Osteoporosis International

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 223–230 | Cite as

Nurse case-manager vs multifaceted intervention to improve quality of osteoporosis care after wrist fracture: randomized controlled pilot study

  • S. R. Majumdar
  • J. A. Johnson
  • D. Bellerose
  • F. A. McAlister
  • A. S. Russell
  • D. A. Hanley
  • S. Garg
  • D. A. Lier
  • W. P. Maksymowych
  • D. W. Morrish
  • B. H. Rowe
Original Article

Abstract

Summary

Few outpatients with fractures are treated for osteoporosis in the years following fracture. In a randomized pilot study, we found a nurse case-manager could double rates of osteoporosis testing and treatment compared with a proven efficacious quality improvement strategy directed at patients and physicians (57% vs 28% rates of appropriate care).

Introduction

Few patients with fractures are treated for osteoporosis. An intervention directed at wrist fracture patients (education) and physicians (guidelines, reminders) tripled osteoporosis treatment rates compared to controls (22% vs 7% within 6 months of fracture). More effective strategies are needed.

Methods

We undertook a pilot study that compared a nurse case-manager to the multifaceted intervention using a randomized trial design. The case-manager counseled patients, arranged bone mineral density (BMD) tests, and prescribed treatments. We included controls from our first trial who remained untreated for osteoporosis 1-year post-fracture. Primary outcome was bisphosphonate treatment and secondary outcomes were BMD testing, appropriate care (BMD test-treatment if bone mass low), and costs.

Results

Forty six patients untreated 1-year after wrist fracture were randomized to case-manager (n = 21) or multifaceted intervention (n = 25). Median age was 60 years and 68% were female. Six months post-randomization, 9 (43%) case-managed patients were treated with bisphosphonates compared with 3 (12%) multifaceted intervention patients (relative risk [RR] 3.6, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.1–11.5, p = 0.019). Case-managed patients were more likely than multifaceted intervention patients to undergo BMD tests (81% vs 52%, RR 1.6, 95%CI 1.1–2.4, p = 0.042) and receive appropriate care (57% vs 28%, RR 2.0, 95%CI 1.0–4.2, p = 0.048). Case-management cost was $44 (CDN) per patient vs $12 for the multifaceted intervention.

Conclusions

A nurse case-manager substantially increased rates of appropriate testing and treatment for osteoporosis in patients at high-risk of future fracture when compared with a multifaceted quality improvement intervention aimed at patients and physicians. Even with case-management, nearly half of patients did not receive appropriate care.

Trial Registry

clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00152321

Keywords

Case-manager Fragility fractures Osteoporosis Quality improvement Randomized trial Treatment 

References

  1. 1.
    National Osteoporosis Foundation (2008) Clinicians’ guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. http://www.nof.org/professionals/NOF_Clinicians_Guide.pdf/. Accessed 31 January 2010
  2. 2.
    Scientific Advisory Council, Osteoporosis Society of Canada (2002) clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 167:S1–S34, SupplGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dawson-Hughes B, Tosteson AN, Melton LJ, Baim S, Favus MJ et al (2008) Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the US. Osteoporos Int 19:449–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klotzbeucher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA, Berger M (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Langsetmo L, Goltzman D, Kovacs CS, Adachi JD, Hanley DA, for the CaMos Research Group (2009) J Bone Miner Res 24:1515–1522CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    MacLean C, Newberry S, Maglione M, McMahon M, Ranganath V et al (2008) Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of treatments to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med 148:197–213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eliot-Gibson V, Bogoch ER, Jamal SA, Beaton DE (2004) Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after fragility fracture: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 15:767–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giangregorio L, Papaioannou A, Cranney A, Zytaruk N, Adachi JD (2006) Fragility fractures and the osteoporosis care gap: an international phenomenon. Semin Arthritis Rheum 35:293–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Curtis JR, McClure LA, Delzell E, Howard VJ, Orwoll E et al (2009) Population based fracture risk assessment and osteoporosis treatment disparities by race and gender. J Gen Intern Med 24:956–962CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hawker G, Ridout R, Ricupero M, Jaglal S, Bogoch E (2003) The impact of a simple fracture clinic intervention in improving the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int 14:171–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chevalley T, Hoffmeyer P, Bonjour JP, Rizzoli R (2002) An osteoporosis clinical pathway for the medical management of patients with low trauma fracture. Osteoporos Int 13:450–455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McLellan A, Gallacher SJ, Fraser M, McQuillian C (2003) The fracture liason service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 14:1028–1034CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bogoch ER, Elliot-Gibson V, Beaton DE, Jamal SA, Josse RG, Murray TM (2006) Effective initiation of osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment for patients with a fragility fracture in an orthopedic environment. J Bone Jt Surg 88-A:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Majumdar SR, Rowe BH, Folk D, Johnson JA, Holroyd BR et al (2004) A controlled trial to increase detection and treatment of osteoporosis in older patients with a wrist fracture. Ann Intern Med 141:366–373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Majumdar SR, Johnson JA, McAlister FA, Bellerose D, Russell AS et al (2008) Multifaceted intervention to improve osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment in patients with recent wrist fracture: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 178:569–575PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bliuc D, Eisman JA, Center JR (2006) A randomized study of two different information-based interventions on the management of osteoporosis in minimal and moderate trauma fractures. Osteoporos Int 17:1309–1317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Feldstein A, Elmer PJ, Smith DH, Herson M, Orwoll E et al (2006) Electronic medical record reminder improves osteoporosis management after a fracture: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:450–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rozental TD, Makhni EC, Day CS, Bouxsein ML (2008) Improving evaluation and treatment for osteoporosis following distal radial fractures: prospective randomized intervention. J Bone Jt Surg 90-A:953–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cranney A, Lam M, Ruhland L, Brison R, Godwin M et al (2008) A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment of osteoporosis in post-menopausal women with wrist fractures: a cluster randomized trial. Osteoporos Int 19:1733–1740CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McAlister FA, Stewart S, Ferrua S, McMurray JJ (2004) Multidisciplinary strategies for the management of heart failure patients at high risk for admission: a systematic review of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:810–819PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shojania KG, Ranji SR, McDonald KM, Grimshaw JG, Sundaram V et al (2006) Effects of quality improvement strategies for type-2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis. JAMA 296:427–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Majumdar SR, Beaupre LA, Harley CH, Hanley DA, Lier DA et al (2007) Use of a case-manager to improve osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 167:2110–2115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-item short form health survey (SF-12): construction of scales and preliminary test of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lydick E, Zimmerman SI, Yawn B, Love B, Kleerekoper M et al (1997) Development and validation of a discriminative quality of life questionnaire for osteoporosis (The OPTQoL). J Bone Miner Res 12:456–463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ailinger RL, Harper DC, Lasus HA (1998) Development of the Facts on Osteoporosis Quiz. Orthop Nurs 17:66–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    O’Connor AM, Legare F, Stacey D (2003) Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids. BMJ 327:736–740CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cranney A, O’Connor AM, Jacobsen JM, Tugwell P, Adachi JD et al (2002) Development and pilot testing of a decision aid for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Patient Educ Couns 47:245–255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pencille LJ, Campbell ME, van Houten HK, Shah ND, Mullan RJ et al (2009) Protocol for the Osteoporosis Choice trial: a pilot randomized trial of a decision aid in primary care practice. Trials 10:113–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. R. Majumdar
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. A. Johnson
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. Bellerose
    • 1
    • 3
  • F. A. McAlister
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. S. Russell
    • 1
  • D. A. Hanley
    • 4
  • S. Garg
    • 1
  • D. A. Lier
    • 5
  • W. P. Maksymowych
    • 1
  • D. W. Morrish
    • 1
  • B. H. Rowe
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of MedicineUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.School of Public HealthUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.Department of Emergency MedicineUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  4. 4.Department of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  5. 5.Institute of Health EconomicsEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations