Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors predicting osteoporosis treatment initiation in a regionally based cohort

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Osteoporosis treatment initiation was assessed during the year after baseline BMD testing in 8,689 previously untreated women. Treatment initiation increased progressively as BMD T-scores decreased, but there was a gradient response rather than step increases at conventional T-score intervention thresholds.

Introduction

Bone mineral density (BMD) testing is used to identify those at high fracture risk and guide osteoporosis treatment (OTx) initiation. Clinical guidelines have used the World Health Organization T-score diagnostic cutoffs as thresholds for treatment intervention. Our objective was to assess whether OTx initiation tracks these T-score cutoffs.

Methods

Eight thousand six hundred and eighty-nine women age ≥50 years who had not been dispensed any OTx medication in the year prior to baseline BMD were identified from a regionally based database in the Province of Manitoba, Canada, and OTx initiation rates were analyzed.

Results

Forty-four percent of women were dispensed OTx in the year after BMD. OTx initiation increased progressively as BMD T-scores decreased (8.2% normal, 41.0% osteopenic, 78.5% osteoporotic, p-for-trend < 0.0001). There was a gradient response to OTx initiation, rather than step increases at conventional T-score intervention thresholds. BMD was strongly associated with OTx (p < 0.0001) while age, weight, and fracture in the last year were not.

Conclusions

Physicians rely heavily on BMD T-score to decide on OTx initiation. Although guidelines suggest using clinical risk factors to guide decision making, we did not see evidence of this. More explicit methods of reporting fracture risk may help physicians select patients who are likely to derive the largest benefit from OTx.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312(7041):1254–1259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization (WHO Study Group) Report (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser843:1–129

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown JP, Josse RG (2002) clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 167(10 Suppl):S1–S34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. National Osteoporosis Foundation Report (2003) Physicians guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Excerpta Medica, Belle Mead

    Google Scholar 

  5. Black DM, Thompson DE, Bauer DC et al (2000) Fracture risk reduction with alendronate in women with osteoporosis: the Fracture Intervention Trial. FIT Research Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85(11):4118–4124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Siris ES, Simon JA, Barton IP et al (2008) Effects of risedronate on fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteopenia. Osteoporos Int 19(5):681–686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Black DM et al (2003) Effect of raloxifene on the risk of new vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis: a reanalysis of the multiple outcomes of raloxifene evaluation trial. Bone 33(3):293–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leslie WD, Metge C (2006) Establishing a regional bone density program: lessons from the Manitoba experience. J Clin Densitom 6(3):275–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leslie WD, Caetano PA, MacWilliam LR et al (2005) Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database. J Clin Densitom 8(1):25–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Binkley N, Kiebzak GM, Lewiecki EM et al (2005) Recalculation of the NHANES database SD improves T-score agreement and reduces osteoporosis prevalence. J Bone Miner Res 20(2):195–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stone KL, Seeley DG, Lui LY et al (2003) BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 18(11):1947–1954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Black DM, Steinbuch M, Palermo L et al (2001) An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 12(7):519–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A et al (2005) Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 20(7):1185–1194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Siris ES, Brenneman SK, Barrett-Connor E et al (2006) The effect of age and bone mineral density on the absolute, excess, and relative risk of fracture in postmenopausal women aged 50–99: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA). Osteoporos Int 17(4):565–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, De Laet C et al (2005) Assessment of fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 16(6):581–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leslie WD, Metge C, Ward L (2003) Contribution of clinical risk factors to bone density-based absolute fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 14(4):334–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Siminoski K, Leslie WD, Frame H et al (2005) Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada. Can Assoc Radiol J 56(3):178–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2008) FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19(4):385–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H et al (2008) Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX((R))—assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK. Osteoporos Int 19(10):1395–1408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Leslie WD (2008) Absolute fracture risk reporting in clinical practice: a physician-centered survey. Osteoporos Int 19(4):459–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Manitoba Health and Healthy Living for providing data (File No. 2007/2008-33), Charles Burchill for assistance with data extraction, and Drs. Patricia Caetano and Lisa Lix for advice on the analysis. The results and conclusions are those of the authors, and no official endorsement by Manitoba Health and Healthy Living is intended or should be inferred. This article has been reviewed and approved by the members of the Manitoba Bone Density Program Committee.

Funding

Funded in part by an unrestricted educational grant from the CHAR/GE Healthcare Development Awards Programme

Conflicts of interest

William D. Leslie: In the past 5 years W.D.L. has received speaker fees, research honoraria, and unrestricted research grants from Merck Frosst Canada Ltd.; research honoraria and unrestricted educational grants from The Alliance for Better Bone Health: Sanofi-Aventis and Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals Canada, Inc.; unrestricted research grants from Amgen Pharmaceuticals Canada, Inc.; unrestricted educational grants from Genzyme Canada.

All other authors have no disclosures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. D. Leslie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cranney, A., Tsang, J.F. & Leslie, W.D. Factors predicting osteoporosis treatment initiation in a regionally based cohort. Osteoporos Int 20, 1621–1625 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0823-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0823-8

Keywords

Navigation