Osteoporosis International

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 61–70 | Cite as

Anterior–posterior bending strength at the tibial shaft increases with physical activity in boys: evidence for non-uniform geometric adaptation

  • H. M. Macdonald
  • D. M. L. Cooper
  • H. A. McKay
Original Article



We investigated bone structural adaptations to a 16-month school-based physical activity intervention in 202 young boys using a novel analytical method for peripheral quantitative computed tomography scans of the tibial mid-shaft. Our intervention effectively increased bone bending strength in the anterior–posterior plane as estimated with the maximum second moment of area (Imax).


We previously reported positive effects of a physical activity intervention on peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT)-derived bone strength at the tibial mid-shaft in young boys. The present study further explored structural adaptations to the intervention using a novel method for pQCT analysis.


Participants were 202 boys (aged 9–11 years) from 10 schools randomly assigned to control (CON, 63 boys) and intervention (INT, 139 boys) groups. INT boys participated in 60 min/week of classroom physical activity, including a bone-loading program. We used ImageJ to process pQCT images of the tibial mid-shaft and determine the second moments of area (Imax, Imin) and cortical area (CoA) and thickness (CTh) by quadrant (anterior, medial, lateral, posterior). We defined quadrants according to pixel coordinates about the centroid. We used mixed linear models to compare change in bone outcomes between groups.


The INT boys had a 3% greater gain in Imax than the CON boys (p = 0.04) and tended to have a greater gain in Imin (∼2%, NS). Associated with the greater gain in Imax was a slightly greater (NS) gain (1–1.4%) in CoA and CTh in the anterior, medial, and posterior (but not lateral) quadrants.


Our results suggest regional variation in bone adaptation consistent with patterns of bone formation induced by anterior–posterior bending loads.


Bone Children Peripheral QCT Physical activity 


  1. 1.
    Kannus P, Haapasalo H, Sankelo M et al (1995) Effect of starting age of physical activity on bone mass in the dominant arm of tennis and squash players. Ann Intern Med 123:27–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Turner CH, Takano Y, Owan I (1995) Aging changes mechanical loading thresholds for bone formation in rats. J Bone Miner Res 10:1544–1549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lieberman DE, Polk JD, Demes B (2004) Predicting long bone loading from cross-sectional geometry. Am J Phys Anthropol 123:156–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wainright SA, Biggs WD, Currey JD, Gosline JM (1976) Mechanical design in organisms. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peterman MM, Hamel AJ, Cavanagh PR, Piazza SJ, Sharkey NA (2001) In vitro modeling of human tibial strains during exercise in micro-gravity. J Biomech 34:693–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rubin CT, Lanyon LE (1982) Limb mechanics as a function of speed and gait: a study of functional strains in the radius and tibia of horse and dog. J Exp Biol 101:187–211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ruff CB, Hayes WC (1983) Cross-sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae—a biomechanical investigation. I. Method and general patterns of variation. Am J Phys Anthropol 60:359–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lovejoy CO, Burstein AH, Heiple KG (1976) The biomechanical analysis of bone strength: a method and its application to platycnemia. Am J Phys Anthropol 44:489–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Demes B (2007) In vivo bone strain and bone functional adaptation. Am J Phys Anthropol 133:717–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Robling AG, Hinant FM, Burr DB, Turner CH (2002) Improved bone structure and strength after long-term mechanical loading is greatest if loading is separated into short bouts. J Bone Miner Res 17:1545–1554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brown TD, Pedersen DR, Gray ML, Brand RA, Rubin CT (1990) Toward an identification of mechanical parameters initiating periosteal remodeling: a combined experimental and analytic approach. J Biomech 23:893–905PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Warden SJ, Hurst JA, Sanders MS, Turner CH, Burr DB, Li J (2005) Bone adaptation to a mechanical loading program significantly increases skeletal fatigue resistance. J Bone Miner Res 20:809–816PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Torrance AG, Mosley JR, Suswillo RF, Lanyon LE (1994) Noninvasive loading of the rat ulna in vivo induces a strain-related modeling response uncomplicated by trauma or periosteal pressure. Calcif Tissue Int 54:241–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mosley JR, March BM, Lynch J, Lanyon LE (1997) Strain magnitude related changes in whole bone architecture in growing rats. Bone 20:191–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vainionpaa A, Korpelainen R, Sievanen H, Vihriala E, Leppaluoto J, Jamsa T (2007) Effect of impact exercise and its intensity on bone geometry at weight-bearing tibia and femur. Bone 40:604–611PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nonaka K, Fukuda S, Aoki K, Yoshida T, Ohya K (2006) Regional distinctions in cortical bone mineral density measured by pQCT can predict alterations in material property at the tibial diaphysis of the Cynomolgus monkey. Bone 38:265–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lai YM, Qin L, Hung VW, Chan KM (2005) Regional differences in cortical bone mineral density in the weight-bearing long bone shaft—a pQCT study. Bone 36:465–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lai YM, Qin L, Hung VW et al (2006) Trabecular bone status in ultradistal tibia under habitual gait loading: a pQCT study in postmenopausal women. J Clin Densitom 9:175–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Macdonald HM, Kontulainen SA, Khan KM, McKay HA (2007) Is a school-based physical activity intervention effective for increasing tibial bone strength in boys and girls? J Bone Miner Res 22:434–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Macdonald H, Kontulainen S, Petit M, Janssen P, McKay H (2006) Bone strength and its determinants in pre- and early pubertal boys and girls. Bone 39:598–608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Naylor P, Macdonald HM, Reed KE, McKay HA (2006) Action Schools! BC: a socio-ecological approach to modifying chronic disease risk factors in elementary school children. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online]. Available at: http://wwwcdcgov/pcd/issues/2006/apr/05_0090htm. Accessed 20 May 2006
  22. 22.
    Naylor PJ, Macdonald HM, Zebedee JA, Reed KE, McKay HA (2006) Lessons learned from Action Schools! BC-An ‘active school’ model to promote physical activity in elementary schools. J Sci Med Sport 9:413–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McKay HA, MacLean L, Petit M et al (2005) “Bounce at the Bell”: a novel program of short bouts of exercise improves proximal femur bone mass in early pubertal children. Br J Sports Med 39:521–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Medalia AI (1970) Dynamic shape factors of particles. Powder Tech 4:117–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mirwald RL, Baxter-Jones AD, Bailey DA, Beunen GP (2002) An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:689–694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tanner JM (1978) Foetus into man. Harvard Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Crocker PR, Bailey DA, Faulkner RA, Kowalski KC, McGrath R (1997) Measuring general levels of physical activity: preliminary evidence for the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:1344–1349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kowalski KC, Crocker PR, Faulkner RA (1997) Validation of the physical activity questionnaire for older children. Pediatr Exerc Sci 9:174–186Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Barr SI (1994) Associations of social and demographic variables with calcium intakes of high school students. J Am Diet Assoc 94:260–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kerry SM, Bland JM (1998) The intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomisation. BMJ 316:1455PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lieberman DE, Devlin MJ, Pearson OM (2001) Articular area responses to mechanical loading: effects of exercise, age, and skeletal location. Am J Phys Anthropol 116:266–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Robling AG, Hinant FM, Burr DB, Turner CH (2002) Shorter, more frequent mechanical loading sessions enhance bone mass. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:196–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Warden SJ, Fuchs RK, Castillo AB, Nelson IR, Turner CH (2007) Exercise when young provides lifelong benefits to bone structure and strength. J Bone Miner Res 22:251–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Khan K, McKay HA, Haapasalo H et al (2000) Does childhood and adolescence provide a unique opportunity for exercise to strengthen the skeleton? J Sci Med Sport 3:150–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Robling AG, Burr DB, Turner CH (2000) Partitioning a daily mechanical stimulus into discrete loading bouts improves the osteogenic response to loading. J Bone Miner Res 15:1596–1602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hind K, Burrows M (2007) Weight-bearing exercise and bone mineral accrual in children and adolescents: a review of controlled trials. Bone 40:14–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Demes B, Qin YX, Stern JT Jr, Larson SG, Rubin CT (2001) Patterns of strain in the macaque tibia during functional activity. Am J Phys Anthropol 116:257–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. M. Macdonald
    • 1
  • D. M. L. Cooper
    • 2
  • H. A. McKay
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing EngineeringUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Department of Anatomy and Cell BiologyUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada
  3. 3.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  4. 4.UBC Department of Orthopaedics, Centre for Hip Health and Musculoskeletal ResearchVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations