Skip to main content
Log in

Response to letter to “Patient Impression of Improvement 1 year After Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage 2 or Higher”

  • Author Response (Invitation)
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, L.M. Stoter, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Stoter LM, Notten KJB, Claas M, et al. Patient impression of improvement 1 year after sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse stage 2 or higher. Int Urogynecol J. 2024;35(5):985–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05750-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. British Society of Urogynaecology and Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse (Green-top guideline no. 46). London: RCOG; 2015.

  3. Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HWF. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h3717.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Doaee M, Moradi-Lakeh M, Nourmohammadi A, Razavi-Ratki SK, Nojomi M. Management of pelvic organ prolapse and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(2):153–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Enklaar RA, van IJsselmuiden MN, IntHout J, et al. Practice pattern variation: treatment of pelvic organ prolapse in The Netherlands. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(7):1973–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa M. Stoter.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Kaven Baessler

Editor in Chief: Kaven Baessler

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stoter, L.M., Notten, K.J.B. & Kluivers, K.B. Response to letter to “Patient Impression of Improvement 1 year After Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage 2 or Higher”. Int Urogynecol J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05862-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05862-9

Navigation