Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

High parity is associated with increased bone size and strength

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some, but not all, studies report an association between decreased hip fracture risk and high parity despite similar bone mineral density (BMD). Our hypothesis was that bone size, a major determinant of bone strength, is greater in women with high parity compared with low parity or nulliparous women. A cross-sectional study of 168 Hutterite women aged 40–80 years was conducted. BMD, bone mineral content (BMC) and bone area of the total body (TB), hip, femoral neck (FN), and lumbar spine (LS) were measured, as well as bone geometry at the 4% and 20% distal radius and bending strength at 20% radius. Diet and activity recall and strength measurements were obtained. Of the 168 women, 42 (25%) were nulliparous while the remaining women reported 1 to 16 births (median=6). Of the 126 parous women, 122 (97%) breast-fed their infants (range 1.5–24 months). Hip, FN and LS BMD were not associated with either parity or months of breast-feeding. TB BMC and bone area (both, p <0.05) and FN bone area ( p <0.01) were associated with parity. FN bone area was 4% greater in women with 7+ vs 1–4 children. Torsional bending strength, which includes structural and material bone properties, at the 20% distal radius was greater with higher parity ( p =0.01). No bone measure was associated with average months of breast-feeding. High parity is associated with increased radial torsional bending strength and femoral neck size. The greater femoral neck size, without higher BMD, may explain the reduced hip fracture risk among women with high parity previously reported in some studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aloia JF, Vaswani AN, Yeh JK, Ross P, Ellis K, Cohn SH (1983) Determinants of bone mass in postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med 143:1700–1704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Feldblum PJ, Zhang J, Rich LE, Fortney JA, Talmage RV (1992) Lactation history and bone mineral density among perimenopausal women. Epidemiology 3:527–531

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hreshchyshyn MM, Hopkins A, Zylstra S, Anbar M (1988) Associations of parity, breast-feeding, and birth control pills with lumbar spine and femoral neck bone densities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159:318–322

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Melton LJ 3rd, Bryant SC, Wahner HW, O’Fallon WM, Malkasian GD, Judd HL, Riggs BL (1993) Influence of breastfeeding and other reproductive factors on bone mass later in life. Osteoporos Int 3:76–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lissner L, Bengtsson C, Hansson T (1991) Bone mineral content in relation to lactation history in pre- and postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 48:319–325

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wardlaw GM, Pke AM (1986) The effect of lactation on peak adult shaft and ultra-distal forearm bone mass in women. Am J Clin Nutr 44:283–286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Walker ARP, Richardson B, Walker F (1972) The influence of numerous pregnancies and lactations on bone dimensions in South African Bantu and Caucasian mothers. Clin Sci 42:189–196

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Henderson PH, Sower M, Kutzko KE, Jannausch ML (2000) Bone mineral density in grand multiparous women with extended lactation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1371–1377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kreiger N, Kelsey JL, Holford TR, O’Connor T (1982) An epidemiologic study of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol 116:141–148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kreiger N, Gross A, Hunter G (1992) Dietary factors and fracture in postmenopausal women: A case-control study. Int J Epidemiol 21:953–958

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alderman BW, Weiss NS, Daling JR, Ure CL, Ballard JH (1986) Reproductive history and postmenopausal risk of hip and forearm fracture. Am J Epidemiol 124:262–267

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cumming RG, Klineberg RJ (1993) Breastfeeding and other reproductive factors and the risk of hip fractures in elderly women. Int J Epidemiol 22:684–691

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoffman S, Grisso JA, Kelsey JL, Gammon DM, O;Brien LA (1993) Parity, lactation and hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 3:171–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Michaelsson K, Baron JA, Farahmand BY, Ljunghall S (2001) Influence of parity and lactation on hip fracture risk. Am J Epidemiol 153:1166–1172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hillier TA, Rizzo JH, Pedula KL, Stone KL, Cauley JA, Bauer DC, Cummings SR (2003) Nulliparity and fracture risk in older women: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Bone Miner Res 18:893–899

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Orwoll ES (2003) Toward an expanded understanding of the role of the periosteum in skeletal health. J Bone Miner Res 18:949–954

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Frost H (1989) Mechanical usage, bone mass, bone fragility: a brief overview. In: Kleerekoper M, Krane S (eds) Clinical disorders of bone and mineral metabolism. Liebert, New York, pp 15–40

