Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of the Qualeffo–31, an osteoporosis-specific quality-of-life questionnaire

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Vertebral deformities are a common consequence of osteoporosis and are known to decrease quality of life. The Qualeffo–41 is a quality-of-life questionnaire especially developed for measuring quality of life in patients with vertebral deformities. It consists of 41 questions arranged in five domains: pain, physical function, social function, general health perception, and mental function. The objectives of this study were: (1) to develop a shorter version of the Qualeffo–41 by removing redundant questions; and (2) to investigate the scale characteristics, reliability, and validity of this shorter version.

Methods

The study was performed using data from the Qualeffo validation study and the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) study. The analyses were performed in patients with vertebral deformities (n=579). Factor analysis on polychoric correlations and an item response theory (IRT) model, i.e., the generalized partial credit model (GPCM), were used to create a shorter version of Qualeffo–41. Using GPCM, scoring weights were computed for all items.

Results

Three items were removed from the data set because of too many missing values. Factor analysis identified three instead of five domains: (1) pain, (2) physical function, and (3) mental function. Five items had factor loadings <0.4 and were not included in the GPCM. After excluding several items, the domains pain (four items), physical function (18 items), and mental function (nine items) showed a good, reasonable, and excellent fit, respectively. This indicates that the mental function domain and the pain domain are more unidimensional than the physical function domain. All three domains showed a very high correlation (r ≥0.95) with the corresponding domains of the Qualeffo–41.

Conclusions

Qualeffo–31 was developed, consisting of three domains with a reasonable to excellent fit to the GPCM. Although the fit to the GPCM supports the construct validity of the Qualeffo–31, validation in a new study should be performed before using it in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hasserius R, Redlund–Johnell I, Mellstrom D, Johansson C, Nilsson BE, Johnell O (2001) Vertebral deformation in urban Swedish men and women – Prevalence based on 797 subjects. Acta Orthop Scand 72:273–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones G, White C, Nguyen T, Sambrook PN, Kelly PJ, Eisman JA (1996) Prevalent vertebral deformities: Relationship to bone mineral density and spinal osteophytosis in elderly men and women. Osteoporos Int 6:233–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lau EMC, Woo J, Chan H, Chan MKF, Griffith J, Chan YH et al (1998) The health consequences of vertebral deformity in elderly Chinese men and women. Calcif Tissue Int 63:1–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Melton LJ III, Lane AW, Cooper C, Eastell R, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL (1993) Prevalence and incidence of vertebral deformities. Osteoporos Int 3:113–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pluijm SM, Tromp AM, Smit JH, Deeg DJ, Lips P (2000) Consequences of vertebral deformities in older men and women. J Bone Miner Res 15:1564–1572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Silverman SL (1992). The clinical consequences of vertebral compression fracture. Bone 13 (Suppl 2):S27–31

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, Caulin F, Egger P, Johnell O et al (1999) Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures. Validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Osteoporos Int 10:150–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ross PD (1997) Clinical consequences of vertebral fractures. Am J Med 103:30S–42S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lips P, Agnusdei D, Caulin F, Cooper C, Johnell O, Kanis J et al (1996) The development of a European questionnaire for quality of life in patients with vertebral osteoporosis. Scand J Rheumatol (Suppl) 103:84–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, Caulin F, Egger P, Johnell O et al (1997) Quality of life as outcome in the treatment of osteoporosis: the development of a questionnaire for quality of life by the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 7:36–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hays RD, Morales LS, Reise SP (2000) Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care 38:28–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cella D, Chang CH (2000) A discussion of item response theory and its applications in health status assessment. Med Care 38:66–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Oleksik A, Lips P, Dawson A, Minshall ME, Shen W, Cooper C et al (2000) Health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women with low BMD with or without prevalent vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 15:1384–1392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1996) Prelis 2 User’s Reference Guide. Mooresville: SSI Scientific Software

  15. Flora DB, Finkel EJ, Foshee VA (2003) Higher order factor structure of a self-control test: Evidence from confirmatory factor analysis with polychoric correlations. Educ Psychol Meas 63:112–127

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Streiner DL (1994) Figuring out factors - the use and misuse of factor-analysis. Can J Psychiatry 39:135–140

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Muraki E (1992) A generalized partial credit model-application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement 16:159–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Glas CAW (1999) Modification indices for the 2–PL and the nominal response model. Psychometrika 64:273–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Glas CAW, Falcon JCS (2003) A comparison of item-fit statistics for the three–parameter logistic model. Applied Psychological Measurement 27:87–106

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. van Buuren S, Hopman-Rock M (2001) Revision of the ICIDH Severity of Disabilities Scale by data linking and item response theory. Stat Med 20:1061–1076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rasch G (1960) Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research

  22. Verhelst ND, Glas CAW, Verstralen HHFM (1995) One-Parameter Logistic Model OPLM. Arnhem: CITO

  23. Ware JE, Bjorner JB, Kosinski M (2000) Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing–A brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales. Med Care 38:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study is based on data from the Qualeffo validation study and the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene study. We would like to thank Susan Ewing for her advice. Natasja van Schoor was funded by a grant of Wyeth Research, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Lips.

Appendix

Appendix

Pain

The four questions in this section regard the situation in the last week.

Question 1 (1)

Possible response

How often have you had back pain in the last week?

Never

1 day per week or less

2–3 days per week

O 4–6 days per week

every day

Question 2 (2)

 

If you have had back pain, for how long did you have back pain in the daytime?

Never

1–2 hours

3–5 hours

6–10 hours

All day

Question 3 (3+4)

 

How severe is your back pain usually?

No back pain

Mild

Moderate

Severe

Unbearable

Question 4 (5)

 

Has the back pain disturbed your sleep in the last week?

Less than once per week

Once a week

Twice a week

Every other night

Every night

Physical function

The next 18 questions regard the present situation.

Question 1 (6)

Possible response

Do you have problems with dressing?

No difficulty

A little difficulty

Moderate difficulty

May need some help

Impossible without help

Question 2 (7)

 

Do you have problems with taking a bath or shower?

No difficulty

A little difficulty

Moderate difficulty

May need some help

Impossible without help

Question 3 (8)

 

Do you have problems with getting to or operating a toilet?

No difficulty

A little difficulty

Moderate difficulty

May need some help

Impossible without help

The next 5 questions also regard the present situation. If someone else does these things in your house, please answer as though you were responsible for them.

Question 4 (10)

 

Can you do the cleaning?

Without difficulty

With a little difficulty

With moderate difficulty

With great difficulty

Impossible

Question 5 (11)

 

Can you prepare meals?

Without difficulty

With a little difficulty

With moderate difficulty

With great difficulty

Impossible

Question 6 (12)

 

Can you wash the dishes?

Without difficulty

With a little difficulty

With moderate difficulty

With great difficulty

Impossible

Question 7 (13)

 

Can you do your day to day shopping?

Without difficulty

With a little difficulty

With moderate difficulty

With great difficulty

Impossible

Question 8 (14)

 

Can you lift a heavy object of 20 lb (e.g., a crate of 12 bottles of milk, or a one-year-old child) and carry it for at least 10 yards?

Without difficulty

With a little difficulty

With moderate difficulty

With great difficulty

Impossible

Question 9 (15)

 

Can you get up from a chair?

Without difficulty

With a little difficulty

With moderate difficulty

With great difficulty

Only with help

Question 10 (16)

 

Can you bend down?

Easily

Fairly easily

Moderately

Very little

Impossible

Question 11 (17)

 

Can you kneel down?

Easily

Fairly easily

Moderately

Very little

O Impossible

Question 12 (18)

 

Can you climb stairs to the next floor of a house?

Without difficulty

With a little difficulty

With at least one rest

With help only

Impossible

Question 13 (19)

 

Can you walk 100 yards?

Fast without stopping

Slowly without stopping

Slowly with at least one stop

Only with help

Impossible

Question 14 (20)

 

How often have you been outside in the last week?

Every day

5–6 days/week

3–4 days/week

1–2 days/week

Less than once/week

Question 15 (21)

 

Can you use public transport?

Without difficulty

With a little difficulty

With moderate difficulty

With great difficulty

Only with help

Question 16 (24)

 

Can you do your gardening?

Yes

Yes with restrictions

Not at all

Not applicable

Question 17 (26)

 

Can you visit a cinema, theatre, etc.?

Yes

Yes with restrictions

Not at all

No cinema, or theatre within a reasonable distance

Question 18 (27)

 

How often did you visit friends or relatives during the last 3 months?

Once a week or more

Once or twice a month

Less than once a month

Never

Mental function

The next 9 questions regard the situation in the last week.

Question 1 (31)

Possible response

How would you rate your overall quality of life during the last week?

Excellent

Good

Satisfactory

Fair

Poor

Question 2 (33)

 

Do you tend to feel tired?

In the morning

In the afternoon

O Only in the evening

After strenuous activity

Almost never

Question 3 (34)

 

Do you feel downhearted?

Almost every day

Three to five days a week

One or two days a week

O Once in a while

Almost never

Question 4 (35)

 

Do you feel lonely?

Almost every day

Three to five days a week

One or two days a week

Once in a while

Almost never

Question 5 (36)

 

Do you feel full of energy?

Almost every day

Three to five days a week

O One or two days a week

O Once in a while

Almost never

Question 6 (37)

 

Are you hopeful about your future?

Never

Rarely

Sometimes

O Quite often

Always

Question 7 (38)

 

Do you get upset over little things?

Never

Rarely

Sometimes

O Quite often

Always

Question 8 (39)

 

Do you find it easy to make contact with people?

O Never

Rarely

Sometimes

O Quite often

Always

Question 9 (40)

 

Are you in good spirits most of the day?

Never

Rarely

Sometimes

Quite often

Always

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Schoor, N.M., Knol, D.L., Glas, C.A.W. et al. Development of the Qualeffo–31, an osteoporosis-specific quality-of-life questionnaire. Osteoporos Int 17, 543–551 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-0024-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-0024-7

Keywords

Navigation