Osteoporosis International

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 123–132 | Cite as

Shortcomings of DXA to assess changes in bone tissue density and microstructure induced by metabolic bone diseases in rat models

Original Article

Abstract

Summary

The aim of this study is to demonstrate the deficiencies of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), compared with quantitative computed tomography, to reflect and differentiate between changes in bone mineral density and microstructure that contribute to a well-defined finding of altered skeletal state for both osteoporosis and renal osteodystrophy induced by chronic renal insufficiency.

Introduction

The aim of this study is to demonstrate the deficiencies of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), compared with quantitative CT, to reflect and differentiate between changes in bone mineral density and microstructure that contribute to a well-defined finding of altered skeletal state for both osteoporosis and renal osteodystrophy induced by chronic renal insufficiency.

Methods

Forty-five female Sprague–Dawley rats were divided into three equal groups: control, ovariectomy, and nephrectomy. Following euthanasia, femurs were excised, divided into diaphyseal and distal metaphyseal sections, and subjected to DXA and micro-CT imaging and mechanical testing.

Results

Ovariectomy does not affect the structural and mechanical properties of cortical bone material, but partial nephrectomy does adversely affect these properties. Both are verified by DXA and micro-CT imaging and mechanical testing. Meanwhile, nephrectomy does not affect trabecular bone microstructure or equivalent density, yet ovariectomy affects the trabecular microstructure. DXA is unable to detect changes in trabecular bone microstructure in relation to changes in their mechanical properties.

Discussion

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measures the average bone mineral content in a 2D projected area and cannot differentiate whether the changes occur in the bone microstructure or equivalent bone tissue density. In contrast, micro-CT provides an accurate measurement of the changes in both equivalent bone tissue mineral density and microstructure for cancellous and cortical bone.

Keywords

Animal model Bone density Bone tissue properties DXA Micro-CT Microstructure Osteomalacia Osteopenia Osteoporosis Renal osteodystrophy 

References

  1. 1.
    Riggs BL, Melton LJ III (1995) The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone 17:505S–511SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chrischilles EA, Butler CD, Davis CS, Wallace RB (1991) A model of lifetime osteoporosis impact. Arch Intern Med 151:2026–2032PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roche JJ, Wenn RT, Sahota O, Moran CG (2005) Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ 331:1374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Consensus Development Conference (1993) Diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 94:646–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schuit SC, van der Klift M, Weel AE et al (2004) Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. Bone 34:195–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Harris F et al (2002) Improvement in spine bone density and reduction in risk of vertebral fractures during treatment with antiresorptive drugs. Am J Med 112:281–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heaney RP (2003) Is the paradigm shifting? Bone 33:457–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bauer DC, Black DM, Garnero P et al (2004) Change in bone turnover and hip, non-spine, and vertebral fracture in alendronate-treated women: the Fracture Intervention Trial. J Bone Miner Res 19:1250–1258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Riggs BL, Melton LJ III (2002) Bone turnover matters: the raloxifene treatment paradox of dramatic decreases in vertebral fractures without commensurate increases in bone density. J Bone Miner Res 17:11–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hayes WC, Bouxsein ML (1997) Biomechanics of cortical and trabecular bone: implication for assessment of fracture risk. In: Mow VC, Hayes WC (eds) Basic orthopaedic biomechanics. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 69–112Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rice JC, Cowin SC, Bowman JA (1988) On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J Biomech 21:155–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Snyder SM, Schneider E (1991) Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography. J Orthop Res 9:422–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Favus MJ (ed) (2006) Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism. American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    LeBoff MS, Kohlmeier L, Hurwitz S, Franklin J, Wright J, Glowacki J (1999) Occult vitamin D deficiency in postmenopausal US women with acute hip fracture. JAMA 281:1505–1511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Glowacki J, Hurwitz S, Thornhill TS, Kelly M, LeBoff MS (2003) Osteoporosis and vitamin-D deficiency among postmenopausal women with osteoarthritis undergoing total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:2371–2377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aaron J, Gallagher JC, Nordin BE (1974) Osteomalacia [letter]. Lancet 1:939PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aaron J, Gallagher JC, Nordin BE (1974) Osteomalacia and femoral fractures [letter]. Lancet 1:572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chalmers J, Barclay A, Davison AM, Macleod DA, Williams DA (1969) Quantitative measurements of osteoid in health and disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 63:196–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sokoloff L (1978) Occult osteomalacia in American (U.S.A.) patients with fracture of the hip. Am J Surg Pathol 2:21–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lips P, Netelenbos JC, Jongen MJ et al (1982) Histomorphometric profile and vitamin D status in patients with femoral neck fracture. Metab Bone Dis Relat Res 4:85–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kanis JA, Melton LJ III, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:1137–1141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Miller SC, Wronski TJ (1993) Long-term osteopenic changes in cancellous bone structure in ovariectomized rats. Anat Rec 236:433–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reddy Nagareddy P, Lakshmana M (2005) Assessment of experimental osteoporosis using CT-scanning, quantitative X-ray analysis and impact test in calcium deficient ovariectomized rats. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 52:350–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yao W, Hadi T, Jiang Y, Lotz J, Wronski TJ, Lane NE (2005) Basic fibroblast growth factor improves trabecular bone connectivity and bone strength in the lumbar vertebral body of osteopenic rats. Osteoporos Int 16:1939–1947PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ito M, Nishida A, Aoyagi K, Uetani M, Hayashi K, Kawase M (2005) Effects of risedronate on trabecular microstructure and biomechanical properties in ovariectomized rat tibia. Osteoporos Int 16:1042–1048PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hornby SB, Evans GP, Hornby SL, Pataki A, Glatt M, Green JR (2003) Long-term zoledronic acid treatment increases bone structure and mechanical strength of long bones of ovariectomized adult rats. Calcif Tissue Int 72:519–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ogawa K, Hori M, Takao R, Sakurada T (2005) Effects of combined elcatonin and alendronate treatment on the architecture and strength of bone in ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Metab 23:351–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kaczmarczyk-Sedlak I, Janiec W, Pytlik M et al (2005) Effect of administration of etidronate and retinol on bone mechanical properties in ovariectomized rats. Pharmacol Rep 57:203–211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Guo XE, Goldstein SA (2000) Vertebral trabecular bone microscopic tissue elastic modulus and hardness do not change in ovariectomized rats. J Orthop Res 18:333–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang L, Orhii PB, Banu J, Kalu DN (2001) Effects of separate and combined therapy with growth hormone and parathyroid hormone on lumbar vertebral bone in aged ovariectomized osteopenic rats. Bone 28:202–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Feng JQ, Ward LM, Liu S et al (2006) Loss of DMP1 causes rickets and osteomalacia and identifies a role for osteocytes in mineral metabolism. Nat Genet 38:1310–1315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Turner CH, Owan I, Brizendine EJ, Zhang W, Wilson ME, Dunipace AJ (1996) High fluoride intakes cause osteomalacia and diminished bone strength in rats with renal deficiency. Bone 19:595–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jokihaara J, Jarvinen TL, Jolma P et al (2006) Renal insufficiency-induced bone loss is associated with an increase in bone size and preservation of strength in rat proximal femur. Bone 39:353–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Miller MA, Chin J, Miller SC, Fox J (1998) Disparate effects of mild, moderate, and severe secondary hyperparathyroidism on cancellous and cortical bone in rats with chronic renal insufficiency. Bone 23:257–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kazama JJ, Iwasaki Y, Yamato H et al (2003) Microfocus computed tomography analysis of early changes in bone microstructure in rats with chronic renal failure. Nephron 95:e152–e157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brkovic D, Linke J, Jakse G, Bauss F (2005) Changes in bone structure after augmentation cystoplasty in chronic uraemic rats. BJU Int 95:1066–1070PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Freesmeyer MG, Abendroth K, Faldum A, Krauss C, Stein G (2001) Comparison of peripheral bone and body axis skeleton in a rat model of mild-to-moderate renal failure in the presence of physiological serum levels of calcitropic hormones. Bone 29:258–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Melhus G, Solberg LB, Dimmen S, Madsen JE, Nordsletten L, Reinholt FP (2007) Experimental osteoporosis induced by ovariectomy and vitamin D deficiency does not markedly affect fracture healing in rats. Acta Orthop 78:393–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Keaveny TM, Borchers RE, Gibson LJ, Hayes WC (1993) Theoretical analysis of the experimental artifact in trabecular bone compressive modulus. J Biomech 26:599–607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hildebrand T, Laib A, Muller R, Dequeker J, Ruegsegger P (1999) Direct three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus. J Bone Miner Res 14:1167–1174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hildebrand T, Ruegsegger P (1997) Quantification of bone microarchitecture with the structure model index. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 1:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Odgaard A, Gundersen HJ (1993) Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions. Bone 14:173–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Laib A, Kumer JL, Majumdar S, Lane NE (2001) The temporal changes of trabecular architecture in ovariectomized rats assessed by MicroCT. Osteoporos Int 12:936–941PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ocarino NM, Marubayashi U, Cardoso TG et al (2007) Physical activity in osteopenia treatment improved the mass of bones directly and indirectly submitted to mechanical impact. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 7:84–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jiang SD, Shen C, Jiang LS, Dai LY (2007) Differences of bone mass and bone structure in osteopenic rat models caused by spinal cord injury and ovariectomy. Osteoporos Int 18:743–750PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Iwaniec UT, Moore K, Rivera MF, Myers SE, Vanegas SM, Wronski TJ (2007) A comparative study of the bone-restorative efficacy of anabolic agents in aged ovariectomized rats. Osteoporos Int 18:351–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Nazarian
    • 1
    • 3
  • E. Cory
    • 1
  • R. Müller
    • 4
  • B. D. Snyder
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory (OBL)Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryChildren’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH ZürichZürichSwitzerland
  4. 4.Institute for Biomechanics, ETH ZürichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations