Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of subtrochanteric fracture criteria on hip fracture classification

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Hospital diagnosis codes are useful for assessing hip fracture rates in large populations. However, these codes do not reliably differentiate hip fractures that occur in the subtrochanteric region. Identification of subtrochanteric fractures requires review of radiographic images to distinguish these fractures from the more commonly occurring trochanteric fractures.

Purpose

This study examines the accuracy of coded hospital diagnoses for hip fracture compared to fracture site verification based on operative and radiologic data. The variability in subtrochanteric fracture assignment was also examined using different anatomic criteria.

Methods

This retrospective study includes female members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California age 60 years and older with nontraumatic hip fracture during 2007–2008. Anatomic site was verified by operative and radiologic records, including radiographic image review for fractures occurring in the subtrochanteric region. Two different criteria were compared for subtrochanteric fracture.

Results

We identified 2,824 women with incident hip fracture during the 2-year period. The average age was 82.9 ± 8.2 years and 15% were non-White. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) coding was accurate for femoral neck and trochanteric fractures (>90% confirmed by operative/radiologic reports), compared to only 26% for subtrochanteric fractures using the Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) criteria for subtrochanteric fracture. Using OTA classification, 1.3% of hip fractures were assigned as subtrochanteric compared to 4.2% when the criteria were broadened to include the lesser trochanter. Both femoral neck and pertrochanteric fracture rates increased exponentially with age, while age-related rates in subtrochanteric fracture differed by diagnostic classification method; the broader criteria including the lesser trochanter produced age-related trends that mirrored femoral neck and pertrochanteric fractures.

Conclusion

Unlike femoral neck and pertrochanteric fractures, epidemiologic studies of subtrochanteric fractures cannot rely on ICD-9 codes alone. Review of radiologic images using OTA criteria is required for identification of subtrochanteric fractures occurring below the lesser trochanter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hinton RY, Smith GS (1993) The association of age, race, and sex with the location of proximal femoral fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:752–759

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hinton RY, Lennox DW, Ebert FR, Jacobsen SJ, Smith GS (1995) Relative rates of fracture of the hip in the United States. Geographic, sex, and age variations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:695–702

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Levy AR, Mayo NE, Grimard G (1995) Rates of transcervical and pertrochanteric hip fractures in the province of Quebec, Canada, 1981–1992. Am J Epidemiol 142:428–436

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Karagas MR, Lu-Yao GL, Barrett JA, Beach ML, Baron JA (1996) Heterogeneity of hip fracture: age, race, sex, and geographic patterns of femoral neck and trochanteric fractures among the US elderly. Am J Epidemiol 143:677–682

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kannus P, Parkkari J, Sievanen H, Heinonen A, Vuori I, Jarvinen M (1996) Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone 18:57S–63S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Keene GS, Parker MJ, Pryor GA (1993) Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures. BMJ 307:1248–1250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Finsen V, Benum P (1986) The second hip fracture. An epidemiologic study. Acta Orthop Scand 57:431–433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Melton LJ, 3rd, Ilstrup DM, Beckenbaugh RD, Riggs BL (1982) Hip fracture recurrence. A population-based study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 131–138

  9. Leslie WD, O'Donnell S, Jean S, Lagace C, Walsh P, Bancej C, Morin S, Hanley DA, Papaioannou A (2009) Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada. JAMA 302:883–889

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB (2009) Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA 302:1573–1579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Palvanen M, Vuori I, Jarvinen M (2006) Nationwide decline in incidence of hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res 21:1836–1838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Melton LJ 3rd, Atkinson EJ, Madhok R (1996) Downturn in hip fracture incidence. Public Health Rep 111:146–150, discussion 151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nieves JW, Bilezikian JP, Lane JM, Einhorn TA, Wang Y, Steinbuch M, Cosman F (2010) Fragility fractures of the hip and femur: incidence and patient characteristics. Osteoporos Int 21:399–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Z, Bhattacharyya T (2010) Trends in incidence of subtrochanteric fragility fractures and bisphosphonate use among the US elderly, 1996–2007. J Bone Miner Res 26:553–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Odvina CV, Zerwekh JE, Rao DS, Maalouf N, Gottschalk FA, Pak CY (2005) Severely suppressed bone turnover: a potential complication of alendronate therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:1294–1301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goh SK, Yang KY, Koh JS, Wong MK, Chua SY, Chua DT, Howe TS (2007) Subtrochanteric insufficiency fractures in patients on alendronate therapy: a caution. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:349–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kwek EB, Goh SK, Koh JS, Png MA, Howe TS (2008) An emerging pattern of subtrochanteric stress fractures: a long-term complication of alendronate therapy? Injury 39:224–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Neviaser AS, Lane JM, Lenart BA, Edobor-Osula F, Lorich DG (2008) Low-energy femoral shaft fractures associated with alendronate use. J Orthop Trauma 22:346–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lenart BA, Neviaser AS, Lyman S, Chang CC, Edobor-Osula F, Steele B, van der Meulen MC, Lorich DG, Lane JM (2009) Association of low-energy femoral fractures with prolonged bisphosphonate use: a case control study. Osteoporos Int 20:1353–1362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Odvina CV, Levy S, Rao S, Zerwekh JE, Rao DS (2010) Unusual mid-shaft fractures during long-term bisphosphonate therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 72:161–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nieves JW, Cosman F (2010) Atypical subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures and possible association with bisphosphonates. Curr Osteoporos Rep 8:34–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shane E, Burr D, Ebeling PR et al (2010) Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res 25:2267–2294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Loizou CL, McNamara I, Ahmed K, Pryor GA, Parker MJ (2010) Classification of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Injury 41:739–745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J et al (2007) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium—2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 21:S1–S133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Seinsheimer F (1978) Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:300–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fielding JW, Magliato HJ (1966) Subtrochanteric fractures. Surg Gynecol Obstet 122:555–560

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. LaVelle DG (2007) Fractures and dislocations of the hip. In: Canal ST, Beaty JH (eds) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics, 11th edn. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 3237–3308

    Google Scholar 

  28. Leung K (2006) Subtrochanteric fractures. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown CM, Tornetta P III (eds) Rockwood and Green's fracture in adults, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1827–1844

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nork SE, Reilly M (2009) Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. In: Browner BD, Jupiter J, Levine AM, Tafton PG, Krettek C (eds) Skeletal trauma: basic science, management, and reconstruction, 4th edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1977–2034

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zuckerman JD (1996) Hip fracture. N Engl J Med 334:1519–1525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Arneson TJ, Melton LJ 3rd, Lewallen DG, O’Fallon WM (1988) Epidemiology of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures in Rochester, Minnesota, 1965–1984. Clin Orthop Relat Res 188–194

  32. Bengner U, Ekbom T, Johnell O, Nilsson BE (1990) Incidence of femoral and tibial shaft fractures. Epidemiology 1950–1983 in Malmo, Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 61:251–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hedlund R, Lindgren U (1986) Epidemiology of diaphyseal femoral fracture. Acta Orthop Scand 57:423–427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wong PC (1966) Fracture epidemiology in a mixed southeastern Asian community (Singapore). Clin Orthop Relat Res 45:55–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mackey DC, Lui LY, Cawthon PM, Bauer DC, Nevitt MC, Cauley JA, Hillier TA, Lewis CE, Barrett-Connor E, Cummings SR (2007) High-trauma fractures and low bone mineral density in older women and men. JAMA 298:2381–2388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zickel RE (1976) An intramedullary fixation device for the proximal part of the femur. Nine years’ experience. J Bone Jt Surg Am 58:866–872

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Abrahamsen B, Eiken P, Eastell R (2009) Subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femur fractures in patients treated with alendronate: a register-based national cohort study. J Bone Miner Res 24:1095–1102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Joel Gonzalez, Ryan Navarro, Ryan Wang, and Rochelle Wang for their technical support of this project.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA

    S. Y. Huang

  2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, CA, USA

    C. D. Grimsrud & J. Provus

  3. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA

    M. Hararah, M. Chandra, B. Ettinger & J. C. Lo

  4. Department of Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, CA, USA

    J. C. Lo

Authors
  1. S. Y. Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. D. Grimsrud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Provus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Hararah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Chandra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. B. Ettinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. C. Lo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. C. Lo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, S.Y., Grimsrud, C.D., Provus, J. et al. The impact of subtrochanteric fracture criteria on hip fracture classification. Osteoporos Int 23, 743–750 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1622-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1622-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation