Osteoporosis International

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 71–78 | Cite as

Effects of the sample size of reference population on determining BMD reference curve and peak BMD and diagnosing osteoporosis

  • Y.-L. Hou
  • E.-Y. Liao
  • X.-P. Wu
  • Y.-Q. Peng
  • H. Zhang
  • R.-C. Dai
  • X.-H. Luo
  • X.-Z. Cao
Original Article

Abstract

Summary

Establishing reference databases generally requires a large sample size to achieve reliable results. Our study revealed that the varying sample size from hundreds to thousands of individuals has no decisive effect on the bone mineral density (BMD) reference curve, peak BMD, and diagnosing osteoporosis. It provides a reference point for determining the sample size while establishing local BMD reference databases.

Introduction

This study attempts to determine a suitable sample size for establishing bone mineral density (BMD) reference databases in a local laboratory.

Methods

The total reference population consisted of 3,662 Chinese females aged 6–85 years. BMDs were measured with a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry densitometer. The subjects were randomly divided into four different sample groups, that is, total number (Tn) = 3,662, 1/2n = 1,831, 1/4n = 916, and 1/8n = 458. We used the best regression model to determine BMD reference curve and peak BMD.

Results

There was no significant difference in the full curves between the four sample groups at each skeletal site, although some discrepancy at the end of the curves was observed at the spine. Peak BMDs were very similar in the four sample groups. According to the Chinese diagnostic criteria (BMD >25% below the peak BMD as osteoporosis), no difference was observed in the osteoporosis detection rate using the reference values determined by the four different sample groups.

Conclusions

Varying the sample size from hundreds to thousands has no decisive effect on establishing BMD reference curve and determining peak BMD. It should be practical for determining the reference population while establishing local BMD databases.

Keywords

BMD Peak BMD Reference curve Reference population Sample size 

References

  1. 1.
    Liao EY, Wu XP, Luo XH et al (2003) Establishment and evaluation of bone mineral density reference databases appropriate for diagnosis and evaluation of osteoporosis in Chinese women. J Bone Miner Metab 21:184–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wu XP, Liao EY, Zhang H et al (2004) Establishment of BMD reference plots and determination of peak BMD at multiple skeletal regions in mainland Chinese women and the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 15:71–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL et al (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nakamura K, Tanaka Y, Saitou K et al (2000) Age and sex differences in the bone mineral density of the distal forearm based on health check-up data of 6343 Japanese. Osteoporos Int 11:772–777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Iki M, Kagamimori S, Kagawa Y et al (2001) Bone mineral density of the spine, hip and distal forearm in representative samples of the Japanese female population: Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study. Osteoporos Int 12:529–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lynn HS, Lau EM, Au B et al (2005) Bone mineral density reference norms for Hong Kong Chinese. Osteoporos Int 16:1663–1668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pedrazzoni M, Girasole G, Bertoldo F et al (2003) Definition of a population-specific DXA reference standard in Italian women: the Densitometric Italian Normative Study (DINS). Osteoporos Int 14:978–982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Forsmo S, Langhammer A, Forsen L et al (2005) Forearm bone mineral density in an unselected population of 2,779 men and women—the HUNT Study, Norway. Osteoporos Int 16:562–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ardawi MS, Maimany AA, Bahksh TM et al (2005) Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Saudis. Osteoporos Int 16:43–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mazess RB, Barden H (1999) Bone density of the spine and femur in adult white females. Calcif Tissue Int 65:91–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maalouf G, Salem S, Sandid M et al (2000) Bone mineral density of the Lebanese reference population. Osteoporos Int 11:756–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dougherty G, Al-Marzouk N (2001) Bone density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in healthy Kuwaiti women. Calcif Tissue Int 68:225–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yao WJ, Wu CH, Wang ST et al (2001) Differential changes in regional bone mineral density in healthy Chinese: age-related and sex-dependent. Calcif Tissue Int 68:330–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Manisali M, Ozaksoy D, Yilmaz E et al (2003) Bone mineral density reference values in the normal female and male population of Izmir, Turkey. Eur Radiol 13:157–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    El Maghraoui A, Guerboub AA, Achemlal L et al (2006) Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Moroccan women. J Clin Densitom 9:454–460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Walker MD, Babbar R, Opotowsky AR et al (2006) A referent bone mineral density database for Chinese American women. Osteoporos Int 17:878–887PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kelly TL (1992) Study protocol QDR reference databases. Hologic, Inc., Bedford, MAGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peel NF, Eastell R (1994) Diagnostic value of estimated volumetric bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:317–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bonnick SL, Johnston CC Jr, Kleerekoper M et al (2001) Importance of precision in bone density measurements. J Clin Densitom 4:105–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu Z, Piao J, Pang L et al (2002) The diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis and the incidence of osteoporosis in China. J Bone Miner Metab 20:181–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kanis JA, Melton LJ 3rd, Christiansen C et al (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:1137–1141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Deleze M, Cons-Molina F, Villa AR et al (2000) Geographic differences in bone mineral density of Mexican women. Osteoporos Int 11:562–569PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tenenhouse A, Joseph L, Kreiger N et al (2000) Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporos Int 11:897–904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kaneko M, Miyake T, Yokoyama E et al (2000) Standard radial bone mineral density and physical factors in ordinary Japanese women. J Bone Miner Metab 18:31–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Molyvda-Athanasopoulou E, Sioundas A, Hatziioannou K (2000) Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry reference data for Greek population. The impact on diagnosis of using various normal ranges for comparison. Eur J Radiol 36:36–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Orimo H, Hayashi Y, Fukunaga M et al (2001) Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision. J Bone Miner Metab 19:331–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y.-L. Hou
    • 1
  • E.-Y. Liao
    • 1
  • X.-P. Wu
    • 1
  • Y.-Q. Peng
    • 1
  • H. Zhang
    • 1
  • R.-C. Dai
    • 1
  • X.-H. Luo
    • 1
  • X.-Z. Cao
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Metabolism and Endocrinology, The Second Xiang-Ya HospitalCentral South UniversityChangshaPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations