Abstract
The present study focuses on one mode of detonation initiation observed in a rapid compression machine (RCM). This mode is referred to as shock wave and flame front-induced detonation (SWFID). Experimental high-speed imaging and two-dimensional numerical simulations with skeletal chemistry are combined to unravel the dominant steps of detonation initiation under SWFID conditions. It is shown that the interaction between the shock wave generated by the end-gas auto-ignition and the spherical flame creates a region of high pressure and temperature which enables the acceleration of the flame front and the detonation onset. The experimental observation lacks adequate spatial and temporal resolution despite good reproducibility of the detonation onset. Based on the numerical results, phenomenological interpretation of the event within the framework of shock wave refraction indicates that the formation of a free-precursor shock wave at the transition between regular and irregular refraction may be responsible for detonation onset. The present results along with previous findings on shock wave reflection-induced detonation in the RCM indicate that super-knock occurs after the interaction of the shock wave generated by end-gas auto-ignition with the RCM walls, preignition flame, or another shock wave.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shafiee, S., Topal, E.: When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished? Energy Policy 37, 181–189 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.016
Smith, K., Frumkin, H., Balakrishnan, K., Butler, C., Chafe, Z., Fairlie, I., Kinney, P., Kjellstrom, T., Mauzerall, D., McKone, T., McMichael, A., Schneider, M.: Energy and human health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 34(1), 159–188 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031912-114404
Seinfeld, J., Pandis, S.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change. Wiley, Toronto (1998)
Wang, Z., Qi, Y., He, X., Wang, J., Shuai, S., Law, C.K.: Analysis of pre-ignition to super-knock: hotspot-induced deflagration to detonation. Fuel 144, 222–227 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.12.061
Qi, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, J., He, X.: Effects of thermodynamic conditions on the end gas combustion mode associated with engine knock. Combust. Flame 162, 4119–4128 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.08.016
Wang, Z., Liu, H., Reitz, R.: Knocking combustion in spark-ignition engines. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 61, 78–112 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.03.004
Grogan, K.P., Goldsborough, S.S., Ihme, M.: Ignition regimes in rapid compression machines. Combust. Flame 162, 3071–3080 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.03.020
Peters, N., Kerschgens, B., Paczko, G.: Super-knock prediction using a refined theory of turbulence. SAE Int. J. Engines 6(2), 953–967 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-1109
Im, H.G., Pal, P., Wooldridge, M.S., Mansfield, A.B.: A regime diagram for autoignition of homogeneous reactant mixtures with turbulent velocity and temperature fluctuations. Combust. Sci. Technol. 187, 1263–1275 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2015.1034355
Sankaran, R., Im, H.G., Hawkes, E.R., Chen, J.H.: The effects of non-uniform temperature distribution on the ignition of a lean homogeneous hydrogen–air mixture. Proc. Combust. Inst. 30, 875–882 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.176
Zeldovich, Y.B.: Regime classification of an exothermic reaction with nonuniform initial conditions. Combust. Flame 39, 211–214 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(80)90017-6
Bradley, D., Morley, C., Gu, X.J., Emerson, D.R.: Amplified pressure waves during autoignition: relevance to CAI engines. SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-2868 (2002). https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-2868
Gu, X.J., Emerson, D.R., Bradley, D.: Modes of reaction front propagation from hot spots. Combust. Flame 133, 63–74 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(02)00541-2
Dai, P., Chen, Z.: Supersonic reaction front propagation initiated by a hot spot in n-heptane/air mixture with multistage ignition. Combust. Flame 162, 4183–4193 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.08.002
Dai, P., Chen, Z., Chen, S., Ju, Y.: Numerical experiments on reaction front propagation in n-heptane/air mixture with temperature gradient. Proc. Combust. Inst. 35, 3045–3052 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.102
Wang, Z., Qi, Y., Liu, H., Zhang, P., He, X., Wang, J.: Shock wave reflection induced detonation (SWRID) under high pressure and temperature condition in closed cylinder. Shock Waves 26, 687–691 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-016-0677-5
Di, H., He, X., Zhang, P., Wang, Z., Wooldridge, M.S., Law, C.K., Wang, C., Shuai, S., Wang, J.: Effects of buffer gas composition on low temperature ignition of iso-octane and n-heptane. Combust. Flame 161, 2531–2538 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.04.014
Wang, Z., Li, F., Wang, Y.: A generalized kinetic model with variable octane number for engine knock prediction. Fuel 188, 489–499 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.067
Tanaka, S., Ayala, F., Keck, J.C.: A reduced chemical kinetic model for HCCI combustion of primary reference fuels in a rapid compression machine. Combust. Flame 133, 467–481 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(03)00057-9
Tsurushima, T.: A new skeletal PRF kinetic model for HCCI combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst. 32(2), 2835–2841 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2008.06.018
Fieweger, K., Blumenthal, R., Adomeit, G.: Self-ignition of S.I. engine model fuels: a shock tube investigation at high pressure. Combust. Flame 109, 599–619 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(97)00049-7
Richards, K.J., Senecal, P.K., Pomraning, E.: CONVERGE (v2.2). Convergent Science, Inc., Madison (2015)
Mansfield, A.B., Wooldridge, M.S.: High-pressure low-temperature ignition behavior of syngas mixtures. Combust. Flame 161(9), 2242–2251 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.03.001
Henderson, L.F.: The refraction of a plane shock wave at a gas interface. J. Fluid Mech. 26, 607–637 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112066001435
Abd-El-Fattah, A.M., Henderson, L.F., Lozzi, A.: Precursor shock waves at a slow–fast gas interface. J. Fluid Mech. 76, 157–176 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112076003182
Abd-El-Fattah, A.M., Henderson, L.F.: Shock waves at a slow–fast gas interface. J. Fluid Mech. 89, 79–95 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112078002475
Henderson, L.F.: On the refraction of shock waves. J. Fluid Mech. 198, 365–386 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112089000170
Haas, J.F., Sturtevant, B.: Interaction of weak shock waves with cylindrical and spherical gas inhomogeneities. J. Fluid Mech. 181, 41–76 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112087002003
Han, Z., Yin, X.: Shock Dynamics. Springer, Dordrecht (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2995-6
Austin, J.M., Pintgen, F., Shepherd, J.E.: Reaction zones in highly unstable detonations. Proc. Combust. Inst. 30, 1849–1857 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.157
Radulescu, M.I., Sharpe, G.J., Law, C.K., Lee, J.H.S.: The hydrodynamic structure of unstable cellular detonations. J. Fluid Mech. 580, 31–78 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112007005046
Ju, Y., Shimano, A., Inoue, O.: Vorticity generation and flame distortion induced by shock flame interaction. Proc. Combust. Inst. 27(1), 735–74 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(98)80467-0
Picone, J.M., Oran, E.S., Boris, J.P., Young, T.R.: Theory of vorticity generation by shock wave and flame interactions. In: Dynamics of Shock Waves, Explosions, and Detonations, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol. 94, AIAA (1985). https://doi.org/10.2514/5.9781600865695.0429.0448
Markstein, G.H.: A shock tube study of flame front-pressure wave interactions. Proc. Combust. Inst. 6, 387–398 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(57)80054-X
Thomas, G.O., Bambrey, R., Brown, C.: Experimental observations of flame acceleration and transition to detonation following shock–flame interaction. Combust. Theory Model. 5, 573–594 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1088/1364-7830/5/4/304
Dong, G., Fan, B., Ye, J.: Numerical investigation of ethylene flame bubble instability induced by shock waves. Shock Waves 17, 409–419 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-008-0124-3
Dong, G., Fan, B., Gui, M., Li, B.: Numerical simulations of interactions between a flame bubble with an incident shock wave and its focusing wave. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 223(10), 2357–2367 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1243/09544062JMES1467
Chen, X., Dong, G., Jiang, H.: A three-dimensional numerical study on instability of sinusoidal flame induced by multiple shock waves. Acta Mech. Sin. 33(2), 316–326 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-017-0639-x
Ivanov, M.F., Kiverin, A.D.: Generation of high pressures during the shock wave–flame interaction. High Temp. 53(5), 668–676 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0018151X15030086
Robert, A., Richard, S., Colin, O., Poinsot, T.: LES study of deflagration to detonation mechanisms in a downsized spark ignition engine. Combust. Flame 162(7), 2788–2807 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.04.010
Acknowledgements
This work was performed at Tsinghua University and was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91541206, 51706121), Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program (Grant No. 20161080114) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2017T100076). Remy Mével was supported by a start-up fund of the Center for Combustion Energy of Tsinghua University. The authors are grateful to J.E. Shepherd from Caltech for useful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by G. Ciccarelli.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Qi, Y., Xiang, S. et al. Shock wave and flame front induced detonation in a rapid compression machine. Shock Waves 28, 1109–1116 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-018-0832-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-018-0832-2