Osteoporosis International

, Volume 22, Issue 8, pp 2321–2328 | Cite as

A team approach: implementing a model of care for preventing osteoporosis related fractures

  • M. Giles
  • J. Van Der Kallen
  • V. Parker
  • K. Cooper
  • K. Gill
  • L. Ross
  • S. McNeill
Original Article

Abstract

Summary

The implementation of a multidisciplinary team-based model of care has led to significant increases in identification of patients with osteoporosis who are at risk of refracture, together with improved treatment uptake and ongoing management.

Introduction

Osteoporosis-related fractures and consequent hospital admissions are largely preventable; however, little attention has been paid to how to achieve this, in particular, through improved models of care. Presentation to emergency departments (ED) with minimal trauma fracture (MTF) provides opportunity for patients at risk to be identified, referred and managed through a systematic process ensuring prompt intervention and continuing follow-up. This study is aimed to design and implement a care model for people over 50 years of age, presenting to ED with an MTF.

Method

Established a multidisciplinary fracture prevention team to identify and capture at-risk patients for referral and management. Clinical data revealed the extent of lost opportunities. An electronic flagging system and data acquisition tool were developed and piloted. Established a referral pathway to detect, manage and follow-up patients, coordinated by a fracture prevention nurse.

Results

Increased awareness of osteoporosis as a cause of MTF, better identification of at-risk patients across departments and services and development of a flagging and referral protocol has resulted in 100% capture of at-risk patients presented to ED. As a result there has been a significant increase in patients attending the fracture prevention clinic (FPC) (p < 0.001) from 11% in 2007 to 29% in 2008 and a significantly reduced time between fracture and when patients are seen in the FPC (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

A multipronged systematic team approach to identifying and capturing patients with a high risk of refracture and a dedicated nurse coordinator role has created efficiencies in the detection and management of osteoporosis.

Keywords

Fracture prevention Interprofessional Model of care Osteoporosis 

References

  1. 1.
    Nguyen T, Center J, Eisman J (2004) Osteoporosis: underrated, underdiagnosed and undertreated. Bone Joint Disord 180:S18–S22Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Access Economics (2006) Breaking point. The ecomonic cost of not adhering to bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis, Report for Roche Products Pty Limited & GlaxoSmithKline, November, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dell R, Greene D, Schelkum S, Williams K (2008) Osteoporosis disease management: the role of the orthopaedic surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg 90:188–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Newman E, Ayoub W, Starkey R, Diehl J, Wood G (2003) Osteoporosis disease management in a rural care population: hip fracture reduction and reduced costs in post menopausal women after 5 years. Osteoporos Int 14:146–151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith M, Dunkow P, Lang D (2004) Treatment of osteoporosis: missed opportunity in the hospital fracture clinic. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 86:344–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tosteson A, Burge R, Marshall D, Lindsay R (2008) Therapies for treatment of osteoporosis in US women: cost-effectiveness and budget impact considerations. Am J Manag Care 14:605–615PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne. The burden of brittle bones: epidemiology, costs & burden of osteoporosis in Australia. Sydney: Osteoporosis Australia, 2007. http://www.osteoporosis.org.au. Accessed Mar 2010
  8. 8.
    Parker M, Johanssen A (2006) Hip fracture. BMJ 333:27–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vaile J, Sullivan L, Bennett C, Bleasel J (2007) First fracture project: addressing the osteoporosis care gap. Int Med J 37:717–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huybrechts K, Ishak K, Caro J (2005) Assessment of compliance with osteoporosis treatment and its consequences in a managed care population. Bone 38:922–928PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Giangregorio L, Papaioannou A, Cranney A, Zytaruk N, Adachi J (2006) Fragility fractures and the osteoporosis care gap: an international phenomenon. Semin Arthritis Rheum 35:293–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roerholt C, Eiken P, Abrahamsen B (2009) Initiation of anti-osteoporotic therapy in patients with recent fractures: a nationwide analysis of prescription rates and persistence. Osteoporos Int 20:299–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaufman J, Bolander A, Bunta A, Edwards B, Fitzpatrick L, Simonelli C (2003) Barriers and solutions to osteoporosis care in patients with a hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg 85:1837–1843PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Majumdar S, Kim N, Colman I, Chahal A, Raymond G, Jen H, Simminoski K, Hanley D, Rowe B (2005) Incidental vertebral fractures discovered with chest radiography in the emergency department. Arch Int Med 165:905–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cuddihy M (2003) Barriers to post fracture osteoporosis care in post menopausal women. JGIM 18:70–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Seagger R, Howell J, Huw D, Gregg-Smith S (2004) Prevention of secondary osteoporotic fractures—why are we ignoring the evidence? Injury 35:986–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Freedman K, Kaplan F, Bilker W, Strom B, Lowe R (2000) Treatment of osteoporosis: are physicians missing the opportunity? J Bone Joint Surg 82:1063–1070PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nayak S, Roberts MS, Greenspan SL (2009) Factors associated with diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in older adults. Osteoporos Int 20:1963–1967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wong P, Spencer D, McElduff P, Manolios N, Larcos G, Howe G (2003) Secondary screening for osteoporosis in patients admitted with minimal-trauma fracture to a major teaching hospital. Int Med J 33:505–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cuddihy M, Amadio P, Gabriel S, Pankratz S, Kurland R, Melton L (2004) A prospective clinical practice intervention to improve osteoporosis management following distal forearm fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:695–700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jones G, Warr S, Francis E, Greenway T (2005) The effect of a fracture protocol on hospital prescriptions after minimal trauma fractured neck of femur: a retrospective audit. Osteoporos Int 16:1277–1280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Reeves S. Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. Art. No.:CD000072. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub2
  23. 23.
    Chevalley T, Hoffmeyer P, Bonjour J, Rizzoli R (2002) An osteoporosis clinical pathway for the medical management of patients with low-trauma fracture. Osteoporos Int 13:450–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sidwell A, Wilkinson T, Hanger H (2004) Secondary prevention of fractures in older people: evaluation of a protocol for the investigation and treatment of osteoporosis. Int Med J 34:129–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Klotzbuecher C, Ross P, Landsman P, Abbott T, Berger M (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fracture: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Giles
    • 1
  • J. Van Der Kallen
    • 2
  • V. Parker
    • 1
  • K. Cooper
    • 2
  • K. Gill
    • 2
  • L. Ross
    • 2
  • S. McNeill
    • 2
  1. 1.Level 3, John Hunter HospitalHunter New England Area Health ServiceNewcastleAustralia
  2. 2.Bone and Joint Centre, Royal Newcastle CentreHunter New England Area Health ServiceNewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations