1 Anonymous WHO Study Group (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for post-menopausal osteoporosis. WHO, Geneva
2 Faulkner KG, Roberts LA, McClung MR (1996) Discrepancies in normative data between lunar and hologic DXA systems. Osteoporos Int 6:432–436
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
3 Genant HK, Grman ME, Hangartner T, et al (1995) Standardisation of measurements for assessing BMD by DXA. Calcif Tissue Int 57:469
PubMed
Google Scholar
4 Hanson J (1997) Standardisation of femur BMD. J Bone Miner Res 12:1316–1317
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
5 Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, et al (1995) Proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 5:389–409
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
6 Faulker KG, von Stetten E, Steiger P, et al (1998) Discrepancies in osteoporosis prevalence at different skeletal sites: impact on the WHO criteria. Bone 23: s194
Google Scholar
7 Hans D, Schott A-M, Dargent-Molina P, et al (1998) Is the WHO criteria applicable to quantitative ultrasound measurement? The EPIDOS prospective study. Bone 23:s238
Google Scholar
8 Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I (2000) Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound? Osteoporos Int 11:321–330
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
9 Ish-Shalom S, Yaniv I, Singal C, et al (1999) Can the WHO osteoporosis criteria be applied to ultrasound measurements? 11th International Workshop on Calcified Tissues. Abstracts:34
10 Delmas PD (2000) Do we need to change the WHO definition of osteoporosis? Osteoporos Int 11:189–191
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
11 Barkmann R, Kantorovich E, Singal C, et al (2000) A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites. J Clin Densitom 3:1–7
Google Scholar
12 Sunlight Ultrasound Technologies Ltd (1998) Sunlight Omnisense User Manual
13 Ryan PJ, Blake GM, Fogelman I (1992) Post-menopausal screening for osteopenia. Br J Rheumatol 31:823–828
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
14 Knapp KM, Blake GM, Spector TD, et al (2001) Multisite quantitative ultrasound: precision, age- and menopause-related changes, fracture discrimination, and T-score equivalence with dual energy absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 12:456–464
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
15 Weiss M, Ben-Shlomo A, Hagag P, et al (2000) Reference database for bone speed of sound measurements by a novel quantitative multi-site ultrasound device. Osteoporos Int 11:688–696
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
16 Dennison E, Eastell R, Fall CHD, et al (1999) Determinants of bone loss in elderly men and women: a prospective population-based study. Osteoporos Int 10:384–391
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
17 Kontulainen S, Kannus P, Haapasalo H, et al (2001) Good maintenance of exercise-induced bone gain with decreased training of female tennis and squash players: a prospective 5-year follow-up study of young and old starters and controls. J Bone Miner Res 16:195–201
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
18 Maddalozzo GF, Snow CM (2000) High intensity resistance training: effects on bone in older men and women. Calcif Tissue Int 66:399–404
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
19 Coupland CAC, Grainge MJ, Cliffe SJ, et al (2000) Occupational activity and bone mineral density in post-menopausal women in England. Osteoporos Int 11:310–315
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
20 Mulder JE, Michaeli D, Flaster ER, et al (2000) Comparison of bone mineral density of the phalanges, lumbar spine, hip and forearm for assessment of osteoporosis in post-menopausal women. J Clin Densitom 3:373–381
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
21 Gürlek A, Bayraktar M, Ariyurek M (2000) Inappropriate reference range for peak bone mineral density in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: implications for the interpretation of T-score. Osteoporos Int 11:809–813
PubMed
Google Scholar
22 Kim K II, Han I-K, Kim H, et al (2001) How reliable is the ultrasound densitometer for community screening to diagnose osteoporosis in spine, femur and forearm? J Clin Densitom 4:159–165
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
23 Woodson G (2000) Dual X-ray absorptiometry T-score concordance and discordance between hip and spine measurement sites. J Clin Densitom 3:319–324
Google Scholar
24 Melton LJ (1995) How many women have osteoporosis now? J Bone Miner Res 10:175–177
PubMed
Google Scholar
25 Looker AC, Orwell ES, Johnston CC Jr, et al (1997) Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older US adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 12:1761–1768
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
26 Ballard PA, Purdie DW, Langton CM, et al (1998) Prevalence of osteoporosis and related risk factors in UK women in the seventh decade: osteoporosis case finding by clinical referral criteria or predictive model? Osteoporos Int 8:535–539
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
27 Ahmed AIH, Ilic D, Blake GM, et al (1998) Review of 3,530 referrals for bone density measurements of spine and femur: evidence that radiographic osteopenia predicts low bone mass. Radiology 207:619–624
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
28 Meyer HE, Tverdal A, Falch JA, et al (2000) Factors associated with mortality after hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 11:228–232
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
29 National Osteoporosis Society (2001). Position statement on the use of quantitative ultrasound in the management of osteoporosis. NOS, UK
30 Ryan PJ, Spector TD, Blake GM, et al (1993) A comparison of reference bone mineral density measurements derived from two sources: referred and population based. Br J Radiol 66:1138–1141
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
31 Andrew T, Hart DJ, Sneider H, de Lange M, et al (2001) Are twins and singletons comparable? A study of disease-related and lifestyle characteristics in adult women. Twin Res 4:464–77
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
32 Black D, Nevitt M, Palermo L, et al (1993) Prediction of new vertebral deformities. J Bone Miner Res 8 [Suppl 1]:S135
33 Melton LJ (1993)Long-term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessment at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 8:1227–1233
PubMed
Google Scholar
34 Blake GM (2001) Peripheral or central densitometry: does it matter which technique we use? J Clin Densitom 4:83–96
CAS
Google Scholar