Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction of a high-speed combustion front with a closely packed bed of spheres

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Shock Waves Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The head-on collision of a combustion front with a closely packed bed of ceramic-oxide spheres was investigated in a vertical 76.2 mm diameter tube containing a nitrogen diluted stoichiometric ethylene–oxygen mixture. A layer of spherical beads in the diameter range of 3–12.7 mm was placed at the bottom of the tube and a flame was ignited at the top endplate. Four orifice plates spaced at one tube diameter were placed at the ignition end of the tube in order to accelerate the flame to either a “fast-flame” or a detonation wave before the bead layer face. The mixture reactivity was adjusted by varying the initial mixture pressure between 10 and 100 kPa absolute. The pressure before and within the bead layer was measured by flush wall-mounted pressure transducers. For initial pressures where a fast-flame interacts with the bead layer peak pressures recorded at the bead layer face were as high as five times the reflected Chapman–Jouget detonation pressure. The explosion resulting from the interaction developed by two distinct mechanisms; one due to the shock reflection off the bead layer face, and the other due to shock transmission and mixing of burned and unburned gas inside the bead layer. The measured explosion delay time (time after shock reflection from the bead layer face) was found to be independent of the incident shock velocity. As a result, the explosion initiation is not the direct result of the shock reflection process but instead is more likely due to the interaction of the reflected shock wave and the trailing flame. The bead layer was found to be very effective in attenuating the explosion front transmitted through the bead layer and thus isolating the tube endplate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartknecht W. (1981). Explosion: Course, Prevention, Protection. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. di Mare L., Mihalik T.A., Continillo G. and Lee J.H. (2000). Experimental and numerical study of flammability limits of gaseous mixtures in porous media. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 21(1–3): 117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Joo P., Duncan K. and Ciccarelli G. (2006). Flame quenching performance of ceramic foam. Combust. Sci. Technol. 178(10–11): 1755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Spalding D.B. (1957). A theory of flammability limits and flame quenching. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 240(1220): 83–100

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Babkin V.S., Korzhavin A.A. and Bunev V.A. (1991). Propagation of premixed gaseous explosion flames in porous media. Combust. Flame 87: 182–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pinaev A.V. (1994). Combustion modes and flame propagation criteria for an encumbered space. Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 30(4): 454–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Makris A., Shafique H., Lee J.H. and Knystautas R. (1995). Influence of mixture sensitivity and pore size on detonation velocities in porous media. Shock Waves 5: 89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Slungaard T., Engebretson T. and Sonju O.K. (2003). The influence of detonation cell size and regularity on the propagation of gaseous detonations in granular materials. Shock Waves 12: 301–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gvozdeeva L.G., Faresov I.M., Brossard J. and Charpentier N. (1986). Normal shock wave reflection on porous compressible materials. AIAA Prog. Astronaut. Aeronaut. 106: 155–165

    Google Scholar 

  10. Skews B.W. (1991). The reflected pressure field in the interaction of weak shock waves with compressible foam. Shock Waves 1: 205–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mazor G., Ben-Dor G., Igra O. and Sorek S. (1994). Shock wave interaction with cellular materials. Shock Waves 3: 159–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Levy A., Ben-Dor G., Skews B.W. and Sorek S. (1993). Head-on collision of normal shock waves with rigid porous materials. Exp. Fluids 15: 183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Strelow R.A. and Cohen A. (1959). Limitations of the reflected shock technique for studying fast chemical reactions and its application to the observation of relaxation in nitrogen and oxygen. J. Chem. Phys. 10(1): 257–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peraldi O., Knystautas R. and Lee J.H. (1986). Criteria for transition to detonation in tubes. Proc. Combust. Inst. 21: 1629–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shepherd J.: Detonation data base. http://www.galcit.caltech.edu/detn_db/html/

  16. Ciccarelli G., Fowler C. and Bardon M. (2005). Effects of obstacle size and spacing on the initial stage of flame acceleration in a rough tube. Shock Waves 14(3): 161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Scarinci T., Lee J.H., Thomas G.O., Bambrey R.J. and Edwards D.H. (1993). Amplification of a pressure wave due to its passage through a flame. AIAA Prog. Astronauti. 152: 3–24

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shepherd, J.E.: http://www.galcit.caltech.edu/EDL/public/sdt/SD_Toolbox/

  19. Konnov, A.A.: Detailed reaction mechanism for small hydrocarbons combustion. Release 0.4, http://homepages.vub.ac.be/konnov/ (1998)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaby Ciccarelli.

Additional information

Communicated by L. Bauwens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hlouschko, S., Ciccarelli, G. Interaction of a high-speed combustion front with a closely packed bed of spheres. Shock Waves 18, 317–327 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-008-0132-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-008-0132-3

PACS

Navigation