Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic polymorphisms and phylogenetic analysis of the Gujarat population via 17 Y chromosomal STR systems

Genetische Polymorphismen und phylogenetische Analyse der Bevölkerung von Gujarat anhand von 17 Y-chromosomalen STR-Systemen

  • Original reports
  • Published:
Rechtsmedizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analysis of Y‑STRs provides valuable information in forensic casework as well as in population studies. In order to observe the genetic polymorphism of the Gujarat population, 150 unrelated male individuals were typed using 17 Y‑STR markers (DYS456, DYS389I, DYS390, DYS389II, DYS458, DYS19, DYS385a/b, DYS393, DYS391, DYS439, DYS635, DYS392, Y‑GATA-H4, DYS437, DYS438, and DYS448). A total of 120 distinct alleles were reported with an allelic frequency ranging from 0.007 to 0.533. The studied population showed higher value of discrimination capacity (0.9726) and haplotype diversity (0.9998). A total of 146 haplotypes were observed among which 142 haplotypes were unique. The genetic diversity for 17 Y-STRs ranged from 0.620 (DYS391) to 0.829 (DYS385b). The locus DYS385b showed the highest polymorphism (0.809). Using the same 17 Y-STR loci, genetic relationship and the corresponding p-value were calculated and compared with the other available Indian populations. In addition, a phylogenetic tree was also constructed and similar results were evidenced using multidimensional scaling (MDS) plot. Overall, these findings are highly polymorphic in the studied population and can also enrich the ethnic genetic information of Gujaratis.

Zusammenfassung

Die Y‑STR-Analyse liefert wertvolle Informationen für die forensische Fallbearbeitung und für Bevölkerungsstudien. Um den genetischen Polymorphismus der Bevölkerung von Gujarat zu beobachten, wurden 150 nichtverwandte männliche Individuen mit 17 Y‑STR-Markern (DYS456, DYS389I, DYS390, DYS389II, DYS458, DYS19, DYS385a/b, DYS393, DYS391, DYS439, DYS635, DYS392, Y‑GATA-H4, DYS437, DYS438 und DYS448) typisiert. Insgesamt wurden 120 unterschiedliche Allele gemeldet, die zwischen 0,007 und 0,533 liegen. Die untersuchte Population wies höhere Werte für die Unterscheidungsfähigkeit (0,9726) und die Haplotypenvielfalt (0,9998) auf. Insgesamt wurden 146 Haplotypen beobachtet, von denen 142 einzigartig waren. Die genetische Vielfalt für 17 Y-STR reichte von 0,620 (DYS391) bis 0,829 (DYS385b). Der Locus DYS385b zeigte den höchsten Polymorphismus (0,809). Anhand der gleichen 17 Y-STR-Loci wurden die genetische Verwandtschaft und der entsprechende p-Wert berechnet und mit den anderen verfügbaren indischen Populationen verglichen. Darüber hinaus wurde ein phylogenetischer Baum erstellt, der auch mit Hilfe der multidimensionalen Skalierung (MDS) dargestellt wurde. Insgesamt sind diese Ergebnisse in der untersuchten Population sehr polymorph und können auch die ethnisch-genetischen Informationen der Gujaratis bereichern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Corach D, Risso LF, Marino M, Penacino G, Sala A (2001) Routine Y‑STR typing in forensic casework. Forensic Sci Int 118(2–3):131–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kayser M (2017) Forensic use of Y‑chromosome DNA: a general overview. Hum Genet 136(5):621–635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar N, Maitray A, Gupta R (2018) Importance of Y‑STR profiling in sexual assault cases with mixed DNA profile. Int J Mol Biol Open Access 3(1):48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Roewer L (2019) Y‑chromosome short tandem repeats in forensics—sexing, profiling, and matching male DNA. WIREs Forens Sci 1(4):e1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnaud CH (2017) Thirty years of DNA forensics: how DNA has revolutionized criminal investigations. Chem Eng News 95:16

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen H, Lu Y, Lu D, Xu S (2021) Y‑LineageTracker: a high-throughput analysis framework for Y‑chromosomal next-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 22(1):114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mishra A, Dixit S, Choudhary SK, Sharma H, Shrivastava P (2019) Forensic genetic analysis of the population of Gujarat with PowerPlex 21 multiplex system. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser 7(1):167–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubut V, Cartault F, Gilles A, Thionville M‑D, Murail P (2009) Genetic data analysis of 10 Y‑STR loci in two ethnic groups of Asian ancestry (Gujarat and Guangdong-Fujian provinces) from Reunion Island (Indian Ocean). Leg Med 11(2):104–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chaudhari RR, Dahiya M (2014) Genetic diversity of 15 autosomal short tandem repeats loci using the AmpFLSTR® IdentifilerTM kit in a Bhil Tribe Population from Gujarat state, India. Indian J Hum Genet 20(2):148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma S, Rai E, Sharma P, Jena M, Singh S, Darvishi K et al (2009) The Indian origin of paternal haplogroup R1a1* substantiates the autochthonous origin of Brahmins and the caste system. J Hum Genet 54(1):47–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rickham PP (1964) Human experimentation. Code of ethics of the world medical association. Declaration of Helsinki. Br Med J 2(5402):177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gouy A, Zieger M (2017) STRAF—a convenient online tool for STR data evaluation in forensic genetics. Forensic Sci Int Genet 30:148–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Eliades N, Eliades D (2009) Haplotype analysis: software for analysis of haplotype data. Georg-August University Goettingen, Goettingen https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19029.93922

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Roewer L, Kayser M, Dieltjes P, Nagy M, Bakker E, Krawczak M et al (1996) Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of Y‑chromosome-specific microsatellites in two closely related human populations. Hum Mol Genet 5(7):1029–1033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Caspermeyer J (2018) MEGA software celebrates silver anniversary. Mol Biol Evol 35(6):1558–1560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sahoo S, Samal R, Behera S, Biswas S, Dixit S, Kumawat R et al (2021) Genomic insight into Y‑STR diversity in the population of Odisha, India. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-021-02545-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Imam J, Reyaz R, Singh RS, Bapuly AK, Shrivastava P (2018) Genomic portrait of population of Jharkhand, India, drawn with 15 autosomal STRs and 17 Y‑STRs. Int J Legal Med 132(1):139–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh M, Sarkar A, Nandineni MR (2018) A comprehensive portrait of Y‑STR diversity of Indian populations and comparison with 129 worldwide populations. Sci Rep 8(1):15421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mohapatra B, Chauhan K, Shrivastava P, Sharma A, Dagar S, Kaitholia K (2019) Haplotype data for 17 Y‑STR loci in the population of Himachal Pradesh, India. Int J Legal Med 133(5):1401–1402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Roy S, Noor S, Haque I (2012) Genetic analysis of 17 Y‑chromosomal STRs haplotypes of three ethnic groups residing in West Bengal, India. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6(1):e5–e7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghosh T, Kalpana D, Mukerjee S, Mukherjee M, Sharma AK, Nath S et al (2011) Genetic diversity of 17 Y‑short tandem repeats in Indian population. Forensic Sci Int Genet 5(4):363–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to acknowledge all the participants for this study.

Author Contribution

A. Mishra and S. Misra planned the study. A. Mishra and U. Gondhali wrote the manuscript. S. Misra reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Availability of data and material

With corresponding author A. Mishra on request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aditi Mishra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

A. Mishra, S. Misra and U. Gondhali declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants or on human tissue were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

figure qr

Scan QR code & read article online

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, A., Misra, S. & Gondhali, U. Genetic polymorphisms and phylogenetic analysis of the Gujarat population via 17 Y chromosomal STR systems. Rechtsmedizin 32, 184–190 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-021-00529-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-021-00529-x

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation