Skip to main content
Log in

Blast pressures and waveforms of consumer firecrackers

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Shock Waves Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current methods for testing blast pressures produced by fireworks are ad hoc and differ substantially from established methods for assessing injury risks from explosives. In this experimental study, pressure-versus-time waveforms were measured as a function of distance from the source for four consumer firecrackers and one consumer bottle rocket. Pressure-versus-time data were collected at 10 MHz using a piezoelectric blast pressure sensor at distances 75 mm, 150 mm, 225 mm, and 300 mm from the source. While large variations in peak pressure were observed, in some trials, peak blast pressures over 100 kPa were observed, which suggests a risk of primary blast injury. The results support analysis of pressure waves produced by consumer firecrackers using established methods to quantify blast waves and to evaluate the risk of primary blast injury by comparing peak pressure and positive pulse duration to injury thresholds for specific body systems. Similar methods can be applied to result in comparable measurements for other firework devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. There are several products that use the name “Silver Salute”; for example, it is a nickname for an M-100 explosive device, which exceeds the explosive mixture limit for consumer fireworks and is not a 1.4 G class product (https://www.atf.gov/resource-center/fact-sheet/fact-sheet-illegal-explosive-devices, accessed September 1, 2020). The small consumer firework brand tested here appears to have used the name for marketing purposes.

References

  1. BBC News, 31 July, 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-asia-china-49181914 (2019). Accessed 19 September 2020

  2. Shepherd, K.: Another Portland protest ended with tear gas after police declare a riot. Washington Post, August 13, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/08/13/portland-riot-tear-gas/. Accessed 24 August 2020

  3. Tandon, R., Agrawal, K., Narayan, R.P., Tiwari, V.K., Prakash, V., Kumar, S., Sharma, S.: Firecracker injuries during Diwali festival: the epidemiology and impact of legislation in Delhi. Indian J. Plast. Surg. 45(1), 97–101 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.96595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Yperen, D.T., Van der Vlies, C.H., De Faber, J.T., Smit, X., Polinder, S., Penders, C.J., Van Lieshout, E.M., Verhofstad, M.H.: ROCKET study group. Epidemiology, treatment, costs, and long-term outcomes of patients with fireworks-related injuries (ROCKET): a multicenter prospective observational case series. PloS ONE 15(3), e0230382 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, C., Zhao, R., Du, W.L., Ning, F.G., Zhang, G.A.: Firework injuries at a major trauma and burn center: a five-year prospective study. Burns 40(2), 305–310 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2013.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Marier, A., Tu, Y., Lee, S.: 2019 Fireworks annual report. Fireworks-related deaths, emergency department-treated injuries, and enforcement activities during 2019. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (2020)

  7. Musto, C.J., Lock, A.: Fireworks safety standards development project FY 2013 status report. U.S, Consumer Product Safety Commission (2013)

  8. Martín-Alberca, C., García-Ruiz, C.: Analytical techniques for the analysis of consumer fireworks. Trends Anal. Chem. 56, 27–36 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2013.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. United States Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC Regulations on Fireworks and Firecrackers. Release number 76-081 (1976)

  10. Settles, G.S., Brandt, A.D., Miller, J.D.: Full-scale schlieren imaging of shock waves for aviation security research. In: Carlomagno, G. (ed.) Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Flow Visualization, Sorrento, Italy (1998)

  11. Ward, W.D., Glorig, A.: A case of firecracker-induced hearing loss. Laryngoscope 71(12), 1590–1596 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-196112000-00020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirsch, A.E., Ommaya, A.K.: Head injury caused by underwater explosion of a firecracker: case report. J. Neurosurg. 37(1), 95–99 (1972). https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1972.37.1.0095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Flamme, G.A., Liebe, K., Wong, A.: Estimates of the auditory risk from outdoor impulse noise I: Firecrackers. Noise Health 11(45), 223–230 (2009). https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.56216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alphonse, V.D., Kemper, A.R.: Evaluation of eye injury risk from consumer fireworks. Brain Injuries and Biomechanics Symposium, Washington, D.C. (2013)

  15. Weitzel, W.R.: Evaluation of overpressure wave transition by airblast overpressure and shock wave attenuation analysis using a small black powder charge. Master’s Thesis, University of Kentucky, Mining Engineering, Paper 17 (2014)

  16. Loubeau, A., Sparrow, V.W., Pater, L.L., Wright, W.M.: High-frequency measurements of blast wave propagation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120(3), 29–35 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2234518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Courtney, M.W., Courtney, A.C.: Working toward exposure thresholds for blast-induced traumatic brain injury: thoracic and acceleration mechanisms. Neuroimage 54, S55–S61 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bowen, L.G., Fletcher, E.R., Richmond, D.R.: Estimate of man's tolerance to the direct effects of air blast. Defense Atomic Support Agency #2113, Defense Technology Information Center Report No. AD693105 (1968)

  19. Pätynen, J., Katz, B.F., Lokki, T.: Investigations on the balloon as an impulse source. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129(1), 27–33 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3518780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maher, R., Routh, T.: Wideband audio recordings of gunshots: waveforms and repeatability. Proceedings of the 141st Audio Engineering Society Convention, Los Angeles, CA, Convention Paper 9634 (2016)

  21. Alley, M.: Explosive blast loading experiments for TBI scenarios: characterization and mitigation. MSME Thesis, West Lafayette, IN, Purdue University, UMI Microform 1470126 distributed by Pro-Quest LLC, Ann Arbor (2009)

  22. Department of the Army: Explosives and Demolitions. Field Manual 5-250, Washington, D.C. (1992)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Courtney.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Needham.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kirschman, J., Pokutta-Paskaleva, A., Courtney, A. et al. Blast pressures and waveforms of consumer firecrackers. Shock Waves 31, 301–306 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-021-01013-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-021-01013-x

Keywords

Navigation