In: de Groot G, Hollander P, Huijing P, Van Ingen Schenau GJ (eds) Biomechanics XI-B. Free University Press, Amsterdam, pp 727–735Google Scholar
- 40.Burt LA, Naughton GA, Higham DG, Landeo R (2010) Quantifying training load in pre-pubertal artistic gymnastics. Sci Gymnastics J 2:5–14Google Scholar