Adherence to osteoporosis drugs and fracture prevention: no evidence of healthy adherer bias in a frail cohort of seniors
- 286 Downloads
We examined new users of osteoporosis drugs among seniors in Pennsylvania and found no evidence of healthy adherer bias on observed associations between adherence to treatment and non-vertebral fracture risk; we document fracture reduction with better adherence to bisphosphonates, yet no fracture reduction with better adherence to calcitonin or raloxifene.
We examined the potential for “healthy adherer bias” when studying the effects of adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy on fracture risk. Based on clinical trial evidence, bisphosphonates, calcitonin, and raloxifene reduce vertebral fracture risk; yet only bisphosphonates are documented to reduce non-vertebral fracture risk.
This is a cohort study of older women in Pennsylvania who initiated osteoporosis drugs between 1995 and 2005. We included new users of bisphosphonates, calcitonin, and raloxifene. Adherence was categorized based on a measure of compliance as high [proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥ 80%], intermediate (50% < PDC < 80%), or low (PDC ≤ 50%) according to a 180-day ascertainment period. Non-vertebral fracture rates within 365 days after the ascertainment period were compared between adherence categories (reference = low) using Cox proportional hazard models and adjusting for fracture risk factors. Primary and secondary prevention cohorts were examined separately. Adherence to calcitonin and raloxifene were control analyses.
We found little difference in fracture rates between levels of adherence to calcitonin, bisphosphonates for primary prevention, or raloxifene for secondary prevention. We document lower fracture rates among high versus low adherent bisphosphonate users for secondary prevention (HR = 0.53, 95%CI = 0.38–0.74) and higher fracture rates among high versus low adherent raloxifene users for primary prevention (HR = 2.01, 95%CI = 1.04–3.87).
We document little evidence of healthy adherer bias when studying the association between better adherence to osteoporosis drugs and fracture risk reduction, with only better adherence to bisphosphonates reducing fracture risk. The higher fracture risk among highly adherent raloxifene users for primary prevention is likely due to residual confounding.
KeywordsBones Fractures Medication adherence Osteoporosis Selection bias
- 7.Imaz I, Zegarra P, Gonzalez-Enriquez J et al. (2010) Poor bisphosphonate adherence for treatment of osteoporosis increases fracture risk: systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. doi:10.1007/s00198-00009-01134-00194
- 10.Curtis J, Larson J, Delzell E et al (2009) Does the benefit of medication adherence relate more to a drug effect or the behavior itself? Quantifying the effect of adherence behavior using data from the placebo arms of the WHI. Arthritis Rheum 60(Suppl 10):613 (abstract)Google Scholar
- 11.American College of Physicians (2008) Information on cost-effectiveness: an essential product of a national comparative effectiveness program. Ann Intern Med 148:956–961Google Scholar
- 13.Janz NK, Champion VL, Strecher VJ (2002) The health belief model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM (eds) Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 45–66Google Scholar
- 18.Cadarette SM, Burden AM (2010) Measuring and improving adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. Curr Opin Rheumatol. doi:10.1097/BOR.0b013e32833ac7fe
- 19.Pols HA, Felsenberg D, Hanley DA et al (1999) Multinational, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of the effects of alendronate on bone density and fracture risk in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: results of the FOSIT Study. Fosamax International Trial Study Group. Osteoporos Int 9:461–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Brookhart MA, Patrick AR, Avorn J et al (2007) Adherence to lipid-lowering therapy and the use of preventive health care services: an investigation of the healthy user effect. Am J Epidemiol 120:251–256Google Scholar
- 28.Sale JEM, Beaton DE, Sujic R et al. (2010) “If it was osteoporosis, I would have really hurt myself.” Ambiguity about osteoporosis and osteoporosis care despite a screening program to educate fragility fracture patients. J Eval Clin Pract 16:590–596Google Scholar
- 30.Miller PD, Derman RJ (2010) What is the best balance of benefits and risks among anti-resorptive therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis? Osteoporos Int. doi:10.1007/s00198-010-1208-3