  18. Robling AG, Duijvelaar KM, Geevers JV, Ohashi N, Turner CH (2001) Modulation of appositional and longitudinal bone growth in the rat ulna by applied static and dynamic force. Bone 29:105–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wosje KS, Binkley TL, Fahrenwald NL, Specker BL (2000) High bone mass in a female Hutterite population. J Bone Miner Res 15:1429–1436

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wosje KS, Binkley TL, Specker BL (2001) Comparison of bone parameters by DXA and pQCT in Hutterite versus Non-Hutterite females ages 35–60 years. Bone 29:192–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferretti JL (1999) Chapter 26: Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) for evaluating structural and mechanical properties of small bone. In: An YH, Draughn RA (eds) Mechanical testing of bone and bone-implant interface. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA

  22. Paffenbarger RS, Wing AL, Hyde RT (1978) Physical activity as an index of heart attack risk in college alumni. Am J Epidemiol 108:161–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Widdowson EM (1981) Changes in body composition during growth. In: Davis JA, Dobbings J (eds) Scientific foundations of pediatrics. Heinemann Medical Books, London, pp 330–342

  24. Laskey MA, Prentice A, Hanratty LA, Jarjou LMA, Dibba B, Beavan SR, Cole TJ (1998) Bone changes after 3 months of lactation: influence of calcium intake, breast-milk output, and vitamin D-receptor genotype. Am J Clin Nutr 67:685–692

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kent GN, Price RI, Gutteridge D, Smith M, Allen J, Bhagat C, Barnes M, Hickling C, Retallack R, Wilson S, Devlin R, Davies C, St. John A (1990) Human lactation: Forearm trabecular bone loss, increased bone turnover, and renal conservation of calcium and inorganic phosphate with recovery of bone mass following weaning. J Bone Miner Res 5:361–369

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kalkwarf HJ, Specker BL (1995) Bone mineral loss during lactation and recovery during weaning. Obstet Gynecol 86:26–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kalkwarf HJ, Specker BL, Bianchi DC, Ranz J, Ho M (1997) The effect of calcium supplementation on bone density during lactation and after weaning. New Engl J Med 337:523–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sowers MF, Randolph J, Shapiro B, Jannausch M (1995) A prospective study of bone density and pregnancy after an extended period of lactation with bone loss. Obstet Gynecol 85:285–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sowers M, Crutchfield M, Jannausch M, Updike S, Corton G (1991) A prospective evaluation of bone mineral change in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 77:841–845

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ensom MHH, Liu PY, Stephenson MD (2002) Effect of pregnancy on bone mineral density in healthy women. Obstet Gynecol 57:99–111

    Google Scholar 

  31. Seeman E, Duan Y, Fong C, Edmonds J (2001) Fracture site-specific deficits in bone size and volumetric density in men with spine or hip fractures. J Bone Miner Res 16:120–127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gilsanz V, Loro ML, Roe TF, Sayre J, Gilsanz R, Schulz EE (1995) Vertebral size in elderly women with osteoporosis. J Clin Invest 95:2332–2337

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Heinonen A, Oja P, Kannus P, Sievanen H, Haapasalo H, Manttari A, Vuori I (1995) Bone mineral density in female athletes representing sports with different loading characteristics of the skeleton. Bone 17:197–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Heinonen A, Sievanen H, Kyrolainen H, Perttunen J, Kannus P (2001) Mineral mass, size, and estimated mechanical strength of triple jumpers’ lower limb. Bone 29:279–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Heinonen A, McKay HA, MacKelvie KJ, Whittall KP, Forster BB, Khan KM (2001) High-impact exercise and tibial polar moment of inertia in pre-and early pubertal girls: A quantitative MRI study. J Bone Miner Res 16:S482

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bass SL (2000) The prepubertal years: A uniquely opportune stage of growth when the skeleton is most responsive to exercise. Sports Med 30:73–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kontulainen S, Sievanen H, Kannus P, Pasanen M, Vuori I (2002) Effect of long-term impact-loading on mass, size, and estimated strength of humerus and radius of female racquet-sports players: A peripheral quantitative computed tomography study between young and old starters and controls. J Bone Miner Res 18:352–359

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant #R01-AR47852

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ethel Austin Martin Program in Human Nutrition, South Dakota State University, EAM Bldg, Box 2204, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA

    Bonny Specker & Teresa Binkley

Authors
  1. Bonny Specker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Teresa Binkley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bonny Specker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Specker, B., Binkley, T. High parity is associated with increased bone size and strength. Osteoporos Int 16, 1969–1974 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1978-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1978-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation