Osteoporosis International

, Volume 20, Issue 7, pp 1117–1129 | Cite as

The health and economic consequences of osteopenia- and osteoporosis-attributable hip fractures in Germany: estimation for 2002 and projection until 2050

Original Article

Abstract

Summary

The health and economic burden of osteopenia- and osteoporosis-attributable hip fractures (OHF) in Germany was estimated for 2002 and projected until 2050. We found 108,341 OHF resulting in 2,998 million Euros cost, which will more than double by the year 2050, calling for improvement and development of prevention strategies for OHF.

Introduction

This study aimed to estimate the health impact and the societal costs of OHF in Germany in the year 2002 and to extrapolate these estimates to the years 2020 and 2050.

Methods

We estimated OHF-attributable deaths, years of potential life lost (YPLL) and quality-adjusted life years lost (QALYs) using attributable fractions. Direct costs for acute treatment, rehabilitation, nursing care, non-medical costs and indirect costs for sickness absence, early retirement and mortality were estimated. All estimates were extrapolated to 2020 and 2050 using an estimation of future population composition and life expectancy.

Results

We found 108,341 OHF resulting in 3,485 deaths, 22,724 YPLL, 114,058 QALYs, 2,736 millions of Euros direct cost and 262 millions of Euros indirect costs. Projection to 2020 showed corresponding increases of 44%, 62%, 56%, 49%, 47% and 33%, whereas the projection to 2050 resulted in changes of 128%, 215%, 196%, 152%, 138% and 90%, respectively.

Conclusions

OHF have considerable impact on health and direct costs in the elderly. Both may strongly increase in future decades due to demographic changes, calling for improvement and development of effective strategies for preventing and dealing with OHF.

Keywords

Costs Demographic Fracture Hip Osteopenia Osteoporosis Projection 

References

  1. 1.
    Cooper C (1999) Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 9(Suppl 2):S2–S8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    WHO Scientific Group on the Prevention and Management of Osteoporosis (2003) Prevention and management of osteoporosis: report of a WHO scientific group. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Statistisches Bundesamt (2006) Bevölkerung Deutschlands bis 2050. Ergebnisse der 11. koordinierten Bevölkerungsvorausberechnung [Population in Germany up to the year 2050. Results of the 11th coordinated projection of population]. Statistisches Bundesamt, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sanders KM, Nicholson GC, Ugoni AM, Pasco JA, Seeman E, Kotowicz MA (1999) Health burden of hip and other fractures in Australia beyond 2000. Projections based on the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Med J Aust 170:467–470PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H (1982) Epidemiologic research, principles and quantitative methods. Van Nostrand Reinold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wildner M (2000) Osteoporose. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 126:A1170–A1172Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Laet CE, Van Hout BA, Burger H, Weel AE, Hofman A, Pols HA (1998) Hip fracture prediction in elderly men and women: validation in the Rotterdam study. J Bone Miner Res 13:1587–1593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Statistisches Bundesamt (2004) Fachserie 12 Reihe 4, Todesursachen in Deutschland 2002 [Causes of death in Germany 2002, series 12(4)]. Statistisches Bundesamt, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Statistisches Bundesamt (2004) Statistisches Jahrbuch 2004 [Statistical yearbook 2004]. Statistisches Bundesamt, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Statistisches Bundesamt (2002) Tiefgegliederte Diagnosedaten der Krankenhauspatientinnen und -patienten 2002 [Deep stratified diagnosis data from female and male inpatients 2002]. Statistisches Bundesamt, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Statistisches Bundesamt (2005) Fachserie 12 Reihe 6.3, Kostennachweis der Krankenäuser 2002 [Hospital cost documentation 2002, series 12(6.3)]. Statistisches Bundesamt, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Statistisches Bundesamt (2006) Fachserie 12, Reihe 6.2.2, Diagnosedaten der Rehabilitationspatienten 2004 [Diagnoses of patients in rehabilitation units 2004]. Statistisches Bundesamt, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Statistisches Bundesamt (2002) Krankheitskostenrechnung [Calculation of costs of illness]. Accessed 26 March 2005. www.gbe-bund.de
  14. 14.
    Osnes EK, Lofthus CM, Meyer HE et al (2004) Consequences of hip fracture on activities of daily life and residential needs. Osteoporos Int 15:567–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Statistisches Bundesamt (2005) Bericht: Pflegestatistik 2003—Pflege im Rahmen der Pflegeversicherung—Deutschlandergebnisse [Statistics on care 2003—care in the context of the care insurance—results for Germany]. Statistisches Bundesamt, BonnGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Statistisches Bundesamt (2004) Gesundheit, Ausgaben 2002 [Health, expenditures 2002]. Statistisches Bundesamt, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Statistisches Bundesamt (2004) Fachserie 16 Heft 1, Löhne und Gehälter, Gehalts- und Lohnstrukturerhebung 2001 [Wages and salaries, survey about wages and salaries 2001, Series 16(1)]. Statistisches Bundesamt, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Statistisches Bundesamt (2003) Löhne und Gehälter, Arbeitskostenerhebung, Ergebnisse der Arbeitskostenerhebung 2000 für Deutschland [Wages and salaries, survey about labour costs, results of the survey about labour costs for Germany in 2000]. Statistisches Bundesamt, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Statistisches Bundesamt (2003) Statistisches Jahrbuch 2003 [Statistical yearbook 2003]. Statistisches Bundesamt, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Statistisches Bundesamt (2004) Forum der Bundesstatistik Band 43. Alltag in Deutschland, Analysen zur Zeitverwendung. [Forum of federal statistics series 43, everyday life in Germany, analysis of time use]. Statistisches Bundesamt, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    BKK Bundesverband (2003) Gesundheit und Arbeitswelt, BKK Gesundheitsreport 2003 [Health and work environment, BKK health report 2003]. BKK Bundesverband, EssenGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Verband deutscher Rentenversicherungsträger VDR (2002) Rentenzugang des Jahres 2002, Band 145. [Statistics about new pensions in 2002, volume 145]. VDR, Frankfurt/MainGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brazier JE, Green C, Kanis JA (2002) A systematic review of health state utility values for osteoporosis-related conditions. Osteoporos Int 13:768–776PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hiligsmann M, Ethgen O, Richy F, Reginster JY (2008) Utility values associated with osteoporotic fracture: a systematic review of the literature. Calcif Tissue Int 82:288–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dolan P (1997) Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35:1095–1108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    König HH, Bernert S, Angermeyer MC (2005) Health Status of the German population: results of a representative survey using the EuroQol questionnaire. Gesundheitswesen 67:173–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A et al (2005) Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 20:1185–1194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Häussler B, Gothe H, Gol D, Glaeske G, Pientka L, Felsenberg D (2007) Epidemiology, treatment and costs of osteoporosis in Germany—the BoneEVA Study. Osteoporos Int 18:77–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A (2007) Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res 22:465–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Borgström F, Sobocki P, Strom O, Jonsson B (2007) The societal burden of osteoporosis in Sweden. Bone 40:1602–1609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schwenkglenks M, Lippuner K, Hauselmann HJ, Szucs TD (2005) A model of osteoporosis impact in Switzerland 2000–2020. Osteoporos Int 16:659–671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Health Economics Research Unit, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations