Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comment on “On stability of strong and weak reflected shocks” by S. Mölder, E.V. Timofeev, C.G. Dunham, S. McKinley and P.A. Voinovich

  • Comment
  • Published:
Shock Waves Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

An incorrect and misleading conclusion regarding the stability of a strong regular reflection that was forwarded recently by Mölder et al. (2000) has been pointed out and corrected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pearlstone Center for Aeronautical Engineering Studies, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel , , , , , , IL

    G. Ben-Dor

Authors
  1. G. Ben-Dor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Received 27 April 2001 / Accepted 21 September 2001 Shock Waves (2000) 10: 389–393

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ben-Dor, G. Comment on “On stability of strong and weak reflected shocks” by S. Mölder, E.V. Timofeev, C.G. Dunham, S. McKinley and P.A. Voinovich. Shock Waves 11, 327–328 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001930100110

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001930100110

Keywords

Search

Navigation