Osteoporosis International

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 179–186 | Cite as

Dose–response effect of 40 weeks of resistance training on bone mineral density in older adults

Original Article

Abstract

Summary

Resistance training is becoming popular for maintaining bone health. Previous studies examined high intensity exercise; we compared high and low intensity resistance training performed 2 or 3 days per week in older adults. We found positive bone density responses for the hip and spine for all types of resistance training.

Introduction

This study determined the dose–response effect of resistance training on lumbar spine, proximal femur, and total body bone mineral density (BMD) in older men and women (55–74 years).

Methods

Subjects included 45 men and 79 women who were assigned to one of the following training groups: 1—high intensity (80% 1RM), 2 days/week (2HI); 2—low intensity (40% 1RM), 2 days/week (2LI); 3—high intensity (80% 1RM), 3 days/week (3HI); and 4—low intensity (40% 1RM), 3 days/week (3LI). Bone scans (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) were performed at baseline and after 40 weeks of training. Muscular strength (1-repetition maximum) was assessed every 5 weeks.

Results

There were significant trial (p < 0.05) effects but no significant trial × training group interactions for the BMD sites. Spine, trochanter, and total hip BMD increased from baseline to 40 weeks; however, the total body BMD site decreased in the 3LI group. Men and women exhibited similar improvements for the trochanter and total hip sites but the percent change in the spine tended (p = 0.054) to be higher for men (1.8%) than women (0.4%).

Conclusions

The resistance training programs, regardless of intensity and frequency, were effective in improving BMD of the proximal femur and lumbar spine but not the total body. Both men and women responded similarly for the hip sites but men show a greater response at the lumbar spine than women.

Keywords

Bone mass Gender Mechanical loading Osteoporosis 

References

  1. 1.
    Burge R, Dawson-Hughs B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A (2007) Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 22:465–475. doi:10.1359/JBMR.061113 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Melton LJ (2003) Adverse outcomes of osteoporotic fractures in the general population. J Bone Miner Res 18:1139–1141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burr DB (1997) Commentary: muscle strength, bone mass, and age-related bone loss. J Bone Miner Res 12:1547–1551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hawkins SA, Wiswell RA, Schroeder ET (2002) The relationship between bone adaptations to resistance exercise and reproductive-hormone levels. JAPA 10:65–75Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kerr D, Morton A, Dick I, Prince R (1996) Exercise effects on bone mass in postmenopausal women are site-specific and load-dependent. J Bone Miner Res 11:218–225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nelson ME, Fiatarone MA, Morganti CM, Trice I, Greenberg RA, Evans WJ (1994) Effects of high-intensity strength training on multiple risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. JAMA 272:1909–1914CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kohrt WM, Snead DB, Slatopolsky E, Birge SJ (1996) Additive effects of weight-bearing exercise and estrogen on bone mineral density in older women. J Bone Miner Res 10:1303–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Menkes A, Mazel S, Redmond RA, Koffler K, Libanati CR, Gundberg CM, Zizic TM, Hagberg JM, Prately RE, Hurley BF (1993) Strength training increases regional bone mineral density and bone remodeling in middle-aged and older men. J Appl Physiol 74:2478–2484PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vincent KR, Braith RW (2002) Resistance exercise and bone turnover in elderly men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:17–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bemben DA, Fetters NL, Bemben MG, Nabavi N, Koh ET (2000) Musculoskeletal responses to high- and low-intensity resistance training in early postmenopausal women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:1949–1957CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pruitt LA, Taaffe DR, Marcus R (1995) Effects of a one-year high-intensity versus low-intensity resistance program on bone mineral density in older women. J Bone Miner Res 10:1788–1795CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rubin CT, Lanyon LE (1985) Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude. Calcif Tissue Int 37:411–417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cussler EC, Lohman TG, Going SB, Houtkooper LB, Metcalfe LL, Flint-Wagner HG, Harris RB, Teixeira PJ (2003) Weight lifted in strength training predicts bone change in postmenopausal women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:10–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baim S, Binkley N, Bilezikian JP, Kendler DL, Hans DB, Lewiecki EM, Silverman S (2008) Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of the 2007 ISCD position development conference. J Clin Densitom 11:75–91. doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.2007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Musgrave KO, Giambalvo L, Leclerc HL, Cook RA (1989) Validation of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire for rapid assessment of dietary calcium intake. J Am Diet Assoc 89:1484–1488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    NIH Consensus Conference (1994) Optimal calcium intake. JAMA 272:1942–1948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maddalozzo GF, Snow CM (2000) High intensity resistance training: effects on bone in older men and women. Calcif Tissue Int 66:399–404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maddalozzo G, Widrick JJ, Cardinal BJ, Winters-Stone KM, Hoffman MA, Snow CM (2007) The effects of hormone replacement therapy and resistance training on spine bone mineral density in early postmenopausal women. Bone 40:1244–1251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Turner CH, Robling AG (2003) Designing exercise regimens to increase bone strength. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 31:45–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lanyon L, Skerry T (2001) Postmenopausal osteoporosis as a failure of bone’s adaptation to functional loading: a hypothesis. J Bone Miner Res 16:1937–1947CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Riggs BL, Khosla S, Melton LJ III (1998) A unitary model for involutional osteoporosis: estrogen deficiency causes both type I and type II osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and contributes to bone loss in aging men. J Bone Miner Res 13:763–773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Damien E, Price JS, Lanyon LE (1998) The estrogen receptor’s involvement in osteoblasts’ adaptive response to mechanical strain. J Bone Miner Res 13:1275–1282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nieves JW, Komar L, Cosman F, Lindsay R (1998) Calcium potentiates the effects of estrogen and calcitonin on bone mass: review and analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 67:18–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Going S, Lohman T, Houtkooper L, Metcalfe L, Flint-Wagner H, Blew R, Stanford V, Cussler E, Martin J, Teixeira P, Harris M, Milliken L, Figueroa-Galvez A, Weber J (2003) Effects of exercise on bone mineral density in calcium-replete postmenopausal women with and without hormone replacement therapy. Osteoporos Int 14:637–643. doi:10.1007/s00198-003-1436-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Turner CH (1998) Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli. Bone 23:399–407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Von Stengal SV, Kemmler W, Pintag R, Beeskow C, Weineck J, Lauber D, Kalender WA, Engelke K (2005) Power training is more effective than strength training for maintaining bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. J Appl Physiol 99:181–188. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01260.2004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Von Stengal S, Kemmler W, Lauber D, Kalender WA, Engelke K (2007) Differential effects of strength versus power training on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a 2-year longitudinal study. Br J Sports Med 41:649–655. doi:10.1136/bjsp.2006.033480 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bone Density Research Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise ScienceUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations