Letter to the Editor

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Harvey MA, Versi E. Predictive value of clinical evaluation of stress urinary incontinence: a summary of the published literature. Int Urogynecol J 2001;12:31–37
Article CAS Google Scholar
Vereecken R. A critical view on the value of urodynamics in nonneurogenic incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J 2000;11:188–195
Article CAS Google Scholar
O’Donnell P. Pitfalls of urodynamic testing. Urol Clin North AM 1991;18:257–268
PubMed Google Scholar
Rosier P, Van Kerrebroeck P. Inter and intra-observer variability of the diagnosis ‘detrusor overactivity’ on the registration of the urodynamic investigation. Neurourol Urodyn 1995;14:434–435
Article Google Scholar
Fischer-Rasmussen W, Hansen R, Stage P. Predictive values of diagnostic tests in the evaluation of female urinary stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986;65:292–294
Article Google Scholar

Authors

G. Flesh
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
M. A. Harvey
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
E. Versi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Flesh, G., Harvey, M. & Versi, E. Letter to the Editor. Int Urogynecol J 13, 57–58 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001920200014

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.