Skip to main content

Effects of the sample size of reference population on determining BMD reference curve and peak BMD and diagnosing osteoporosis

Osteoporosis International volume 19, pages 71–78 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

Summary

Establishing reference databases generally requires a large sample size to achieve reliable results. Our study revealed that the varying sample size from hundreds to thousands of individuals has no decisive effect on the bone mineral density (BMD) reference curve, peak BMD, and diagnosing osteoporosis. It provides a reference point for determining the sample size while establishing local BMD reference databases.

Introduction

This study attempts to determine a suitable sample size for establishing bone mineral density (BMD) reference databases in a local laboratory.

Methods

The total reference population consisted of 3,662 Chinese females aged 6–85 years. BMDs were measured with a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry densitometer. The subjects were randomly divided into four different sample groups, that is, total number (Tn) = 3,662, 1/2n = 1,831, 1/4n = 916, and 1/8n = 458. We used the best regression model to determine BMD reference curve and peak BMD.

Results

There was no significant difference in the full curves between the four sample groups at each skeletal site, although some discrepancy at the end of the curves was observed at the spine. Peak BMDs were very similar in the four sample groups. According to the Chinese diagnostic criteria (BMD >25% below the peak BMD as osteoporosis), no difference was observed in the osteoporosis detection rate using the reference values determined by the four different sample groups.

Conclusions

Varying the sample size from hundreds to thousands has no decisive effect on establishing BMD reference curve and determining peak BMD. It should be practical for determining the reference population while establishing local BMD databases.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Liao EY, Wu XP, Luo XH et al (2003) Establishment and evaluation of bone mineral density reference databases appropriate for diagnosis and evaluation of osteoporosis in Chinese women. J Bone Miner Metab 21:184–192

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu XP, Liao EY, Zhang H et al (2004) Establishment of BMD reference plots and determination of peak BMD at multiple skeletal regions in mainland Chinese women and the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 15:71–79

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL et al (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–489

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakamura K, Tanaka Y, Saitou K et al (2000) Age and sex differences in the bone mineral density of the distal forearm based on health check-up data of 6343 Japanese. Osteoporos Int 11:772–777

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Iki M, Kagamimori S, Kagawa Y et al (2001) Bone mineral density of the spine, hip and distal forearm in representative samples of the Japanese female population: Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study. Osteoporos Int 12:529–537

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lynn HS, Lau EM, Au B et al (2005) Bone mineral density reference norms for Hong Kong Chinese. Osteoporos Int 16:1663–1668

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pedrazzoni M, Girasole G, Bertoldo F et al (2003) Definition of a population-specific DXA reference standard in Italian women: the Densitometric Italian Normative Study (DINS). Osteoporos Int 14:978–982

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Forsmo S, Langhammer A, Forsen L et al (2005) Forearm bone mineral density in an unselected population of 2,779 men and women—the HUNT Study, Norway. Osteoporos Int 16:562–567

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ardawi MS, Maimany AA, Bahksh TM et al (2005) Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Saudis. Osteoporos Int 16:43–55

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mazess RB, Barden H (1999) Bone density of the spine and femur in adult white females. Calcif Tissue Int 65:91–99

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maalouf G, Salem S, Sandid M et al (2000) Bone mineral density of the Lebanese reference population. Osteoporos Int 11:756–764

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dougherty G, Al-Marzouk N (2001) Bone density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in healthy Kuwaiti women. Calcif Tissue Int 68:225–229

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yao WJ, Wu CH, Wang ST et al (2001) Differential changes in regional bone mineral density in healthy Chinese: age-related and sex-dependent. Calcif Tissue Int 68:330–336

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Manisali M, Ozaksoy D, Yilmaz E et al (2003) Bone mineral density reference values in the normal female and male population of Izmir, Turkey. Eur Radiol 13:157–162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. El Maghraoui A, Guerboub AA, Achemlal L et al (2006) Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Moroccan women. J Clin Densitom 9:454–460

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Walker MD, Babbar R, Opotowsky AR et al (2006) A referent bone mineral density database for Chinese American women. Osteoporos Int 17:878–887

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kelly TL (1992) Study protocol QDR reference databases. Hologic, Inc., Bedford, MA

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peel NF, Eastell R (1994) Diagnostic value of estimated volumetric bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:317–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bonnick SL, Johnston CC Jr, Kleerekoper M et al (2001) Importance of precision in bone density measurements. J Clin Densitom 4:105–110

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu Z, Piao J, Pang L et al (2002) The diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis and the incidence of osteoporosis in China. J Bone Miner Metab 20:181–189

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kanis JA, Melton LJ 3rd, Christiansen C et al (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:1137–1141

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Deleze M, Cons-Molina F, Villa AR et al (2000) Geographic differences in bone mineral density of Mexican women. Osteoporos Int 11:562–569

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tenenhouse A, Joseph L, Kreiger N et al (2000) Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporos Int 11:897–904

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaneko M, Miyake T, Yokoyama E et al (2000) Standard radial bone mineral density and physical factors in ordinary Japanese women. J Bone Miner Metab 18:31–35

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Molyvda-Athanasopoulou E, Sioundas A, Hatziioannou K (2000) Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry reference data for Greek population. The impact on diagnosis of using various normal ranges for comparison. Eur J Radiol 36:36–40

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Orimo H, Hayashi Y, Fukunaga M et al (2001) Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision. J Bone Miner Metab 19:331–337

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Metabolism and Endocrinology, The Second Xiang-Ya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China

    Y.-L. Hou, E.-Y. Liao, X.-P. Wu, Y.-Q. Peng, H. Zhang, R.-C. Dai, X.-H. Luo & X.-Z. Cao

Authors
  1. Y.-L. Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E.-Y. Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. X.-P. Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Y.-Q. Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H. Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R.-C. Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. X.-H. Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. X.-Z. Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to X.-P. Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hou, YL., Liao, EY., Wu, XP. et al. Effects of the sample size of reference population on determining BMD reference curve and peak BMD and diagnosing osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 19, 71–78 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0436-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0436-7

Keywords

  • BMD
  • Peak BMD
  • Reference curve
  • Reference population
  • Sample size