Skip to main content

Patient Satisfaction and Complications Following Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Urinary Retention, Urge Incontinence and Perineal Pain: a Multicenter Evaluation

Abstract:

The aim of the study was to determine the success rate, the complications, the failures and the solutions found in troublesome cases. A retrospective study was performed in three university centers in Belgium. Between March 1994 and April 1998, a quadripolar electrode and a pulse generator were implanted in 53 patients (8 men, 45 women, 43 ± 12 years, mean follow-up 24 ± 8 months, range 13–39 months). During the first few months, 45 (85%) of the 53 patients had an objective response. Eight late failures occurred, with a mean failure delay of 9 ± 5 months. We performed 15 revisions in 12 patients. Major complications were pain and current-related troubles. The outcome was significantly better (P= 0.001) in post-stress incontinence surgery patients. Device-related pain was found more frequently in patients with dysuria and/or retention or perineal pain, and the test stimulation was less reliable (P= 0.025) in patients with a psychiatric history. Sacral nerve stimulation is efficient in treating patients with refractory lower urinary tract symptoms and/or perineal pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Everaert, K., De Ridder, D., Baert, L. et al. Patient Satisfaction and Complications Following Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Urinary Retention, Urge Incontinence and Perineal Pain: a Multicenter Evaluation . Int Urogynecol J 11, 231–236 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001920070031

Download citation

  • Key words:Incontinence – Neuromodulation – Neurostimulation – Pain – Retention – Voiding dysfunction