Osteoporosis International

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 128–133 | Cite as

Awareness of osteoporotic patients

  • Yeşim Gökçe Kutsal
  • Ayçe AtalayEmail author
  • Şule Arslan
  • Aynur Başaran
  • Ferhan Cantürk
  • Abdullah Cindaş
  • Merih Eryavuz
  • Jale İrdesel
  • Kıymet İkbal Karadavut
  • Yeşim Kirazlı
  • Dilşad Sindel
  • Kazım Şenel
  • Füsun Güler-Uysal
  • Kadir Yıldırım
Original Article


Osteoporosis has recently been recognized as a major public health problem by some governments and health care providers. Despite significant progress in knowledge about osteoporosis, public awareness is required for effective management if precautions are to be taken. The aim of this study was to evaluate the educational status of osteoporotic individuals, and their awareness about the disease and sources of information. We also aimed to compare the variables between the geographical regions of the country, since significant differences exist in socioeconomic status and lifestyle within the same cultural context. This multicenter study was carried out in eight cities located in six different geographical regions between September 2001 and January 2002. To our knowledge, this is the first multicenter study in Turkey evaluating the relationship between awareness of osteoporotic patients and other variables such as educational level and economic factors. Ten centers took part in this study and consecutive patients with either femoral or lumbar T-scores below −2.5 SD were enrolled into the study group. Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Patients were interviewed using a questionnaire on past medical history, education, awareness about their disease and risk factors for osteoporosis. A total of 540 women (93.8%) and 36 men (6.3%) were included in the study. Fifty-four percent of patients declared that they were aware of osteoporosis. With regard to sources of information, 56.8% of patients reported physicians as the main source of information. Awareness of the patients was negatively correlated with age (P=0.025, r=−0,94) but positively correlated with education (P=0.0001, r=0.327), level of physical activity (P=0.001, r=143), calcium intake (P=0.005, r=119) and modern clothing style (P=0.0001, r=309). Educational status of the patients was negatively correlated with BMI (P=0.0001, r=−283) and positively correlated with physical activity (P=0.0001, r=268), modern clothing style (P=0.0001, r=600) and smoking (P=0.0001, r=273). Regional comparison of female patients demonstrated that significant differences exist in terms of educational status, clothing style, smoking, level of physical activity, calcium intake, and knowledge about osteoporosis. As a result, education has profound effects on awareness about osteoporosis and many aspects of human behavior, such as calcium intake, physical activity, clothing style and smoking. Significant disparities may be observed between the geographical regions of the same country.


Awareness Education Geographical regions Osteoporosis 


  1. 1.
    Compston JE, Papapoulos SE, Blanchard F (1998) Report on osteoporosis in the European community: current status and recommendations for the future. Osteoporos Int 8:531–534CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gabriel SE, Tosteson ANA, Leibson CL et al. (2002) Direct medical costs attributable to osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 13:323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Magnus JH, Joakimsen RM, Berntsen GK et al. (1996) What do Norwegian women and men know about osteoporosis? Osteoporos Int 6:31–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    WHO Study Group (1994) Osteoporosis. In: Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Technical report series 843, WHO, Geneva, pp 2–7Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    WHO Study Group (1996) Methods of measuring bone density and predicting fracture risk. In: Research on the menopause in the 1990’s. Technical report series 866, WHO, Geneva, pp 44–47Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Varenna M, Binelli L, Zucchi F et al. (1999) Prevalence of osteoporosis by educational level in a cohort of postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 9:236–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    www.tbb.gen.trGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pincus T, Callahan LF, Burkhauser RV (1987) Most chronic diseases are reported more frequently by individuals with fewer than 12 years of formal education in the age 18–64 United States population. J Chron Dis 40:865–874CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lahelma E, Valkonen T (1990) Health and social inequities in Finland and elsewhere. Soc Sci Med 31:257–265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garton M, Reid D, Rennie E (1995) The climacteric, osteoporosis and hormone replacement; views of women aged 45–49. Maturitas 21:7–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Juby AG, Davis P (2001) A prospective evaluation of the awareness, knowledge, risk factors and current treatment of osteoporosis in a cohort of elderly subjects. Osteoporos Int 12:617–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    La Vecchia C, Decarli A, Pagano R (1986) Education and prevalence of smoking in Italian men and women. Int J Epidemiol 15:279PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13. Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ford ES, Merritt RK, Heath GW et al. (1991) Physical activity behaviors in lower and higher socioeconomic status populations. Am J Epidemiol 133:1246–1256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    İnanıcı-Ersöz F, Gökçe-Kutsal Y, Öncel S et al. (2002) A multicenter, case control study of risk factors for low tibial speed of sound among residents of urban areas in Turkey. Rheumatol Int 22:20–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Phillipov G, Phillips PJ, Leach G et al. (1998) Public perceptions and self-reported prevalence of osteoporosis in south Australia. Osteoporos Int 8:552–556CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Colditz GA, Martin P, Stampfer MJ et al. (1986) Validation of questionnaire information on risk factors and disease outcomes in a prospective cohort study of women. Am J Epidemiol 123:894–900PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    La Vecchia C, Negri E, Pagano R et al. (1987) Education, prevalence of disease and frequency of health care utilisation. J Epidemiol Commun Health 41:161–165Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tellier V, De Maeseneer J, De Prins L et al. (2001) Intensive and prolonged health promotion strategy may increase awareness of osteoporosis among postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 12:131–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hamerman D (2000) Considerations of osteoporosis in an aging society. Maturitas 37:69–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taylor JC, Sterkel B, Utley M et al. (2001) Opinions and experiences in general practice on osteoporosis diagnosis and management. Osteoporos Int 12:844–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yeşim Gökçe Kutsal
    • 1
  • Ayçe Atalay
    • 1
    • 12
    Email author
  • Şule Arslan
    • 2
  • Aynur Başaran
    • 3
  • Ferhan Cantürk
    • 4
  • Abdullah Cindaş
    • 5
  • Merih Eryavuz
    • 6
  • Jale İrdesel
    • 7
  • Kıymet İkbal Karadavut
    • 3
  • Yeşim Kirazlı
    • 8
  • Dilşad Sindel
    • 9
  • Kazım Şenel
    • 10
  • Füsun Güler-Uysal
    • 11
  • Kadir Yıldırım
    • 10
  1. 1.Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of MedicineHacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of MedicineGaziosmanpaşa UniversityTokatTurkey
  3. 3.Clinic of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationSSK Ankara Educational HospitalAnkaraTurkey
  4. 4.Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine19 Mayıs UniversitySamsunTurkey
  5. 5.Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of MedicineSüleyman Demirel UniversityIspartaTurkey
  6. 6.Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicineİstanbul UniversityİstanbulTurkey
  7. 7.Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of MedicineUludağ UniversityBursaTurkey
  8. 8.Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of MedicineEge UniversityİzmirTurkey
  9. 9.Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine İstanbul UniversityİstanbulTurkey
  10. 10.Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of MedicineAtatürk UniversityErzurumTurkey
  11. 11.Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of MedicineÇukurova UniversityAdanaTurkey
  12. 12.16. sokakAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations