Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reduced loading due to spinal-cord injury at birth results in “slender” bones: a case study

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The present case study compared bone density, bone geometry and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) in a male who sustained spinal-cord injury (SCI) at birth (from here called SCI-B) with two matched controls without SCI, and also with four individuals with SCI of similar level and injury completeness but sustained at age 15 or greater.

Methods

All subjects with SCI were at least 3 years post-injury and had experienced motor incomplete lesions at the cervical level. Computed tomography was used to measure volumetric bone density, indices of bone strength [CSA and maximum, minimum and polar area moments of inertia (I max, I min, I pol)] and muscle CSA at the tibia (66% of tibia length, measured proximally from the distal end).

Results

Lower leg muscle CSA of SCI-B was 63±6% of values in non-SCI controls, and 72±12% of values in other males with SCI. In SCI-B, bone CSA was roughly half (52±4%) that of non-SCI controls and 73±16% of bone CSA values in other males with SCI. The magnitudes of the area moment of inertia variables (I max, I min, and I pol) in SCI-B were ~25% of control values. Further, the moment of inertia variables in SCI-B were 27–54% of values obtained in other males with SCI, indicating that experiencing SCI in the early stages of life has a remarkable impact on bone shape. Interestingly, tibia bone density did not appear to be affected; the average difference in bone density between SCI-B and non-SCI controls was −1.2±0.7%. The bone densities of other males with SCI were 4–19% lower than in SCI-B.

Conclusions

Muscle atrophy and bone loss are commonly reported consequences of SCI. This case reveals that important changes in bone geometry occur after SCI, and that mechanical loading during growth plays a vital role in the development of bone size and shape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zehnder Y, Luthi M, Michel D, Knecht H, Perrelet R, Neto I, Kraenzlin M, Zach G, Lippuner K (2004) Long-term changes in bone metabolism, bone mineral density, quantitative ultrasound parameters, and fracture incidence after spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional observational study in 100 paraplegic men. Osteoporos Int 15(3):180–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. de Bruin ED, Herzog R, Rozendal RH, Michel D, Stussi E (2000) Estimation of geometric properties of cortical bone in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81:150–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moynahan M, Betz RR, Triolo RJ, Maurer AH (1996) Characterization of the bone mineral density of children with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 19(4):249–254

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin RB (2002) Size, structure and gender: lessons about fracture risk. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2(3):209–211

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heinonen A, Sievanen H, Kannus P, Oja P, Vuori I (2002) Site-specific skeletal response to long-term weight training seems to be attributable to principal loading modality: a PQCT study of female weightlifters. Calcif Tissue Int 70(6):469–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones HH, Priest JD, Hayes WC, Tichenor CC, Nagel DA (1977) Humeral hypertrophy in response to exercise. J Bone Jt Surg Am 59(2):204–208

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ditunno JF Jr, Young W, Donovan WH, Creasey G (1994) The international standards booklet for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal Injury Association. Paraplegia 32(2):70–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gluer CC, Blake G, Lu Y, Blunt BA, Jergas M, Genant HK (1995) Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 5(4):262–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lorentzon M, Mellstrom D, Ohlsson C (2005) Association of amount of physical activity with cortical bone size and trabecular volumetric BMD in young adult men: the GOOD study. J Bone Miner Res 20(11):1936–1943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haapasalo H, Kontulainen S, Sievanen H, Kannus P, Jarvinen M, Vuori I (2000) Exercise-induced bone gain is due to enlargement in bone size without a change in volumetric bone density: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study of the upper arms of male tennis players. Bone 27(3):351–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kontulainen S, Sievanen H, Kannus P, Pasanen M, Vuori I (2003) Effect of long-term impact-loading on mass, size, and estimated strength of humerus and radius of female racquet-sports players: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study between young and old starters and controls. J Bone Miner Res 18(2):352–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eser P, Frotzler A, Zehnder Y, Wick L, Knecht H, Denoth J, Schiessl H (2004) Relationship between the duration of paralysis and bone structure: a PQCT study of spinal cord injured individuals. Bone 34(5):869–880

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Castro MJ, Apple DF Jr, Hillegass EA, Dudley GA (1999) Influence of complete spinal cord injury on skeletal muscle cross-sectional area within the first 6 months of injury. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 80(4):373–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Castro MJ, Apple DF Jr, Hillegass EA, Dudley GA (1999) Influence of complete spinal cord injury on skeletal muscle cross-sectional area within the first 6 months of injury. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 80(4):373–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. M. Giangregorio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giangregorio, L.M., McCartney, N. Reduced loading due to spinal-cord injury at birth results in “slender” bones: a case study. Osteoporos Int 18, 117–120 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0201-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0201-3

Keywords

Navigation