Osteoporosis International

, Volume 19, Issue 10, pp 1409–1419 | Cite as

Signs of irreversible architectural changes occur early in the development of experimental osteoporosis as assessed by in vivo micro-CT

  • G. M. Campbell
  • H. R. Buie
  • S. K. BoydEmail author
Original Article



Using in vivo micro-computed tomography, we assessed bone loss in the rat during the first twelve weeks after ovariectomy when structural changes were most rapid. Significant changes to the trabecular architecture were observed, including irreversible changes reflected by reduction in connectivity after only two weeks. This highlights that topological changes to the structure occur early in this experimental model of osteoporosis.


The purpose of this study was to establish a longitudinal time course of bone loss in the ovariectomized (OVX) rat model during the initial twelve-week period where structural changes are most rapid, and to identify when irreversible changes occur using in vivo micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).


The proximal tibiae of OVX (N = 10) and sham (N = 10) operated mature female Wistar rats were micro-CT scanned every two weeks from week 0 to week 12, excluding week 10. Changes in architecture were quantified using direct three-dimensional techniques and serum osteocalcin and CTX-I was measured at weeks 0, 6 and 12. Biomechanical properties were determined from femoral three-point bending and L-4 vertebral compression at the end of the protocol. ANOVA and paired t-tests were used to analyze the longitudinal and endpoint data, respectively.


All of the measured architectural parameters changed significantly over the study in the OVX group, including irreversible changes reflected by connectivity density after two weeks. Osteocalcin concentration was elevated in the OVX group. Moderate changes in the mechanical properties of the femora midshaft and vertebrae were observed.


Changes to the bone architecture and mechanics within twelve weeks after OVX highlight the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.


Biomarkers of bone turnover Biomechanics Micro-computed tomography Osteoporosis Ovariectomy rat Tibial metaphysis 



The authors wish to acknowledge the technical support of Mr. Josh Klinck and Mr. Wei Liu for their assistance in the micro-CT scanning and image analysis, Ms. Shannon Rooney for her assistance with the mechanical testing and Ms. Jennifer Vuong for her assistance in the biomarker analysis. Additionally we would like to acknowledge the funding provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.

Conflict of interest statement



  1. 1.
    Kanis JA (1994) Osteoporosis. Blackwell Science Ltd., OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dempster DW (2000) The contribution of trabecular architecture to cancellous bone quality. J Bone Miner Res 15:20–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    David V, Laroche N, Boudignon B et al (2003) Noninvasive in vivo monitoring of bone architecture alterations in hindlimb-unloaded female rats using novel three-dimensional microcomputed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 18:1622–1631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Waarsing JH, Day JS, van der Linden JC et al (2004) Detecting and tracking local changes in the tibiae of individual rats: a novel method to analyse longitudinal in vivo micro-CT data. Bone 34:163–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boyd SK, Davison P, Mueller R et al (2006) Monitoring individual morphological changes over time in ovariectomized rats by invivo micro-computed tomography. Bone 39:854–862PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dempster DW, Birchman R, Xu R et al (1995) Temporal changes in cancellous bone structure of rats immediately after ovariectomy. Bone 16:157–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brouwers JE, Van Rietbergen B, Huiskes R (2007) No effects of in vivo micro-CT radiation on structural parameters and bone marrow cells in proximal tibia of wistar rats detected after eight weekly scans. J Orthop Res 25:1325–1332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klinck RJ, Campbell GM, Boyd SK (2007) Radiation effects on bone structure in mice and rats during in-vivo micro-CT scanning. Med Eng Phys Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laib A, Kumer JL, Majumdar S et al (2001) The temporal changes of trabecular architecture in ovariectomized rats assessed by MicroCT. Osteoporos Int 12:936–941PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hildebrand T, Rüegsegger P (1997) A new method for the model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images. J Microsc 185:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Odgaard A (1997) Three-dimensional methods for quantification of cancellous bone architecture. Bone 20:315–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Odgaard A, Gundersen HJ (1993) Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions. Bone 14:173–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hildebrand T, Ruegsegger P (1997) Quantification of bone microarchitecture with the structure model index. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 1:15–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Delmas PD, Eastell R, Garnero P et al (2000) The use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 11:S2–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beer FP, Johnston ER Jr, DeWolf JT (2004) Mechanics of materials, 3/e in SI units. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kinney JH, Ryaby J, Haupt D et al (1998) Three-dimensional in vivo morphometry of trabecular bone in the OVX rat model of osteoporosis. Technol Health Care 6:229–250Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lane NE, Kumer JL, Majumdar S et al (2002) The effects of synthetic conjugated estrogens, A(Cenestin) on trabecular bone structure and strength in the ovariectomized rat model. Osteoporos Int 13:816–823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Griffin MG, Kimble R, Hopfer W et al (1993) Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the rat: accuracy, precision, and measurement of bone loss. J Bone Miner Res 8:795–800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parfitt AM (1992) Implications of architecture for the pathogenesis and prevention of vertebral fracture. Bone 13(Suppl):41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jerome CP, Burr DB, Van Bibber T et al (2001) Treatment with human parathyroaid hormone (1–34) for 18 months increases cancellous bone volume and improves trabecular architecture in ovariectomized Cynomolgus monkeys (macaca fascicularis). Bone 28:150–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sato M, Westmore M, Ma YL et al (2004) Teriparatide [PTH(1–34)] strengthens the proximal femur of ovariectomized nonhuman primates despite increasing porosity. J Bone Miner Res 19:623–629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sato M, Zeng GQ, Turner CH (1997) Biosynthetic human parathyroid hormone (1–34) effects on bone quality in aged ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology 138:4330–4337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Turner RT, Evans GL, Cavolina JM et al (1998) Programmed administration of parathyroid hormone increases bone formation and reduces bone loss in hindlimb-unloaded ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology 139:4086–4091PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mosekilde L, Danielsen CC, Sogaard CH et al (1995) The anabolic effects of parathyroid hormone on cortical bone mass, dimensions and strength - assessed in a sexually mature, ovariectomized rat model. Bone 16:223–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bolotin HH (2007) DXA in vivo BMD methodology: An erroneous and misleading research and clinical gauge of bone mineral status, bone fragility, and bone remodelling. Bone 41:138–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Allen MR, Bloomfield SA (2003) Hindlimb unloading has a greater effect on cortical compared with cancellous bone in mature female rats. J Appl Phys 94:642–650Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hornby SB, Evans GP, Hornby SL et al (2003) Long-term zoledronic acid treatment increases bone structure and mechanical strength of long bones of ovariectomized adult rats. Calcif Tissue Int 72:519–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kippo K, Hannuniemi R, Lauren L et al (1997) Clodronate prevents bone loss in aged ovariectomized rats. Calcif Tissue Int 61:151–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brzoska MM, Majewska K, Moniuszko-Jakoniuk J (2005) Mechanical properties of femoral diaphysis and femoral neck rats chronically exposed to various levels of cadmium. Calcif Tissue Int 76:287–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Turner CH, Burr DB (1993) Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: A tutorial. Bone 14:595–608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Glatt M, Pataki A, Evans GP et al (2004) Loss of vertebral bone and mechanical strength in estrogen-deficient rats is prevented by long-term administration of zoledronic acid. Osteoporos Int 15:707–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sims NA, Morris HA, Moore RJ et al (1996) Increased bone resorption precedes increased bone formation in the ovariectomized rat. Calcif Tissue Int 59:121–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Van Lenthe GH, Voide R, Mueller R (2006) Beam theory strongly underestimates bone tissue properties in a murine model of bone genetics. J Biomech 39:S18Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Homminga J, Huiskes R, Van Rietbergen B et al (2001) Introduction and evaluation of a gray-value voxel conversion technique. J Biomech 34:513–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    MacNeil JA, Boyd SK (2007) Accuracy of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography for measurement of bone quality. Med Eng Phys 29:1096–1105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing EngineeringUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Roger Jackson Centre for Health and Wellness ResearchUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations