Osteoporosis International

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 159–166 | Cite as

The importance of communication in secondary fragility fracture treatment and prevention

  • L. M. Meadows
  • L. A. Mrkonjic
  • M. D. O’Brien
  • W. Tink
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

We report on a Canadian longitudinal qualitative case study of midlife women with fragility fractures, their treating orthopaedic surgeons and family physicians.

Methods

Women and their treating physicians were followed for an average of one year post fracture to investigate the health outcomes and what, if any, follow-up occurred aimed at secondary fracture prevention. The final dataset includes 223 interviews gathered from women aged 40 to 65 with fragility fractures, orthopaedic surgeons and family physicians.

Results

The circle of care for those with fragility fractures is disrupted at vital communication junctures: (1) the inconsistent flow of information between acute care institutions and family physicians; (2) unidirectional and inconsistent communication from orthopaedic surgeons to family physicians; and (3) competing demands of the cast clinic environment and patient expectations. It is not the lack of will that is undermining the consistent and detailed communication among patients, physicians and institutions. It is the episodic nature of fracture care that makes communication among involved parties difficult, if not impossible.

Conclusions

Communication about events, acuity and clear expectations around roles and follow-up is urgently needed to improve communication throughout the circle of care to support secondary fracture prevention. Fractures from a standing height or similar trauma in women aged 40 to 65 should be treated as suspicious fractures and followed-up to investigate the underlying bone condition. This article reports on challenges and barriers to clear communication among women, their orthopaedic surgeons and family physicians that is necessary for follow-up and prevention of future fractures.

Keywords

Communication Continuity of care Early intervention Osteoporosis Secondary fragility fractures Women’s health 

References

  1. 1.
    Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, et al (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15(4):721–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown JP, Josse RG (2002) 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 167(Suppl 10):S1–34Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McLellan AR, Gallacher SJ, Fraser M, McQuillian C (2003) The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 14(12):1028–1034PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meadows LM, Mrkonjic L (2003) Breaking-bad news: women’s experiences of fractures at midlife. Can J Public Health 94(6):427–430PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meadows LM, Mrkonjic L, Petersen KMA, Lagendyk L (2004) After the fall: women’s views of fractures in relation to bone health at midlife. Women Health 39(2):47–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McLellan AR (2003) Identification and treatment of osteoporosis in fractures. Curr Rheumatol Rep 5(1):57–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Staa TP, Leufkens HG, Cooper C (2002) Does a fracture at one site predict later fractures at other sites? A British cohort study. Osteoporos Int 13(8):624–629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raisz LG (2005) Clinical practice. Screening for osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 353(2):164–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meadows LM, Mrkonjic L, Lagendyk L (2005) Women’s perceptions of future risk after low-energy fractures at midlife. Ann Fam Med 3(1):64–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cuddihy MT, Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, et al (2002) Osteoporosis intervention following distal forearm fractures: a missed opportunity? Arch Intern Med 162(4):421–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hajcsar EE, Hawker G, Bogoch ER (2000) Investigation and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures. CMAJ 163(7):819–822PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Papaioannou A, Giangregorio L, Kvern B, et al (2004) The osteoporosis care gap in Canada. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 5(1):11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Simonelli C, Chen YT, Morancey J, et al (2003) Evaluation and management of osteoporosis following hospitalization for low-impact fracture. J Gen Intern Med 18(1):17–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Siris ES, Bilezikian JP, Rubin MR, et al (2003) Pins and plaster aren’t enough: a call for the evaluation and treatment of patients with osteoporotic fractures. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88(8):3482–3486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khan SA, de Geus C, Holroyd B, Russell AS (2001) Osteoporosis follow up after wrist fractures following minor trauma. Arch Intern Med 161(10):1309–1312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tosi LL, Lane JM (1998) Osteoporosis prevention and the orthopaedic surgeon: when fracture care is not enough [editorial]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80(11):1567–1569PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tosi LL (2000) Women and the orthopaedic surgeon: changing the relationship. Clin Orthop Relat Res 372:17–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dobbs Mb, Buckwalter J, Saltzman C (1999) Osteoporosis: the increasing role of the orthopaed. Iowa Orthop J 19:43–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Simonelli C, Killeen K, Mehle S, Swanson L (2002) Barriers to osteoporosis identification and treatment among primary care physicians and orthopedic surgeons. Mayo Clin Proc 77(4):334–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Skedros JG (2004) The orthopaedic surgeon’s role in diagnosing and treating patients with osteoporotic fractures: standing discharge orders may be the solution for timely medical care. Osteoporos Int 15(5):405–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jagla S, McIsaac WJ, Hawker G, et al (2003) Information needs in the management of osteoporosis in family practice: an illustration of the failure of the current guideline implementation process. Osteoporosis Int 14:672–676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jaglal SB, Carroll J, Hawker G, et al (2003) How are family physicians managing osteoporosis? Qualitative study of their experiences and educational needs. Can Fam Physician 49:462–468PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gallager TC, Geling O, Comite F (2002) Missed opportunities for prevention of osteoporotic fracture. Arch Intern Med 162(4):450–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Freedman KB, Kaplan FS, Bilker WB, et al (2000) Treatment of osteoporosis: are physicians missing an opportunity? J Bone Joint Surg Am 82–A(8):1063–1070PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Backett-Milburn K, Parry O, Mauthner N (2000) ‘I’ll worry about that when it comes along’: osteoporosis, a meaningful issue for women at mid-life? Health Educ Res 15(2):153–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ribeiro V, Blakeley J, Laryea M (2000) Women’s knowledge and practices regarding the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Health Care Women Int 21(4):347–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cuddihy MT, Amadio PC, Gabriel SE, et al (2004) A prospective clinical practice intervention to improve osteoporosis management following distal forearm fracture. Osteoporos Int 15(9):695–700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Papaioannou A, Parkinson W, Adachi J, et al (1998) Women’ decisions about hormone replacement therapy after education and bone densitometry. CMAJ 159(10):1253–1257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Papaioannou A, Ioannidis G, Adachi JD, et al (2003) Adherence to bisphosphonates and hormone replacement therapy in a tertiary care setting of patients in the CANDOO database. Osteoporos Int 14(10):808–813PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yin RK (2003) Applications of Case Study Research, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Agar MH (1986) Speaking of Ethnography. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Creswell JW (1998) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Meadows LM, Verdi AJ, Crabtree BF (2003) Keeping up appearances: using qualitative research to enhance knowledge of dental practice. J Dent Educ 67(9):981–990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jennett PA (1995) Chart stimulated recall: a technique to assess clinical competence and performance. Educ Gen Practice 6:30–34Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Borkan JM (1999) Immersion / crystallization. In: BF Crabtree, WL Miller (eds) Doing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 179–194Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Denzin NK (1989) Interpretive Interactionism. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Crabtree BF, Miller WL (1999) The dance of interpretation. In: BF Crabtree, WL Miller (eds) Doing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 127–144Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Meadows LM, Morse JM (2001) Constructing evidence within the qualitative project. In: JM Morse, JM Swanson, A Kuzel (eds) The Nature of Qualitative Evidence. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 187–200Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Einhorn T (2000) Osteoporosis: the missed opportunity of orthopaedics [commentary]. J Bone Joint Surg, Available at http://www.jbjs.org/Comments/c_p_einhorn.shtml. Accessed 16 August 2006
  41. 41.
    Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Tallia AF, et al (2005) Delivery of clinical preventive services in family medicine offices. Ann Fam Med 3(5):430–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. M. Meadows
    • 1
  • L. A. Mrkonjic
    • 2
  • M. D. O’Brien
    • 3
  • W. Tink
    • 4
  1. 1.Departments of Family Medicine and Community Health SciencesUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Department of Surgery and Community Health Sciences, Division of Orthopaedic SurgeryCalgary Health RegionCalgaryCanada
  3. 3.Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic SurgeryCalgary Health RegionCalgaryCanada
  4. 4.Department of Family MedicineCalgary Health Region and University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations