Skip to main content
Log in

A population-based study of osteoporosis testing and treatment following introduction of a new bone densitometry service

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 04 May 2006

Abstract

Bone density measurement plays a key role in the initial diagnostic assessment of osteoporosis and in targeting pharmacologic therapies. The impact of access to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) on physician prescribing habits is unclear, however. We were able to directly evaluate the change in physician osteoporosis testing and prescribing following introduction of a DXA testing service in a geographic region that had previously had very limited access. This evaluation was conducted in the province of Manitoba, Canada, which has a provincially based bone density testing program and maintains a population-based bone density database that can be linked with administrative health data sources including drug prescriptions. The province of Manitoba was geographically partitioned into the urban and rural health regions serviced by the new program (urbannew and ruralnew) and the remaining urban and rural health regions which had relatively unchanged DXA access during this period (urbancontrol and ruralcontrol). Regression models of DXA testing rates and osteoporosis prescription rates were created for all older women in these regions. There was a statistically significant increase in bone density testing and BMD-guided osteoporosis treatment in the urbannew and ruralnew regions following introduction of the DXA testing service, relative to the control regions. Although the overall rate of empiric postfracture and preventive osteoporosis treatment did not show a specific region effect, when analysis was limited to nonhormonal agents there was a significant reduction in preventive and empiric postfracture treatment in some subgroups of women. These results suggest that the local availability of the bone density testing service led to an increase in objective test-guided therapy with some reduction in the use of empiric and preventive strategies and had a neutral effect on overall use of these agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cranney A, Guyatt G, Griffith L, Wells G, Tugwell P, Rosen C (2002) Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis, IX: summary of meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 23(4):570–578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leslie W D (2004) Impact of establishing a Brandon bone densitometry program. In: Finlayson G, Leslie WD, MacWilliam L (eds) Diagnostic imaging data in Manitoba: assessment and applications. Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Manitoba (in press)

  3. Leslie WD, Metge C (2003) Establishing a regional bone density program: lessons from the Manitoba experience. J Clin Densitom 6(3):275–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Roos NP, Shapiro E (1999) Revisiting the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation and its population-based health information system. Med Care 37[Suppl 6]:JS10–JS14

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roos LL, Mustard CA, Nicol JP, McLerran DF, Malenka DJ, Young TK, Cohen MM (1993) Registries and administrative data: organization and accuracy. Med Care 31(3):201–212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roos LL, Sharp SM, Wajda A (1989) Assessing data quality: a computerized approach. Soc Sci Med 28(2):175–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roos LL, Walld RK, Romano PS, Roberecki S (1996) Short-term mortality after repair of hip fracture: do Manitoba elderly do worse? Med Care 34(4):310–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Metge C, Black C, Peterson S, Kozyrskyj AL (1999) The population’s use of pharmaceuticals. Med Care 37[Suppl 6]:JS42–JS59

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jaglal SB, McIsaac WJ, Hawker G, Jaakkimainen L, Cadarette SM, Chan BT (2000) Patterns of use of the bone mineral density test in Ontario, 1992–1998. CMAJ 163(9):1139–1143

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maitino AJ, Levin DC, Parker L, Rao VM, Sunshine JH (2003) Nationwide trends in rates of utilization of noninvasive diagnostic imaging among the Medicare population between 1993 and 1999. Radiology 227(1):113–117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kanis JA (1998) Are oestrogen deficiency and hormone replacement a distraction to the field of osteoporosis? Osteoporos Int 8[Suppl 1]:S51–S56

  12. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, Jackson RD, Beresford SA, Howard BV, Johnson KC, Kotchen JM, Ockene J (2002) Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288(3):321–333

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Juby AG, Geus-Wenceslau CM (2002) Evaluation of osteoporosis treatment in seniors after hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 13(3):205–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Feldstein AC, Nichols GA, Elmer PJ, Smith DH, Aickin M, Herson M (2003) Older women with fractures: patients falling through the cracks of guideline-recommended osteoporosis screening and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(12):2294–2302

  15. Feldstein A, Elmer PJ, Orwoll E, Herson M, Hillier T (2003) Bone mineral density measurement and treatment for osteoporosis in older individuals with fractures: a gap in evidence-based practice guideline implementation. Arch Intern Med 163(18):2165–2172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnell O, Jonsson B, Jonsson L, Black D (2003) Cost effectiveness of alendronate (fosamax) for the treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of fractures. Pharmacoeconomics 21(5):305–314

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Phillipov G, Mos E, Scinto S, Phillips PJ (1997) Initiation of hormone replacement therapy after diagnosis of osteoporosis by bone densitometry. Osteoporos Int 7(2):162–164

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rolnick SJ, Kopher R, Jackson J, Fischer LR, Compo R (2001) What is the impact of osteoporosis education and bone mineral density testing for postmenopausal women in a managed care setting? Menopause 8(2):141–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pressman A, Forsyth B, Ettinger B, Tosteson AN (2001) Initiation of osteoporosis treatment after bone mineral density testing. Osteoporos Int 12(5):337–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fitt NS, Mitchell SL, Cranney A, Gulenchyn K, Huang M, Tugwell P (2001) Influence of bone densitometry results on the treatment of osteoporosis. CMAJ 20;164(6):777–781

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Health Information Services at Manitoba Health for providing data. The results and conclusions are those of the authors, and no official endorsement by Manitoba Health is intended or should be inferred. This article has been reviewed and approved by the members of the Manitoba Bone Density Program Committee. The authors and Committee would like to express their gratitude to Manitoba Health, the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority, and the Brandon Regional Health Authority for their vision, trust, and support in the establishment of this program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William D. Leslie.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0140-z.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leslie, W.D., MacWilliam, L., Lix, L. et al. A population-based study of osteoporosis testing and treatment following introduction of a new bone densitometry service. Osteoporos Int 16, 773–782 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1756-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1756-5

Keywords

Navigation