Generation of a 3D proximal femur shape from a single projection 2D radiographic image
- 240 Downloads
Generalized Procrustes analysis and thin plate splines were employed to create an average 3D shape template of the proximal femur that was warped to the size and shape of a single 2D radiographic image of a subject. Mean absolute depth errors are comparable with previous approaches utilising multiple 2D input projections.
Several approaches have been adopted to derive volumetric density (g cm-3) from a conventional 2D representation of areal bone mineral density (BMD, g cm-2). Such approaches have generally aimed at deriving an average depth across the areal projection rather than creating a formal 3D shape of the bone.
Generalized Procrustes analysis and thin plate splines were employed to create an average 3D shape template of the proximal femur that was subsequently warped to suit the size and shape of a single 2D radiographic image of a subject. CT scans of excised human femora, 18 and 24 scanned at pixel resolutions of 1.08 mm and 0.674 mm, respectively, were equally split into training (created 3D shape template) and test cohorts.
The mean absolute depth errors of 3.4 mm and 1.73 mm, respectively, for the two CT pixel sizes are comparable with previous approaches based upon multiple 2D input projections.
This technique has the potential to derive volumetric density from BMD and to facilitate 3D finite element analysis for prediction of the mechanical integrity of the proximal femur. It may further be applied to other anatomical bone sites such as the distal radius and lumbar spine.
KeywordsGeometric morphometrics Proximal femur Three-dimensional shape Volumetric density
- 11.Caponetti l, Fanelli AM (1990) 3D bone reconstruction from two x-ray views. In Proc IEEE Conf Eng in Medicine and Biology, pp 208–210Google Scholar
- 12.Nikkhade-Dehkordi B, Bro-Nielsen M, Darvann T, Gramkow C, Egund N, Hermann K (1996) 3D reconstruction of the femoral bone using two x-ray images from orthogonal views. In Proc. Computer Assisted Radiology (CAR’96), pp 1015, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
- 13.Foley JD, Dam AV, Feiner SK, Hughes JF (1990) Computer graphics: principles and practice, 2nd edn. Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
- 17.Zheng G, Ballester M, Styner M, Nolte L (2006). Reconstruction of patient-specific 3D bone surface from 2D calibrated fluoroscopic images and point distribution model. In Proc International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp 25–32. Springer Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
- 20.Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL (2004) Geometric morphometrics for biologists -a primer. Elsevier Academic PressGoogle Scholar
- 21.Rohlf FJ (1990) Rotational fit (procrustes) methods. In: Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL (eds) (1990) Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop, number 2, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
- 23.Manly BFJ (2000) Multivariate statistical methods, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRCGoogle Scholar