Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Teriparatide vs. calcitonin in the treatment of Asian postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compared the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of daily subcutaneous injections of teriparatide and salmon calcitonin in the treatment of postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis in Taiwan. This 6-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled study enrolled 63 women with established osteoporosis. They were randomized to receive either teriparatide 20 µg or calcitonin 100 IU daily in an open-label fashion. Lumber spine, femoral neck, total hip bone mineral density (BMD), and biochemical markers of bone turnover were measured, and adverse events and tolerability were recorded. The results at 6 months showed that patients using teriparatide had larger mean increases in spinal BMD than those who used calcitonin (4.5% vs. 0.1%), but the BMD changes in these two groups at the femoral neck and the total hip were not significant. There were also larger mean increases in bone markers in the teriparatide group than in the calcitonin group (bone specific alkaline phosphatase 142% vs. 37%; osteocalcin 154% vs. 23%). We conclude that teriparatide has more positive effects on bone formation than salmon calcitonin, as shown by the larger increments of lumbar spine BMD and bone formation markers, and caused only mild adverse events and no significant change in liver, kidney or hematological parameters. Compared with the published global results, teriparatide seems to be equally effective and safe to use in this Asian population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Charles W, Slemenda C, Johnston C Jr (1999) Epidemiology of osteoporosis. In: Lobo RA (ed) Treatment of the postmenopausal women: basic and clinical aspects. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 279–285

  2. Yang TS, Chen YR, Chen YJ, et al (2004) Osteoporosis: prevalence in Taiwanese women. Osteoporos Int 15:345–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsai KS, Tai TY (1997) Epidemiology of osteoporosis in Taiwan. Osteoporos Int 7:S96–S98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Riggs BL (1992) The problem of osteoporosis-its prevention and treatment. In: Riggs BL (ed) Prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Hogrefe & Huber, Lewiston, pp 9–11

  5. Cranney A, Guyatt G, Griffith L, et al (2002) Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. IX. Summary of meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 23:570–578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, et al (1996) Randomized trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Lancet 348:1535–1541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Harris ST, Watts NB, Genant HK, et al (1999) Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 282:1344–1352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chesnut CH, Silverman S, Andriano K, et al. for the PROOF study group (2000) A randomized trial of nasal spray salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis: the Prevent Recurrence of Osteoporotic Fractures Study. Am J Med 109:267–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ettinger B, Black DM, Mitlak BH et al (1999) Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators. JAMA 282 637–645

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crandall C (2002) Parathyroid hormone for treatment of osteoporosis Arch Intern Med 162:2297–2309

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, et al (2001) Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 344:1434–1441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Orwoll ES, Scheele WH, Paul S, et al (2003) The effect of teriparatide [human parathyroid hormone (1–34)] therapy on bone density in men with osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 18:9–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kurland ES, Cosman F, McMahon DJ, et al (2000) Parathyroid hormone as a therapy for idiopathic osteoporosis in men: effects on bone mineral density and bone markers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:3069–3076

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Body JJ (2002) Calcitonin for the long-term prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bone 30:75S–79S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gruber HE, Ivey JL, Baylink DJ, et al (1984) Long-term calcitonin therapy in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Metabolism 33:295–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gennari C, Chierichetti SM, Bigazzi S, et al (1985) Comparative effects on bone mineral content of calcium and calcium plus salmon calcitonin given in two different regimes in post menopausal osteoporosis. Curr Ther Res 38:455–464

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mazzuoli GF, Passeri M, Gennari C, et al (1986) Effects of salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a controlled double-blind study. Calcif Tissue Int 38:3–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kujik C, et al (1993) Vertebral assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Finkelstein JS (1996) Pharmacological mechanisms of therapeutics: parathyroid hormone. In: Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA (eds) Principles of bone biology, 2nd edn, vol. 2. Academic, pp 993–1005

  20. Hodsman AB, Fraher LJ, Watson PH, et al (1997) A randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of cyclical parathyroid hormone versus cyclical parathyroid hormone and sequential calcitonin to improve bone mass in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:620–628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thamsborg G, Storm TL, Sykulski R, et al (1991) Effect of different doses of nasal salmon calcitonin on bone mass. Calcif Tissue Int 48:302–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Overgaard K, Hansen MA, Jensen SB, et al (1992) Effect of calcitonin given intranasally on bone mass and fracture rates in established osteoporosis: a dose-response study. BMJ 305:556–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Reginster JY, Denis D, Albert A, et al (1987) Assessment of the biological effectiveness of nasal synthetic salmon calcitonin (SSCT) by comparison with intramuscular (i.m.) or placebo injection in normal subjects. Bone Miner 2:133–140

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Overgaard K, Agnusdei D, Hansen MA, et al (1991) Dose-response bioactivity and bioavailability of salmon calcitonin in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:344–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rittmaster RS, Bolognese M, Ettinger MP, et al (2000) Enhancement of bone mass in osteoporotic women with parathyroid hormone followed by alendronate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2129–2134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zanchetta JR, Bogado CE, Ferretti JL, et al (2003) Effects of teriparatide [recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34)] on cortical bone in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 18:539–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Delmas PD, Seeman E (2004) Changes in bone mineral density explain little of the reduction in vertebral or nonvertebral fracture risk with anti-resorptive therapy. Bone 34:599–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Eli Lilly & Co., Inc., as a phase IIIB clinical trial for registration in Taiwan. We thank Dr. Thiebaud for reviewing the text, APEX International Clinical Research Co, Ltd., for their help in data analysis, and the clinical staff at their study sites for their contributions to the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. S. Tsai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hwang, J.S., Tu, S.T., Yang, T.S. et al. Teriparatide vs. calcitonin in the treatment of Asian postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17, 373–378 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-2002-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-2002-5

Keywords

Navigation