Osteoporosis International

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 849–858 | Cite as

Targeted intervention reduces refracture rates in patients with incident non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures: a 4-year prospective controlled study

  • A. Lih
  • H. Nandapalan
  • M. Kim
  • C. Yap
  • P. Lee
  • K. Ganda
  • M. J. Seibel
Original Article

Abstract

Summary

In the present prospective controlled observational study, we investigated the effect of a coordinated intervention program on 4-year refracture rates in patients with recent osteoporotic fractures. Compared to standard care, targeted identification, and management significantly reduced the risk of refracture by more than 80%.

Introduction

The risk of refracture following an incident osteoporotic fracture is high. Despite the availability of treatments that reduce refracture and mortality rates, most patients with minimal trauma fracture (MTF) are not managed appropriately. The present prospective controlled observational study investigated the effect of a coordinated intervention program on 4-year refracture rates and time to refracture in patients with recent osteoporotic fractures.

Methods

Patients presenting with a non-vertebral MTF were actively identified and offered referral to a dedicated intervention program. Patients attending the clinic underwent a standardized set of investigations, were treated as indicated and reviewed at 12-monthly intervals (‘MTF group’). Patients who elected to follow-up with their primary care physician were assigned to the concurrent control group.

Results

Groups were balanced for baseline anthropometric, socio-economic, and clinical risk factors. Over 4 years, 10 out of 246 patients (4.1%) in the MTF group and 31 of 157 patients (19.7%) in the control group suffered a new fracture, with a median time to refracture of 26 and 16 months, respectively (p < 0.01). Compared to the intervention group, the risk of refracture was increased by 5.3-fold in the control group (95% CI: 2.8–12.2, p < 0.01), and remained elevated (HR 5.63, 95%CI 2.73–11.6, p < 0.01) after adjustment for other significant predictors of refracture such as age and body weight.

Conclusions

In patients presenting with a minimal trauma non-vertebral fracture, active identification and management significantly reduces the risk of refracture (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN 12606000108516).

Keywords

Fracture Fracture liaison service Intervention Osteoporosis Quality improvement Refracture 

References

  1. 1.
    Johnell O, Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17:1726–1733CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sambrook PN, Seeman E, Phillips SR, Ebeling PR. (2002) Osteoporosis Australia; National Prescribing Service. Preventing osteoporosis: outcomes of the Australian Fracture Prevention Summit. Med J Aust 15 (176): Suppl: S1–16.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    NOF (2002) America's bone health: the state of osteoporosis and low bone mass in our nation.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schneider EL, Guralnik JM (1990) The aging of America. Impact on health care costs. JAMA 263:2335–2340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2000) Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmo. Osteoporos Int 11:669–674CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH et al (2007) Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 22:465–475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keene GS, Parker MJ, Pryor GA (1993) Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures. BMJ 307(6914):1248–1250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bliuc D, Nguyen ND, Milch VE, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Center JR (2009) Mortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women. JAMA 301:513–521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adachi JD, Ioannidis G, Olszynski WP et al (2002) The impact of incident vertebral and non-vertebral fractures on health related quality of life in postmenopausal women. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 3(11):1471–2474Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kado DM, Duong T, Stone KL, Ensrud KE, Nevitt MC, Greendale GA, Cummings SR (2003) Incident vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 14:589–594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnell O, Oden A, Caulin F, Kanis JA (2001) Acute and long-term increase in fracture risk after hospitalization for vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 12(3):207–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C et al (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 285(3):320–323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS, Wasnich RD (1991) Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women. Ann Intern Med 114:919–923PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Black DM, Arden NK, Palermo L et al (1999) Prevalent vertebral deformities predict hip fractures and new vertebral deformities but not wrist fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 14:821–828CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Center JR, Bliuc D, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA (2007) Risk of subsequent fracture after low-trauma fracture in men and women. JAMA 297:387–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kleerekoper M, Gold DT (2008) Osteoporosis prevention and management: an evidence-based review. Clin Obstet Gynecol 51:556–563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bliuc D, Ong CR, Eisman JA, Center JR (2005) Barriers to effective management of osteoporosis in moderate and minimal trauma fractures: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 16:977–982CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Panneman MJ, Lips P, Sen SS, Herings RM (2004) Undertreatment with anti-osteoporotic drugs after hospitalization for fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:120–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Giangregorio L, Papaioannou A, Cranney A, Zytaruk N, Adachi JD (2006) Fragility fractures and the osteoporosis care gap: an international phenomenon. Semin Arthritis Rheum 35:293–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    International Osteoporosis Foundation (2000) How fragile is her future? Available at: http://www.iofbonehealth.org/facts-and-statistics.html. Accessed 15 Aug 2010
  21. 21.
    Rochat S, Cumming RG, Blyth F et al (2010) Frailty use health community services by community dwelling older men Concord Health Ageing Men Proj Age Ageing 39:228–233Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    New South Wales Agency for Clinical Innovation (2009) New South Wales re-fracture admission data 2002–2008. Available at: http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/resources/gmct/musculoskeletal/refracture_data_analysis_2009_pdf.asp. Accessed 15 Aug 2010
  23. 23.
    Premaor MO, Pilbrow L, Tonkin C, Adams M, Parker RA, Compston J (2010) Low rates of treatment in postmeno-pausal women with a history of low trauma fractures: results of audit in a Fracture Liaison Service. QJM 103:33–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Papaioannou A, Kennedy CC, Ioannidis G, CaMos Research Group et al (2008) The osteoporosis care gap in men with fragility fractures: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 19:581–587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vaile J, Sullivan L, Bennett C, Bleasel J (2007) First Fracture Project: addressing the osteoporosis care gap. Intern Med J 37:717–720CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hopman WM, Berger C, Joseph L, CaMos Research Group et al (2009) Health-related quality of life in Canadian adolescents and young adults: normative data using the SF-36. Can J Public Health 100:449–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zethraeus N, Borgstrom F, Strom O, Kanis JA, Jonsson B (2007) Cost-effectiveness of the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis: a review of the literature and a reference model. Osteoporos Int 18:9–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Feldstein A, Elmer PJ, Smith D et al (2006) Electronic medical record reminder improves osteoporosis management after a fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:450–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Harrington JT (2005) Redesigning the care of fragility fracture patients to improve osteoporosis management: a health care improvement project. Arthr Rheum 53(2):198–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chevalley T, Hoffmeyer P, Bonjour JP, Rizzoli R (2002) An osteoporosis clinical pathway for the medical management of patients with low-trauma fracture. Osteoporos Int 13(6):450–455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jaglal S, Cameron C, Hawker G et al (2006) Development of an integrated-care delivery model for post-fracture care in Ontario, Canada. Osteoporos Int 17:1337–1345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hawker G, Ridout R, Ricupero M, Jaglal S, Bogoch E (2003) The impact of a simple fracture clinic intervention in improving the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int 14(2):171–178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bliuc D, Eisman JA, Center JR (2006) A randomized study of two different information-based interventions on the management of osteoporosis in minimal and moderate trauma fractures. Osteoporos Int 17(9):1309–1317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Solomon DH, Polinski JM, Stedman M et al (2007) Improving care of patients at-risk for osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Int Med 22(3):362–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dell R, Greene D, Schelkun SR, Williams K (2008) Osteoporosis disease management: the role of the orthopaedic surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 4:188–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kuo I, Ong C, Simmons L, Bliuc D, Eisman J, Center J (2007) Successful direct intervention for osteoporosis in patients with minimal trauma fractures. Osteoporos Int 18:1633–1639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    McLellan AR, Gallacher SJ, Fraser M, McQuillian C (2003) The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 14(12):1028–1034CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Charalambous CP, Mosey C, Johnstone E et al (2009) Improving osteoporosis assessment in the fracture clinic. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91:596–598CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chong C, Christou J, Fitzpatrick K, Wee R, Lim WK (2008) Description of an orthopedic–geriatric model of care in Australia with 3-year data. Geriatr Gerontol Int 8:86–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Murray AW, McQuillan C, Kennon B, Gallacher SJ (2005) Osteoporosis risk assessment and treatment intervention after hip or shoulder fracture. A comparison of two centres in the United King dom. Injury 36:1080–1084CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Harrington JT, Lease J (2007) Osteoporosis disease management for fragility fracture patients: new understandings based on three years' experience with an osteoporosis care service. Arthritis Rheum 57:1502–1506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bogoch ER, Elliot-Gibson V, Beaton DE, Jamal SA, Josse RG, Murray TM (2006) Effective initiation of osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment for patients with a fragility fracture in an orthopaedic environment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:25–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cauley JA, Lui LY, Ensrud KE et al (2005) Bone mineral density and the risk of incident nonspinal fractures in Black and White women. JAMA 293:2102–2108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cummings S, Nevitt M, Browner W et al (1995) Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. N Engl J Med 332:767–773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2008) Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks. Osteoporos Int 19:1431–1444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Berry SD, Samelson EJ et al (1971) Second hip fracture in older men and women: the Framingham Study. Arch Int Med 167(18):1971–1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Langridge CR, McQuillian C, Watson WS, Walker B, Mitchell L, Gallacher SJ (2007) Refracture following fracture liaison service assessment illustrates the requirement for integrated falls and fracture services. Calc Tissue Intl 81:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hodsman AB, Leslie WD, Tsang JF, Gamble GD (2008) 10-year probability of recurrent fractures following wrist and other osteoporotic fractures in a large clinical cohort. Arch Int Med 168:2261–2267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Johnell O, Kanis JA, Odén A et al (2004) Fracture risk following an osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:175–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Langsetmo LA, Morin S, Richards JB, CaMos Research Group et al (2009) Effectiveness of antiresorptives for theprevention of nonvertebral low-trauma fractures in a population-based cohort of women. Osteoporos Int 20:283–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Siris ES, Harris ST, Rosen CJ et al (2006) Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and non-vertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc 81:1013–1022CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Reid IR, Mason B, Horne A, Ames R et al (2006) Randomized controlled trial of calcium in healthy older women. Am J Med 119(9):775–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Prince RL, Devine A, Dhaliwal SS, Dick IM (2006) Effects of calcium supplementation on clinical fracture and bone structure: results of a 5-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in elderly women. Arch Intern Med 166:869–875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Porthouse J, Cockayne S, King C et al (2005) Randomised controlled trial of calcium and supplementation with cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) for prevention of fractures in primary care. BMJ 330(7498):1003–1006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Lih
    • 1
  • H. Nandapalan
    • 1
  • M. Kim
    • 1
  • C. Yap
    • 1
  • P. Lee
    • 1
  • K. Ganda
    • 1
  • M. J. Seibel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Endocrinology and MetabolismConcord Repatriation General Hospital, and Bone Research Program, ANZAC Research Institute, The University of Sydney at ConcordSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations