Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of matched historical controls to evaluate the anti-fracture efficacy of once-a-week risedronate

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Placebo controls are essential to assess anti-fracture efficacy of new osteoporosis therapies, but inclusion of a placebo arm in a subsequent clinical trial may be limited by practical or ethical considerations; in these cases, use of an historical control may be appropriate. A recent active-controlled study of risedronate 35 mg once a week demonstrated that this regimen produces increases in bone mineral density (BMD) that are comparable to those seen with the risedronate 5 mg daily dose, which has proven anti-fracture efficacy. To assess the anti-fracture efficacy of this new regimen, we have analyzed the fracture data collected in an active controlled study of risedronate dosing regimens (the Once-a-Week study) using matched historical control data from previous placebo-controlled trials. Women in the Once-a-Week study were matched for age, years since menopause, BMD, and prevalent vertebral fracture status, with placebo patients in the Vertebral Efficacy of Risedronate Therapy (VERT) trials forming an historical placebo group. We also constructed an historical active treatment group from the 5 mg daily arm of the VERT trials for comparison with the 5 mg daily and 35 mg once weekly treatment groups in the Once-a-Week study. Data were obtained from the risedronate 5 mg daily group (n=480) and 35 mg once-a-week group (n=485) in the Once-a-Week study and historical control groups representing daily placebo patients (n=114, matched from 993) and risedronate 5 mg daily patients (n=120; matched from 990) in the VERT studies. Patients received calcium supplementation (1000 mg daily); vitamin D was given if baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were low. Over 1 year, new vertebral fracture risk in the 35 mg once-a-week group was reduced by 77% relative to the historical placebo group (1.2% versus 5.0%; RR 0.23; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.91, P=0.018), similar to the 1-year risk reduction observed in the VERT trials of risedronate 5 mg daily (61–65%). The incidence of new vertebral fractures in the three active treatment groups was similar: 1.7% in the historical risedronate 5 mg group, 1.5% in the risedronate 5 mg daily group from the Once-a-Week study, and 1.2% in the 35 mg once-a-week group. Risedronate 35 mg once a week appears as effective as the 5 mg daily dose in reducing the risk of new vertebral fractures in the first year of treatment. The use of appropriate historical control data provides an approach to the assessment of fracture effects in osteoporosis trials for which placebo-controlled data are not available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harris ST, Watts NB, Genant HK et al. (1999) Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 282:1344–1352

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reginster J, Minne HW, Sorensen OH et al. (2000) Randomized trial of the effects of risedronate on vertebral fractures in women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 11:83–91

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen S, Levy RM, Keller M et al. (1999) Risedronate therapy prevents corticosteroid-induced bone loss. Arthr Rheum 42:2309–2318

    Google Scholar 

  4. Reid DM, Hughes RA, Laan R et al. (2000) Efficacy and safety of daily risedronate in the treatment of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis in men and women: a randomized trial. J Bone Miner Res 15:1006–1013

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wallach S, Cohen S, Reid DM et al. (2000) Effects of risedronate treatment on bone density and vertebral fracture in patients on corticosteroid therapy. Calcif Tissue Int 67:277–285

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown J, Kendler D, McClung MR et al. (2002) The efficacy and tolerability of risedronate once a week for the treatment of osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 71:103–111

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cleophas TJ, Zwinderman AH (2000) Limitations of randomized clinical trials. Proposed alternative designs. Clin Chem Lab Med 38:1217–1223

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosner F (1987) The ethics of randomized clinical trials. Am J Med 82:283–290

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson ED et al. (1998) Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures. Results from the Fracture Intervention Trial. JAMA 280:2077–2082

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ettinger B, Black DM, Mitlak BH et al. (1999) Reduction in vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene. Results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. JAMA 282:637–645

    Google Scholar 

  11. Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB et al. (1996) Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Lancet 348:1535–1541

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chesnut CH, III, Silverman S, Andriano K et al. (2000) A randomized trial of nasal spray salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis: the Prevent Recurrence of Osteoporotic Fractures Study. Am J Med 109:267–276

  13. Gehan EA (1984) The evaluation of therapies: historical control studies. Stat Med 3:315–324

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pocock SJ (1976) The combination of randomized and historical controls in clinical trials. J Chron Dis 29:175–188

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

These studies were supported by grants from Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio, and Aventis Pharma, Bridgewater, New Jersey. The authors acknowledge Michael Meredith and Lisa Bosch for assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nelson B. Watts.

Additional information

Employees of Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio, and Aventis Pharma, Bridgewater, New Jersey, participated in the designs of these studies, the analysis of the data, and in the preparation of the manuscript. The authors had full access to the data and analyses. N.B.W., as lead author, made the decision concerning where to submit the paper, and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watts, N.B., Lindsay, R., Li, Z. et al. Use of matched historical controls to evaluate the anti-fracture efficacy of once-a-week risedronate. Osteoporos Int 14, 437–441 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1401-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1401-8

Keywords

Navigation